martyna, what was the feedback? i will quote, the feedback was from the head of the regional military administration of kharkiv region, and it sounded as follows: i don't care if the company was registered even 5 minutes ago, if she can put the grass, i think we can conclude from such a statement that in this way... in fact, we are now trying to legalize the future of any or any such similar devices, that it does not matter who the owner , it doesn't matter when the company is registered, it can be registered, listen, even if it was a few days ago, even as mr. singubiv literally said, even if it was 5 minutes ago, and this, in a normal environment and in the anti-corruption community, it is generally considered to be a sign. a sign of efficiency of such a firm, it does not constitute at all, does not constitute any barrier for the authorities, this is the first, and the second, we asked in general, and all the communication is preliminary, as well as the journalists who read our article, who were at the briefing, wh

martyna, congratulations. yes, no...

that is , certain data collected by martyna bohuslavat and her colleagues were made public. in particularthey were dedicated to kharkiv, well , it concerned the involvement of certain individuals, individuals, entrepreneurs for the implementation of strategically important areas and objects, well , there were quite a lot of strange and different such combinations, well, feedback came from the kharkiv regional military administration , they explained there and... further what is happening in the kharkiv region from that review, first of all, when we talk, for example, about the transparency of certain procedures, how the kharkiv authorities behave, well, you know, and... i am not actually an expert in to the public administration of kharkiv, i can simply say that such a general issue for procurement during wartime is the need to actually ensure a balance between speed and competitiveness of the actual selection, and the actual result we have to check according to two criteria, whether what is needed was built was built and how much it cost, compared to the analogous cost, in particular the

about the situation in the kharkiv region, and in particular regarding the fortification. talk with martynathe mezh anti-corruption center. mrs. martino, welcome you good day. well, you wrote a column, quite a serious column, in which you exposed certain facts that testify to possible fictitiousness, which relate to contracts for the construction of fortifications in the kharkiv region. yes, and when this is a very sensitive topic, now, especially in ukrainian society, because now. there are ongoing battles actually in the northern border regions of kharkiv region, this information causes people a lot of anger, as well as a lack of understanding of why this is happening right now, when we really need almost every penny for the in order to defend against the enemy, how did you actually manage to find out the fact that during the construction of fortifications in the kharkiv region , certain restrictions were made, so really the least. what we would like to do in the third year of the war is to investigate possible corruption facts, signs of corruption offenses during the construction of fort

ukrainian media and political community, well, the information was extremely impressed , given by martyna bohuslavets, yes, when we talk about certain strange, strange participants and winners of various procedures in the kharkiv region, well, i wanted... that the tsc would withdraw or, on the contrary, point to the culprits or withdraw the charges? first of all, i would like to note that yesterday we succeeded a lot, it is probably the first time in the last three years or so, or i don't even remember when we still forced the chairman of the verkhovna rada and the monomajority to listen to the opposition and finally respond to our. return, including regarding the change of the agenda, please understand that all agendas are approved at the conciliation council, of course they are approved by a monomajority, since they have the greatest right to vote, and their vote is decisive, therefore, of course, our co-chairs of the faction can never achieve what ukraine needs, not us, because of some european political ambitions there... and solidarity, the laws of the whole country nevertheless , th

extremely high-profile publication arrived, to which we cannot but... react, yes, in particular, martynaohuslavets, the head of the mezh anti-corruption center, published a certain study when it comes to not fully thought out, as it seems, to everyone who can. .. get acquainted with the relevant text, not fully thought out contracts for the supply of wood for fortifications with companies with signs of fictitiousness, well, accordingly, that is, classically under direct contracts, without competitive procurement, we are talking about the kharkiv regional military administration, there is already information, so the head of the kharkiv ova sinigobov will hold relevant briefings and explain, well, but, but, but, that is, there were quite a few... well, i would say with elements of scandal, details, for example, information is given about one of the fops. three months after registration, the department makes a direct agreement with him contracts for the supply of wood worth millions of hryvnias. this fop was registered in july 23. well, he had executive enforcement for a fine. he was previo

fortifications, i don't know if this will be considered by your committee, but here, for example , martyna bohuslavets, she is the head of the mezh anti-corruption center, the executive director of the institute of legislative ideas, this is a public organization. she studied a number of documents of agreements, and she writes in the pages of ukrainian pravda, the column came out that hundreds of millions of hryvnias could probably be stolen on the construction of fortifications, and as a result the critical situation in the kharkiv region, where russia is actively advancing, it states that 270 million uah for wood were transferred to a number of fops, and all of them began to earn millions immediately a few months after registration, classically under direct contracts and without ... from competitive procurement, just to remove all unnecessary questions in society, whether or not the money on the fortifications was stolen or not, because now this topic is very relevant, well, depending on how the russian army will advance, whether will you raise this issue to the committees? look, well, a

works and the corresponding tenders for their execution, yes, well, yesterday appeared publication by martynaohuslavets, with whom we talked in particular on this topic, well... and there the information is so-so, you know, it raises a lot of questions, well , we hope that he called the law enforcement officers, what is going on with that in sumy oblast now, is everything quiet and smooth? i will be grateful to colleagues who will still be able to get these official data, get information about the use of sumy ova funds, because at the moment we do not have the opportunity to fully analyze the situation that is happening, i repeat, due to the secrecy of the information, but this information should be... open , that is, this probably, this is a violation of the legislation in force in ukraine, well, let's hope that they are not hiding because there is something to hide, i mean in a negative context that the situation is not similar to the one in kharkiv region, thank you, alyona yatsyna, journalist and sumy was in touch with us, i just want to add here the spokesman of the siversk operational-t

yes, because a few days ago , a rather high-profile publication appeared, authored by martyna bohuslavetsre and there , data was provided about these or other rather strange persons responsible for procurement and works, well, there is some uncle who is there... in once, i don't know, a bottle of whiskey in some supermarket and so on, for that i received 100 hours of community service and so on, well , there was quite colorful information there, what are these people, perhaps, or is everything okay with that, well, look, well , i don’t know these people who won all this there, well, i think that first of all, well, this commission, which was created, should deal with the principle, well... completely, who allowed and who agreed to this construction scheme, they didn't decide to build there themselves, that's what he gave permission, some commission went, i don’t know there from the regional leadership, it’s the same, it’s anyway, somehow it had to be controlled, there had to be some authority of the person who was supposed to control it all, but it turns out that... now, as you say, all t

reasons are for this dissatisfaction of kharkiv residents, so a couple of days ago, a publication by martynapeared dedicated to a rather critical analysis. those characters who won part of the tenders, the person who drank half a liter of whiskey from some deli in kharkiv, and so on, are not here it's about everyone, well, but there were such characters, and accordingly, the situation with the fortifications, what about them, well, when we talk about what is not secret information without coordinates and so on, just so that there is an understanding, whether it was done or not , i won't make it. is it somewhere, but is it done somewhere? well, this is your last phrase, it will be true: incomplete, unfinished, started, not finished, that is, in this regard, yes, there was still a problem with the allocation of funds, which the verkhovna rada approved and allocated for fortification belatedly, after all, last autumn year, and you must understand that i will give you such an example, the purchase, for example, of roundwood from our forest farms, that is, at the beginning, when this money was al

the edition of ukranian pravda , the head of the anti-corruption, anti-corruption center of mezh, martynauslavets, published a blog, she analyzed the public expenses of the kharkiv ova for building fortification and found that a significant part of the funds, in particular for supplies. they received companies that have a rather dubious origin and signs of efficiency, i asked this very question to your colleague on the committee, roman kostenko, the day before, he said, well, maybe this is a standard situation during the war, a company that never did anything like that there, but during the war , she repurposed herself and suddenly started trading in wood, he assumed that this could be the case, and i understand that it seems suspicious to you, it seems suspicious to me, i i understand why roman says that... because he is a representative of the military sphere, and i, as a person who would work in the odesa regional state administration, would know well how closely the heads of the administration work together with the head of the afrodors, so not knowing about which names won, how much

martyna bohuslavets, head of the anti-corruption center: mezha, author publication, which literally blew up the network, is dedicated to fortifications in the kharkiv region. we pass the floor to our numbers. yes, anna eva melnyk is ready to share information with us, so we pass the word, and we ask you to tell us briefly what this issue will be about. thank you, colleagues, i approved. financial aid to ukraine, how much money was allocated and when our state will receive it, more on that later, stay with us. and first about the situation in kharkiv oblast, the armed forces withdrew from their position in the district. lukyantsiv in the north of kharkiv region, the general staff reported. just now, units of our troops are repelling enemy attacks from the russian side of shebekeni in the direction of vovchansk. at the same time, the cleaning of urban buildings on the northern outskirts of the city continues. the russians killed two people in the vavchan community in kharkiv oblast. an 83-year-old man and a woman were fatally wounded in the village of gatishche. in vovchansk, the head of t