l aterin marv fertel, jim boyd, and joe rubin. i'm greg, thankou forng us tay.>> coming up, iowa's first sh dsshe political blowback from the ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in the state, and discussion about preventible chronic diseases from the riance health soio is meeting in williamsburg, virginia, and c-span2as live coverage. >>artewacgn a iaennd saw t mirt fur is time, and by 1979, she was in full-fledged opposition to carter and what she saw as carterrism, that a arcu calshe w fal of the shah and the fall of nicaragua. theaan --litical woman behind >> book tv this weekend on c-span2. >> hit hoyte lerr en whe willized this armies were not coming to -- he collapsed when he felt -- he realized it had come to an end and it was a questio of suicide. >> histori with a new lk e sond wldarromdo tl'se power to his dark chaotic final days. >> the main objective not to be captured alive of the russians. he was afraid of being taken through moscow in a cagend be at a evbrnetermined to die with him. >> marsha ternus spent 15 yea as a justice on the iowa suprem

[applause] marv fertel, what's with yo why should the united states build new nuclear lants? the firsteaso eg to kesrw nua li eri sy pl pce.l the other reon is we have a society move to a cleaner, less mission, particularly lowe environment, nuclear is right now the only srce elic24ndduno greenhouse gases or other air pollutants. so if you want reliable electricy, we want to make a move to a cleaner environment when we produce it, if not the only thingbut veryor paf >> new nuclear is intertwined with extending the life of existing nuclear power plants and we'll get into that. but what are issues that should be ca you do when the licensing timeframe for the country's cxisting nuclear power plant reelfef e ic tac tht plans for a license for 40 years in the expected lifetime of all the component of the plan and to extend that mass is happening for another 20 years onehd edeplyntediio patbity to rviv another 20 years to not endanger anyone. with nuclear is very high rewards, incredibly high risk so g ated wh anhinggig wehalo experience with the degradation of material, the almost

[applause] marv fertel, what's with you?hy ould the united states tireaegpln make sure we have an adequate reliable electricity supply because that's what nuclear plants produce. the other reason is we have a society move to a ceaner, less mission, paticularly lower envient,ucle igh wte o electricity that produces electricity 24/7 and produces no greenhouse gases or other air pollutants. so if you want reliable electricity, we want to ake a move to a cleaner environment onhibuvempnttinote o it. >> new nuear is intertwined with extending the life of existing nuclear power plants and we'll get into that. but what are issues that should be can you do when e iesi exngleowla cck >> are merely safety of the public and the fact that plans for a license for 40 years in the expected lifetime of all the component of the plan and to extend thamasss ppeng fo ntheso a bested deeply into the condition of the plant, its ability to survive another 20 years to not endanger anyone. wi nuclear is ryhigh rd cb hri soedh hi going wrong. so if yo