harper's lengthy and ponderous critique. boom, boom, followed dwight mcdonald all condescension and commentary. boom, boom, boom, went mary kempten, bringing the 18 pounders to bear in what was intended as the cue degrau. -- the coup de grace. they all came to the same conclusion. conservative journal was needed, but "national review" was not it. bill summed it up in his reply in the august 1, 1956 issue of nr, all three of the jurnls harpers commentary, the progressive, seemed to represent the mere existence of "national review", not understanding as they're intolerant of descent there is nothing they would welcome more than not genuine descent but because it pains them to be bored by it and when they are not be bored by it, they are being afraunted by its vulgaritario appalled by its insouckyance and displayed by its ignorance. nothing absolutely nothing is more absolutely needed than a real conservative magazine but alas ours is no such thing and they must accordingly scan the heavens for it. but "national review" still refused to go away or to be intimidated. in young david sling there was a weapon the liberal establi