position you're referring to is a textbook example of that using chemical weapons as weapons of mass destruction all those claims are very weak on evidence really but the point is that really when you use the weapons of mass deception no one cares about what is the evidence. you know alice talking to us live from moscow. now washington and london sports for military intervention has taken its toll on the financial world the threats have spurred oil and gold prices while investors have rushed to pull their money from stock markets artie's katie pilgrim looks at how the rhetoric has affected the world economy bombs they aren't falling yet on syria global financial damage is already being done gold is what people usually turn to in these uncertain times and that russia is very much being felt in earnest here we got the brilliant up forty dollars an ounce just over the last two days alone oil prices are surging to their highest level since twenty eleven that is over concerns that are american and british an attack on syria will bring about a serious consequences and threaten global surprise now the

if we threaten the country, if it uses one weapon of mass destruction and it goes ahead and ignores us, what worth does our threat hold against that other country deciding whether to build theirs. is there any way we can convince iran not to go nuclear if we let syria so flagrantly go chemical. and anne gearan, correspondent for "the washington post," and jeremy bash. i want you first to start, secretary of state john kerry did an amazing performance today in certainly one of his most forceful and most passionate speeches i've ever seen him give, laid out the reasons this average afternoon for action against syria, including the first hard numbers on the death toll, numbers much higher than we had heard before. let's listen. >> we know that the regime has used those weapons multiple times this year. we know that for three days before the attacks, the syrian regime's chemical weapons personnel were on the ground, in the area, making preparations. we know that the syrian regime elements were told to prepare for the attack by putting on gas masks and taking precautions. we know rockets ca

we told there were weapons of mass destruction in iraq and there weren't. it is a complete humiliation for the obama administration. here's obama trying to gather an ally or two for a pinprick and gets nothing. >> the president laid down america's credibility by issuing a red line. >> the president of the united states said for a year that bashar assad thoos go. now we're in a position to go, now they have no strategy, no idea what they're doing.

a weapon of mass destruction in the hands of a terrorist. >> reporter: mueller warned about another danger, americans joining islam mick radicals. do you believe some americans have made their way to syria? yes. >> reporter: he says fror groups and individuals have -- terror groups and individuals have my great to many areas in the middle east. >> it changed from september 11th where it was al qaeda, afghanistan, pakistan. it has gone to yemen, the arabian peninsula. >> reporter: mueller said law enforcement must do a better job identifying people before they act. >> i do believe we're better at responding, but when it goes to preventing at the outset, it's a difficult position on how you prevent that person, particularly when they have a past history of mental disease. >> reporter: last month mueller leaves the fbi after 12 years in

this is a crime committed with a weapon of mass destruction. according to kerry the u.s.fficials called the members of the leadership of the syrian opposition to say that the u.s. does still plan to hold the perpetrators of chemical weapons affair accountable. but we've also heard from members of the syrian opposition that they are incredibly disappointed, they tell cnn, they believed that they were on the verge of seeing strikes against bashar assad regime for this latest use of chemical weapons and just about several months ago in the last such use, which was unmet by any punitive measures, i was told that they were very, very afraid, the syrian opposition was very afraid that if it wasn't met, then a terrible new catastrophe with chemical weapons would happen. of course, that has happened. we also heard tweets from here in britain whereby the foreign secretary william hague even though their prime minister was defeated in his attempt to join this military action, he said obama, the president, made a very, very strong speech today. we've also heard that the president of

both in terms of us making sure that -- weapons of mass destruction are not proliferating as well as needing to protect our allies, our bases, in the region. this is something that is going to require america's attention and hopefully the entire international community's attention. >> senator mccain came on "new day" very strong on this. he believes the u.s. credibility in the region has been hurt. that a situation like syria, that he believes there has been delay. and it has led to a boldness by the regime there. that in egypt what many believe was a coup wasn't called a coup that led to the problems we are seeing there now. do do you think that's fair criticism? >> i am sympathetic to senator mccain's passion for helping people work through what is an extraordinarily difficult and heartbreaking situation.

apparently there were not weapons of mass destruction, but the problem was that to take the point, the judgment, without giving new evidence. the point is that you need to make a judgment, the prime minister said. >> when will we get those facts? another issue. stay with us. ♪ >> throughout the week we keep you up-to-date with sports news, the action, the results. join us for the sports around up, right here. >> the king of jordan has made a short trip. >> keep connected on social media, taking the first step, and tweak your week. break away from your television. find another dimension. become even more linked to the news. get a connected view of the world. >> 10 years have passed, but like i -- like in the tiny southeast asian state, $1 per day. the country is pinning its hopes on oil reserves, but they have yet to become a reality. revisited, an exclusive report. >> because a new page of history gets written every day. because breaking news, way. information everywhere. a different take on the news. ♪ >> before we resume, we're watching closely for you at the top of the hour, u.n. in

we know that weapons of mass destruction have been used and in this case chemical weapons. we know that we're pretty sure that you can tie it directly to the assad regime. we know our president has take an very declarative position, and i think a proper one to say this is unacceptable and we're considering the range of options we have to respond to that. so on the one hand, if you do decide to take military action in response, you have to consider the range of consequences of that action. some people will talk about mission creep. some people will talk about a retaliation on the part of perhaps the assad regime against israel. we have -- >> let me ask you general, let me ask you general, if president assad as many believe unleashed chemical weapons against the syrian people and the rebels over throwing him. if america enter seeds now in any way, it will be seen clearly as aiding the rebels against assad, therefore taking a position in a civil war and many people in america say look, we've been down this road before in iraq, afghanistan, libya, almost everywhere. is it ameri

senseless conflict in the middle east this time against syria again it's all about weapons of mass destruction an echo of the catastrophe called iraq western military intervention in syria only make things worse. to cross talk the war in syria i'm joined by he has an a bell in damascus he's a syrian academic with the syrian foreign press in washington we have michael shank he is the director of foreign policy at the friends comedian national legislation and a professor at george mason university and in new york we cross to ed he is a associate editor at reason twenty four seventh's having cross talk rules and i think that means you can jump in anytime you want michael in watching if i go to you first secretary kerry is absolutely convinced the assad regime has used chemical weapons against his people he doesn't give any proof but he's absolutely convinced and now we have the drumbeat to war i think i saw this movie and it has a very bad ending you know what i mean yes certainly we did the same in iraq we undermined u.n. inspectors there we're doing the same in syria we actually called on the i

done it we can't just just be pointing fingers we have this before when there was the weapon of mass destruction destruction debate and the presentation in the united nations by colin powell and we knew that didn't come to be true so we have to be very very skeptical of any form of this sort of intelligence that comes out unless the that is substantial proof on it all right and p. ca laid him on this thank you very much indeed for talking to us thank you. michael . and he is on facebook where you can join the discussion about america's plans to attack syria well do you want to follow say about two u.s. warships in the mediterranean and obama's hanes at an imminent find out and tell us or choose saying on facebook dot com slash our senior. u.s. taxpayers shelled out more than one hundred million dollars for lethal aid to the syrian rebels the opposition includes al qaeda linked groups too so america's intervention in syria might mean the helping someone they consider their sworn enemy and it's the situation now explain. a major aspect that's close to impossible to prevent in the syrian crisis sho

done it we can't just just be pointing fingers we have this before when there was the weapon of mass destruction destruction debate and the presentation in the united nations by colin powell and we knew that didn't come to be true so we have to be very very skeptical of any form of this sort of intelligence that comes out unless it is the that is substance of proof on military action is not going to be a resolution in syria it hasn't been anywhere else so let's let's change history let's change what's been going on before because we're talking about bloodshed now if this is allowed to take its course there'd be far greater bloodshed. just remind you r.t. is on facebook and here are your responses to obama's plans to attack syria some of you are calling for impeachment of the u.s. president and many others aren't convinced that obama is acting in the best interests of either the american or the syrian people well you can join the debate right now the address is facebook dot com forward slash our team needs. what we've already seen countries neighboring syria say that they want no part in the mili

all extraordinarily harshly if we turned a blind eye to a dictator's wanton use of weapons of mass destruction against all warnings, against all common understanding of decency. these things we do know. we also know that we have a president who does what he says that he will do. and he has said very clearly that whatever decision he makes in syria, it will bear no resemblance to afghanistan, iraq or even libya. it will not involve any boots on the ground. it will not be open-ended and it will not assume responsibility for a civil war that is already well under way. the president has been clear, any action that he might decide to take will be limited and tailored response to ensure that a brutal and flagrant use of chemical weapons is held accountable and ultimately, ultimately, we are committed, we remain committed, we believe it's the primary objective is to have a diplomatic process that can resolve this through negotiation. because we know there is no ultimate military solution. it has to be political. it has to happen at the negotiating table and we are deeply committed to getting there. s

senseless conflict in the middle east this time against syria again it's all about weapons of mass destruction and the echo of the catastrophe called iraq western military intervention in syria only make things worse. it was terrible they won't very hard to take out. once again to put them on here as a plane flight pattern that has sacks would that hurt their militants. one. of the most of those it was. only. going to. play. the full. kaminski told language it's up to the to close these programs and documentaries in arabic it's all here on the t.v. reporting from the world's hot spots the v.o.i.p. interviews intriguing story for you. then try a small t arabic to find out more visit our big dog all teeth dog called. play. play. play. play. play. play. play. play play. play. play. play play. i play. people. pleasure to have you with us here today i'm sure. so mistletoes mission to save lives. and he begin a new mission which was basically to top the government of cuba with these overflights through and we slips out and dropping medals and different kind of you know propaganda out his window now

the united nations in a bid to convince the world that iraq possessed stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. the white house rejects that comparison. >> i do not agree these are similar situations. i think there are some very important differences. what we saw in that circumstance was an administration that was searching high and low to produce evidence to justify a military invasion. >> the white house says that unlike during the lead up to the iraq war, the evidence this time is plain to see in the internet video and testimony from doctors at this the, from patients treated. they are promising a public intelligence assessment report -- before taking action. congress was briefed with classified intelligence on a conference call with senior officials thursday evening. some senior members of congress are calling for a vote form of this reaction is taken. >> i do think we would be so much better off if the administration would come to congress, colloquy buddy back, and let -- call everybody back, and let congress authorize this activity. >> the obama ministration maintains any strike would be

if we threaten the country, if it uses one weapon of mass destruction and it goes ahead and ignores us, what worth does our threat hold against that other country deciding whether to build theirs. is there any way we can convince iran not to go nuclear if we let syria so flagrantly go chemical. and wrnt correspondent for "the washington post." i want you first to start, secretary of state john kerry did an amazing performance today in certainly one of his most forceful and most passionate speeches i've ever seen him give, laid out the reasons this average afternoon for action against syria, including the first hard numbers on the death toll, numbers much higher than we had heard before. let's listen. >> we know that the regime has used those weapons multiple times this year. we know that for three days before the attacks, the syrian regime's chemical weapons personnel were on the ground, in the area, making preparations. we know that the syrian regime elements were told to prepare for the attack by putting on gas masks and taking precautions. we know rockets came only from regime-contr

we have seen this movie before, the presentation of evidence of weapons of mass destruction. we know how iraq ended up. are you firmly committed to this intelligence? do you buy it? >> i do. i think the intelligence here is pretty clear. i recognize that the american people are exhausted by war. we all are. but at the same time, we continue to have a responsibility to exercise leadership in the world. it would be nice if the u.n. acted. it would be nice if our allies acted. it would be nice if others were willing to take that action. but when that line has been drawn and action needs to be taken, then the united states ultimately has to do that for the sake of the world and for the sake of world peace. >> what's the best outcome of a u.s. military strike, in your view? >> if we do a limited and targeted attack that goes after his capabilities and that deters him from any further use that it hopefully can set the groundwork to be able to pursue a diplomatic strategy that ultimately can result in a negotiated settlement there. >> so what's the worst possible outcome of an attac

if we threaten the country, if it uses one weapon of mass destruction and goes ahead and ignores us, what worth does our threat hold against that other country deciding whether to build theirs? is there any way we can convince iran not to go nuclear if we let syria so flagrantly go chemical? ann garrett, diplomatic correspondent for the "washington post." jeremy, former chief of staff for the cia and defense department under the great leon panetta. i want you first to start, secretary of state john kerry in an amazing performance today, most forceful and passionate speeches i've seen him give laid out the reasons this afternoon for action against syria including the first numbers on the death toll, numbers much higher than we'd heard before. let's listen. >> we know that the regime has used those weapons multiple times this year. we know that for three days before the attack, the syrian regime's chemical weapons personnel were on the ground, in the area, making preparations. we know that the syrian regime elements were told to prepare for the attack by putting on gas masks and taking

senseless conflict in the middle east this time against syria again it's all about weapons of mass destruction and the echo of the catastrophe called iraq will western military intervention in syria only make things worse. i. one of. these. people. pleasure to have you with us here today i'm sure. so mistletoes mission to save lives. and he begin a new mission which was basically to taunt the government of cuba with these overflights throwing we slips out and dropping medals and different kind of you know propaganda out his window now we. are going to war. that bustle toll claimed he successfully tested his new weapon in the everglades. his plan was to fire at somewhere in cuba. i went to cuba in january of ninety six in the course of a long dinner. president castro raised the issue of the overflights with me. basically saying. you've got to tell your government to. get control of these people that are making these very veiled threats and overflights and please fix the problem. and we took legal. being charged with features compound our award to stop those flight a proceeding possibly get a mo

@@ax >>> an american president says a middle eastern country has weapons of mass destruction.a coalition of the willing from military strike against that said country. sound familiar? some say it sounds like a decade ago when he heard george w. bush make his case for war in iraq. the similarities are just a few. take a listen. >> the iraqi regime is a serious and growing threat to peace. on the commands of a dictator, the regime is armed with bilogical and chemical weapons. it possesses ballistic missiles and promotes international terror and seeks nuclear weapons. >> my next guest says there are far more differences between president bush's action in iraq ten years ago and president obama's desire to act in syria. jane newton small is time magazine's correspondent. good to see you as always. we should let our audience know setting up those similarities, that's the first line from your article. tell us why you think they're not similar. >> well, first of all, the object of the action and that regime change. about ten years ago george w. bush really wanted to topple hussein. ba

he says in syria it's clear dreadful weapons of mass destruction exist and have been used. nobody disputes that. the argument might be who used them. very, very different to iraq where the british public was misled about weapons of mass destruction, which were never found. they've already been used in syria. >> they've been used, but we don't know who used them. one is inclined to think is must be assad, but the beneficiaries would be his opponents. >> reporter: who do you think used them? >> i do not know. i haven't seen the evidence. you have to bear in mind his opponent will benefit because that's the one thing to draw obama into the conflict. >> reporter: if there was conclusive evidence they were used by assad side, would you be in favor of military intervention then? >> i'm not in favor of a unilateral u.s. intervention with britain arriving shotgun. any military intervention in syria must be led by the united nations, and other countries in the region must play a big role. >> reporter: the americans must feel rather annoyed with the british at least in private now. >

the bush administration was not only after all was said and done, no wepons of mass destruction werefound but they didn't give the u.n. inspectors time to finish their inspections. is there a concern if the united states moves right now to move toward a military strike might be doing the same thing by not allowing the u.n. inspectors time to finish what they started just this morning? >> reporter: that's an interesting question and would have to be a rapid decision in making a strike move forward. the feeling here is there will have to be a couple of days in addition to what we saw today to determine what they do find on the ground there. it shouldn't take too long going into hospitals and taking blood samples from the bodies of people who died or people who survived these attacks and determine if serein gas was used. the thinking here is the united stated wait for that to happen, this coalition to wait for that to happen and the results to be revealed and if they move quickly that's not necessarily too fast. i think people want to see, in had this area any way, decisive strike. they

we have currently rules in place dealing with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. we have international norms that have been violated by certain countries, and united nations has put sanctions in place, but if there is a sense that over time nobody is willing actually to enforce them, then people do not take them seriously. i am very clear that the world generally is more wary. certainly, the united states has gone through over a decade of war. part of our obligation no as a leader of the world is to make sure that when you have a regime that is willing to use not -- willing to use weapons are prohibited by international norms, there are people, including children, that are held to account. thank you. calls, moment, your tweets, and e-mails live on "washington journal." 50thhen the red ribbon anniversary of the march on washington. >> very often what you see as the causes of the first lady become so entwined with her causethat she keeps that and that image through the rest of her life and we can talk about roselyn and her commitment to mental health. and we can tal

the evidence is unquestionable just like it was when saddam was accused of hiding weapons of mass destruction his art is damage again on america's record of missteps military. before every u.s. intervention in the last fifteen years there was a hype of lies misinformation and discrepancies but every time washington would present its case for war as the ultimate truth leading people to believe that waging war was the only way to peace as the us is preparing an attack on syria striking similarities can be found in how lawson can makes its case for intervention material i will present you comes from a variety of sources some are u.s. sources and some of those of other countries we have additional information about this attack and that information is being compiled and reviewed together with our partners and we will provide that information in the days ahead some of the sources are technical such as intercepted telephone conversations and photos taken by satellites what have we learned about the actual proof the white house claims it has on syria's use of chemical weapons it will for u.s. officia

epb embedded in the language -- >> the punishment of somebody proliferating weapons of mass destruction. >> right, remember, he had a major summit on controlling not only nuclear materials but weapons of mass destruction -- >> chemical weapons are considered weapons of mass destruction. >> the whole world, most of the world, came to that. you even had rohani from iran saying it looks like chemical weapons to me. >> it's been noted, the u.s. government has noted, the iranian, the new iranian president seems to be more -- more in belief that -- >> yes, thus far, behind the scenes, iran has not joined up on our side and they won't, but they've been in a back channel basis at least more accepting of the situation than the russians. the russians are really, really dug in. for some reason. i don't understand. it would be interesting for them to begin considering if an islamist extremist group ended up with chemical weapons in chechnya, how they would behave. for some reason, over syria, vladimir putin has decided to square off -- >> if you look at kosovo, we saw the "new york times" said the

the western intelligence at that stage supposedly conclaves proved that iraq had weapons of mass destruction under saddam hussein as we know that later was proven to be false and that expression came about referring to false and incorrect intelligence information i mean we're hearing from the british prime minister david cameron as much as much as this already he's saying that all that there is not one hundred percent conclaves of intelligence that assad did use chemical weapons so this expression really does who food to be the supposed a conclusive proof proof that assad has chemical weapons there are a number of questions that still have to be answered not only whether or not assad carried out that chemical attack but also who owns the chemical weapons at the moment inside syria. paul you're joining us now from lebanon and that's a country that has been caught up in the growing syrian crisis or what are you hearing from people in beirut about very country's role and fears regarding the conflict just next door well i spent several hours this afternoon in the palestinian camp here in beirut

weapons of mass destruction were. you know there's clear weapons there's one other point about timing that i think is very important to make and that is the the timing of this alleged chemical strike just at the time of the the u.n. team is already there in damascus and clearly able to go and then the timing of the the assad regime soon yes to the request to go visit the site no it is simply not explainable it's not explicable in any way shape or form the assad regime would carry out a chemical strike and then allow the u.n. to go in and take samples to prove that it exists that was gareth porter an investigative journalist and historian and richard murphy former u.s. ambassador to syria. and then financial news today talk about mis management of funds now in two thousand and eight darrell lane woods a chairman of a small missouri bank received one million dollars after applying to the united states treasury for bailout money under the troubled asset relief program however just days after main street bank receive the

all extraordinarily harshly if we turned a blind eye to a dictator's wanton use of weapons of mass destruction against all warnings, against all common understanding of decency. these things we do know. >> john kerry's extremely strong statement this afternoon seemed to leave almost zero doubt the white house intended to act unilaterally in syria with a military strike, but then rather confusingly, it was almost immediately followed up with a statement from the president, himself, at an event with baltic leaders that if not substantively opposed to kerry, the opposite in tone. >> the world has an obligation to make sure that we maintain the norm against the use of chemical weapons. now, i have not made a final decision about various actions that might be taken to help enforce that norm. i have had my military and our team look at a wide range of options. without considering any open-ended commitment, we're not considering any boots-on-the-ground approach. what we will do is consider options that meet the narrow concern about chemical weapons, understanding that there's not going to be a solely

let's remember weapons of mass destruction 10 years ago. is that a false comparison?it is a very good comparison, especially the communication strategy of russia. there is a war of images and words going on at the moment. it is very much a fight for the media for winning over the media . of course, russia's best card, remember what happened in iraq. this is a weakness, this is a weak point in the u.s. communication strategy and the legitimacy of whatever decision -- >> premature. i want to stick to the iraq, we have quite a few tweets comparing this countdown, but not a countdown. here is another one. deja vu, the west is trying to present a smoking gun. the truth will prove them wrong again. >> let's keep in mind -- >> it was totally false. >> let's keep in mind. we are pretty sure there are hundreds of chemical weapons in syria. it is not a secret. we know there are lots of weapons, and there is no debate about that. the fact that we have seen this horrific videos from last week is proof that there are weapons of mass destruction. >> the inspection team is only ther

this and i have brothers they're alleged to have used weapons of mass destruction you know and those are pressure cookers so it can really move whatever you want it to mean and if for some reason now's the time that they want to do it they'll do it but hopefully that's not what they want to do so you know we'll see we'll see what happens let me ask you has on the same thing in damascus i mean the other side is this the side that the united states and its western allies want to empower. i don't think that their problem is really syria per se as much as. they are they're really becoming hysterical for the for what's appearing to be a new world order starting to happen or starting to shape in the middle east then they cannot bear the idea that their alliance that they decided to take. for in the in the early two thousand towards two thousand and one with the with the extreme islamist governments and install installed. puppet governments around the middle east that that alliance is not really working well and it's now a serious serious risk of collapsing there's the there's the alliance

weapons hysteria has been leading the corporate news coverage but syria's possible weapon of mass destruction is not the only source of national security fear and duce by the corporate press of course we can't forget about the big other scary beast in the middle east see for yourself. brooke has issued a blunt new warning tonight to iran about nuclear weapons and a.b.c.'s chief global affairs correspondent martha raddatz is in the middle east to tell us what happened tonight and what it means under rolen international sanctions aren't connecting the iranian people but not impacting the nuclear program to some engines or having an impact on the police to this point the sanctions those four have not induced a change in. government policy there may be some disagreements on how far along but on the fundamental question do the israelis trust the president obama would if necessary use the military option he says they're shoulder to shoulder you know it's astonishing that on the tenth anniversary of a preemptive invasion of a sovereign nation based on known lies we're seeing the exact same thing hap

like the futures and the ultra etfs of mass destruction. things that can cause the performance of stocks to become disconnected of the performance of the underlying companies much more commoditized. but there's one more risk you need to know about if you're going to invest in a dangerous chopping market or one that suddenly turns like that. it's that the life guard is off duty. and when you go swimming in this market, you better remember there's nobody out there making sure the water is safe. the s.e.c. which should be working to level the playing field in order to protect the little guy, they don't think it's their job anymore. at least that's my opinion. the regulators seem to favor, for instance, high-frequency traders, hft over the ordinary home gamer like you. these high-frequence guys now make about 80% of all trades. there you go, huh. this is the market you're really dealing with. we need -- we need an s.e.c. that protects the unsophisticated from these rapacious capitalists. instead we've got one captured by the exchanges and abets

going to respond to people who use weapons of mass destruction and sutdly chemical weapons are used and the u.s. doesn't do anything. then they'll decide our interests don't line up with the americans maybe we need to look to the russians. if the united states isn't going to follow through on its word on the use of weapons of mass destruction, maybe they aren't going to follow through on other things. it has implications on how the u.s. deals with iran and north korea and effect on what the u.s. does with other countries and competition with russia and others. >> is there any possibility assad's military acted with the use of chemical weapons without his knowledge? he knows that that would be the trigger point for u.s. intervention, no? >> i think that's a great question. i think on the one hand, it's hard to imagine he would have done this. but at a certain point it doesn't matter. it could be his grandson tripped over something in the bedroom and chemical weapons went off and o a rogue military demander decided to use chemical weapons. what's important is that all of that is sort

. >> we were told there were weapons of mass destruction in iraq, and there weren't. and the u.k. public is nervous about jumping into situations that require military force. >> this is a pleat embarrassment for the obama administration. here's obama trying to gather an ally or two for a pinprick and he gets nothing. >> the president of the united states has said for a year, assad has to go. now we're in a position to actually make him go, and we've decided no, we're not going to do that? that's because there's no stranstran strategy. they have no idea what they're doing. >> former secretary of defense donald rumsfeld joins us. how significant is it that the british have voted no to the go along with us should we do a military strike, at least not for the moment. >> well, as it is has been said, humiliating. it is a direct result of the confused and lead from behind posture that our country has taken under the obama administration. the fact that there have not been a mission defined leaves people with confusion and unwillingness to be supportive. unless we state, it's true not jus

of syria he said that russia is of course against the use of chemical weapons and weapons of mass destruction but in this particularly we need to wait and see for the u.n. to do their job for the investigation to come forward and as that russia's position has always been then act in a lawful matter as a global community now one of the things he says is that it is ridiculous that the assad regime used weapons chemical weapons against his own people saying that under these circumstances it just doesn't call for it let's listen to what he had to say on that subject. syrian government forces are advancing in some areas they have surrounded the rebels to think that in such a time they would give a trump card for those calling for intervention. now as the u.n. chemical weapons inspection team has just left syria we haven't heard anything back yet and he says that if the proof of chemical weapons has not yet been presented it means that there isn't any now the other thing is he spoke about his surprise about the british government who met over this past week to debate the idea of intervention in syr

again it's all about weapons of mass destruction. only makes things worse. mission. cretaceous free. free. free. free. free. free blog. a freebie. but i was sleeping it was around six am. but what i remember hearing like someone breaking the law. although you know i was surrounded by people with machine guns helmets stuff you see in movies. they examined my mouth seemed to many james bond movies i thought i had signed up there. they told me i was under arrest i asked for a while they said you know. cubans busted here in the united states spying for fidel are they terrorists or freedom fighters. do you know the cubans i. went to those guys that did play to us in the semifinals of the pan american games in the basketball tournament the five cuban five were defending their country against terrorists the other cuban five other that's also been americans you know i haven't ever heard about the cuban five there that rock band right. i mean you know to cuban five. would you want to find out ok. ok the police are looking for you to deal with the terrorist groups in miami's o