and our fellow player and friend massoud may well not be talking about that in the t.v. interview they are about to give the official reason for medina's dismissal was their alleged absence from training sessions the afghan football association fired 8 other players as well the team faces an uncertain future an issue not addressed in the media since the abrupt end of her playing career medina has been concentrating on our work as a coach. what intern i went to with that that was my 1st tournament i scored 7 goals or not it was 18 months ago when i got my coaching license. so i suppose the coach and the top scorer in the national team. it was a gunshot i was on. didn't. know. that dear viewers today we are happy to welcome 2 young women to the show football coach. and player master may. 4th. public appearances are not uncommon for medina she uses these opportunities to promote women's football while getting no support from the sports authorities. on and on the ticket to. right after their appearance on t.v. the young women post photos and social media. has almost 3000 fol

campaign, the role of foreign intelligence services like the australians and downere mysterious joseph massoud, republicans do want to find out what happened and the facts that john durham has been able to get to downer and get him to talk is encouraging. >> martha: is there anything out there except for the fact that he said no, that there was no big block? >> that we won't know. one of the big questions is -- remember the fury when bill barr said there have been spying in the campaign and a lot of democrats said that was just way out of line but look, we know the fbi used human informants, we know that they sent somebody who -- but have to be call this by with the alias as to go get information out of george papadopoulos, we know they were doing this, and the point of the derm investigation is to find out do we know everything or was there more? >> martha: it strikes me when you look ahead to tomorrow, when he going to occur and you have both sides presented their case, you have cross examination, you also have a judge was sort of running things and setting on the rules so that it's fair to

well, in particular one, also that the fbi wasn't working with this multi-professor named joseph massoud, who had made an offer of assistance and coordination to a former campaign official name george papadopoulos. >> it does, though, mention christopher steele, i understand, at fairly great length. what does it say about him? >> i think one of the takeaways from christopher steele, it's understanding that the i.g. isn't going to say that the fbi shouldn't have used this political research. but i think what will come out is that, you know, the way that steele was portrayed in this application, this warrant, you know, this surveillance application was misleading. some of the information was just flat-out wrong. >> all right. adam, stick around if you will. i want to bring in cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin, phil mudd, former fbi senior intelligence adviser and former cia counterterrorism official, and our counterterrorism analyst. a lot of titles for you, phil. still you're going to have to wait because i'm going to go to jeffrey first. what do you make of this? this is one of the

that's wrong that this professor named joseph massoud who's been talked about who had met with a trumpampaign adviser sort of being controlled by the fbi is sort of a setup plot. that's wrong. and now we know that the leaders of the fbi didn't politicize the investigation, the russia investigation, and nor did they try to infiltrate the campaign. >> tell us more about this man who investigates the investigators, michael horwitz i understand he's a democrat, he's an obama appointee. tell us more about him. >> michael horwitz is a well-respected figure in the law enforcement community and in the department of justice. and he does tough investigations. he's known to be fair but tough. he did that previously on how the fbi acted in 2016. he certainly didn't give the leadership of the fbi a pass in how they handled the hillary clinton investigation, in particularly that press conference comey held in july of 2016 or the letters that were sent to congress. in fact he called comey insubordinate. he was certainly rough and beat it up. horwitz has a real responsibility here, a real responsibili

well, in particular, one, also that the fbi wasn't working with this multiprofessor named joseph massoudho made a contribution to george p papadopoul papadopoulos. >> what does it say about delorean? steele? >> it's our understanding the ig isn't going to say that the fbi shouldn't, you know, have used this political research. but i think what will come out is that, you know -- you know, the way that steele was portrayed in this application, this warrant, you know, this surveillance application was misleading. some of the information was just flat out wrong. >> adam, stick around, if you will. i want to bring in jeffrey toobin. former cia counterterrorism official phil and our counter terrorism analyst. a lot of titles for you, phil. still you have to wait. jeffrey first. what do you make of this? i mean this, is one of the things the president and allies have talked about for some time. this campaign was launched on false premises, this report does not find that. >> including during the impeachment hearings. and the phrase that keeps -- that i think of when i read adam's brilliant repor

22 plots have been foiled by the intelligence agency since march 2017, if we remember the khalid massoud. the intelligence has managed to prevent a lot of serious terrorist attacks through organisations like the joint terrorism centre which is designed to collect appreciation of different pieces of a ten —— intelligence across the system. intelligence and generally strong, and i think community engagement is also very important in counterterrorism. potentially, there could be an issue about the management and handling of people who are convicted of one offence to prevent them convicting future offences, and a lot of that is presumably about the mechanics of prison, probation and sentencing. absolutely. in this case, we have seen absolutely. in this case, we have seen that the original sentence was indeterminate. i understand that in 2013 that was changed to a six—year sentence, and then automatically after half of that the prisoner was released, so after eight years. i know the prime minister has paid particular attention to this issue. that's what we need to look at. perhaps we need to