first, we go to the report masuda did for democracy now!she made her way to afghanistan from pakistan while investigating the killing of her family. >> there were women and children running for their lives, being shot at by helicopter hovering over their homes. people were not taliban supporters. they were not al qaeda fighters. they were simple afghans trying to stay safe in their own country. september 11 really made me angry. but meeting these people and what they went through, it makes me angry as well. war, yet towar -- in break a couple of eggs to make an omeltte. >> i was on the 15th floor and ran to my neighbors house. she has a clear view of downtown manhattan. i looked out her window and saw the second plane hit the second building and it dawned on me, my brother works there. i went down to the hospitals to see if his name was on the list. and then i realized he had died. because he had stayed behind to stay with his quadriplegic brother -- i'm sorry, friend, who could not get out although he was on the 27th floor and he could hav

they kill people but so does air pollution and for this cancer masuda's reckless driving.what happens with regards to mexico and drugs coming to the country is a matter fit for the criminal law. it is a criminal activity. it is not the sponsorship and using weapons against the united states. >> so it is probably the motivation of the attack -- >> there's a distinction between using an armed attack and simply exporting to a country substances that may cause people who wish to consume the product great harm including death, two different things create no more than the united states. when the export of cigarettes to a foreign country and that they cause cancer and that causes people to die that would be justified. a significant difference. the armed attack been something very different than simply selling substances that may cause harm. >> i think that the aspect of your point is how this thinking about drones is diluting the idea of when and where you can use guidelines and when not. in july of 2001, the ambassador said that this country was morally and legally opposed to th