commissioner matsuda? >> i have one more question. under the active or pending cases are there any other properties that we need to know that may need special attention on expedited attention. like we made special attention to that. are there other properties that we need to know about or the potential to have any challenges head of them? >> tim fry, department staff. not that i'm aware of. i would say out of all the pending properties, i think one of the most pressing concerns we have is about the condition of the mother's building. but as i mentioned recently the rec's park department along with the arts commission has submitted a fund committee proposal to do a condition's assessment on that property which will be done this year and we hope to bring that report to the commission once it's ready and they finalize it. we are looking to how much seismic intervention is required to keep this building occupied and standing and that may affect your decisions on how to pursue that designation in the future. >> commissioner johnck? >> echo

commissioner matsuda? >> is there a need for us to add another condition to the conditions of approval to maybe do an interim site visit from the department? rather than just upon occupancy? if there is a concern about compliance? >> tim fry, planning department. i would deserve to the architects to figure what that logical frame would be an a permanent site visit and if the commissioner would like to include that for approval. >> i would like to hear from staff. >> shelley kaltsroni. there is quite of bit of work. if you would alter the condition to maybe tie the inspecting the restoration work as it occurs at the beginning of their restoration work. i think that's where we would like to see the craftsmanship and materials up close. >> while you are there, one question on the on materials used was the east facing facade and why it was different from the other ones, not that quite visible, but it is. we have a staff request ? >> the sponsor is proposing to use the horizontal cable rail? it's a painted meta

. >> quickly commissioner matsuda, the new submittal requirement would not prevent anyone from submitting information. >> maybe we can use more encouraging words. encourages early submittal so we can have more time to review. something like that. then i think that commissioner hasz touched on this under submittals for the hearing procedures. instead of like kind of limiting the time to 10 minutes or 1 minute. just make it more project specific and make it more to give more delegation to the president to determine specifically with speakers. sometimes there are a number of speakers who come out and even though they maybe in support of or opposed to certain things baunsd they -- because they come out we need to give them an opportunity to be heard. lastly on disclosures. does that need to follow it too. do we need to have a separate section to talk about disclosures? >> i thought i had seen it here but i don't see it. >> it talks about changes of disclosures for each item. >> we just went to a sort of code within our own commission. >> okay. do we need to codify that code? okay. i would rec