republican priorities, apparently, is now advancing a resolution led by marjorie taylor greene, matt gates and elise stefanic which is designed to allegedly exonerate donald trump from the events of january 6 and the violent insurrection. this is what they're focused on. with all of the challenges facing the american people, house republican leadership apparently once again directed by donald trump has chosen to focus their energies, not on the economy, not on public safety or the border or on america's national security interests but on trying to exonerate donald trump. you can't make this up. the american people concluded this is a do nothing republican congress not acting in america's best interest. [inaudible question] hakeem: we'll have discussions about ways we can in a comprehensive fashion break our broken immigration system and address the clear and present challenges that exist on the border. over the last few weeks, we've been convening in an informal way with stakeholders all across the house democratic caucus to discuss a path forward to address the challenges at the border an

i mean, when i came to moscow and spoke to congressman matt gates, because i was just about to testify. i mean, he's a sitting congressman on the intelligence committee, and he told me, tara, i know how these people operate. and your personal safety is at risk. you're better off to stay where you are. what is sitting congressman tells you that your life is at risk as an, as you know, i just had, i was stunned. i never thought my own country. my own government would be going after me for telling the truth, tara, we leave it there for now, but we will speak on this just after the prove. if you'd stay with us at tar reed r t country, peter speaking live on our t and not it isn't data where we have to leave and the broadcasts for now. i because of timing and let's see what's up next. this is 247 are the introduction the . the brush remains the only colonial empire that still exists in the mountain welled comprised of both its colonies, disguise, disapprove of seas territories, numerous officially silver and african states. the full under frances, so called from the freak sphere of influenc

you read the most ardent trumpians in the house of representatives, it is margery talley green or matt gates, they generally say that there is a conspiracy, that means about these transnational corporations, well, that are engaged in armaments, and the fact that they called mainstream media. that is, such traditional powerful mass media that they are pushing america to the third world war, that they somehow distort the situation in ukraine, that putin is not so bad in fact, that you can agree on something with him, that is, practically we see, you know, was such a film, the manchurian candidate, well, actually as a person who was put in power by the other side in order to destroy another country, we see uh... either trump is going this way on purpose or he is just trying to use anything and wants to show that he can solve some conflicts, including in russia and between russia and ukraine, they use all this rhetoric, and it is a pity that most of the republicans fell for such and such rhetoric, this is the first moment, the second moment, we see that the independents are still hesitating, and

even sean hannity ones mixed up the names of jason chaffetz and matt gates. okay.are you going to put me in the category of this guy that couldn't remember hamas and is speaking to dead people? a guy that doesn't even remember the rosary where it came from that is so special to him? these are not insignificant moments, peter, as i think you know. you are one of the few people willing to delve into this and get to that touchy subject. is the white house still pushing back hard? any feeling among some that if this is what robert hur concluded, this is what they are telling everybody behind the scenes privately. in other words, my sources tell me he really is in this bad condition. that's what they tell me. some. >> reporter: i don't know how it is when you go out and about, but basically everywhere i go and somebody talks to me about white house coverage or joe biden, they are asking is he really going to be the nominee? is he going to make it? will he continue until election day? if not, what happens? we don't know what's going to happen. you see something like this

matt gaetz. he serves on the house judiciary committee. congressman gates your colleague, ken buck, was on cnn. he suggested last night that people close to the investigation in the congress would've known that smirnoff had credibility issues. listen to what he said >> we were warned at the time that we received the document outlining this witness's testimony, we were warned that the credibility of this statement was not known, and yet, people my colleague this one out and talk to the public about how this was credible and how it was damning and how it proved president biden's at the time vice president biden's complicity in receiving bribes is that true >> i personally debrief the whistleblower who initially identified this 1023 alleging a bribe with the biden family, and that whistleblower told us at the time that he did not know whether or not that bribe had actually been consummated, but merely the existence of a 1023 that the fbi wasn't providing to congress warranted further review. now, when we initially asked for this 1023, we were told by the department of justice, it's got all these n

and he brought up the sorted allegations against matt gaetz once again for it looks like ethics committee investigation into gatese mays is being opposed by a former chief of staff from her own office. are both of those rights as the ethics investigation back up and nancy mace facing opposition from within? >> nancy mace does have a primary challenger i am not sure her former chief of staff is actually going to take on his former boss even though that was something he was weighing in talking to consultants about. he has not pulled the trigger on that. but nancy mace is facing a challchallenger from someone she knows down the state named templeton and templeton is trying to run against her record and might be getting help from kevin mccarthy allies so there is that. as for matt gaetz we do know the ethics investigation is continuing i do not think we'll be seeing the results of that anytime soon those investigations tend to take a lot longer than usually the committee wants. some of it relies on them volunteering offering information. >> i am sure there is a harder job in the world, olivia than the one you have bu

first case out of the gate is the weakest one, the alvin bragg one, the one that "the new york times" said has never been prosecuted in new york state law for a federal election. >> matt: remember, the way they make felonies -- they take an assortment of misdemeanors that the only victim would be donald trump himself from the falsification of these business records that are alleged. then, they take this federal campaign violation that both the federal election commission and the southern district of new york looked at and already decided it wasn't a valid legal theory to go on. the american people are going to see this up close. i just wish that it was televised so they could see how poorly this legal theory and these facts are going to play out under alvin bragg and his cockamamie idea. >> kayleigh: gregg, we wait for any day now the ruling on the colorado ballot disqualification from the supreme court. jack smith was given until tomorrow to file a response on absolute immunity. he filed that last week. are we looking at potentially supreme production this week week on either of those cases? -- supreme court action this week on either of those cases? >> on wednesday,