there will be a conversation with matt wiener. you can watch it on c-span. supreme court oral arguments in a case questioning whether police have the right itself on data without the use of a warrant. the case centers around a man who was arrested in 2007 on suspicion of selling cocaine. they looked at the contents of his cell phone, which led to a search of his home. drugs and a weapon were found. this oral argument is one hour >> we'll hear argument next in case 13212, united states v. wurie. >> thank you, mr. chief justice, and may it please the court, the facts of this case, united states v. wurie, i think, illustrate why any categorical rule that would preclude searches of cell phones incident to arrest would be inconsistent with historical practice and detrimental to law enforcement. this a case where what the officers did was see a phone ringing. on the outside screen, the caller was identified as "my house." the officers opened up the phone, pressed one button to see that the call came in from "my house" and pressed another to see what the phone numb