matthew strugar, the lawyer for peta, if you would respond?it is a bizarre response that they say they're concerned about the safety of their employees and the rhetoric of animal rights activists when it was their own employee who had the most inflammatory rhetoric of any anti-seaworld activist that i've seen. we have this guy posting on social media that need to bring the pitchfork and torches to the demos, burn this place down, even encouraging activists to show up at seaworld vice president's house with all torrents late at night and keep them awake -- with bullhorns late at night and give them away. this guy was going to demonstrations saying, we knew to take increasingly militant action, increasingly urging people to ramp up their activity. so the bizarre thing is that the most inflammatory rhetoric and the most with elect the biggest threat to seaworld safety to its employees was its own employee in the situation. juan: will potter, i want to ask you what is been the impact of the campaign of peta to expose the mistreatment of fish at se