matthew sweet- me, but let's speak to dr. matthew sweet over here.i just hope this no sort of chinese sort of cancer virus and that we don't have to rush this thing. that's all i'm worried aieai. — thing. that's all i'm worried aieai. se— thing. that's all i'm worried about. so you— thing. that's all i'm worried about. so you want- “kg that's all i'm worried about. so you want the appropriate time ? yeah, just appropriate time? yeah, just let's it do appropriate time? yeah, just iei-s—ii-ne ii| let's just check it out. do it pnepeniw. — let's just check it out. do it properlv- i'm_ let's just check it out. do it properly. i'm sure- let's just check it out. do it properly. ”iii: would properly. i'm sure they. would you— properly. i'm sure they. would wen nake— properly. i'm sure they. would you iake p,— properly. i'm sure they. would you take it, though,— properly. i'm sure they. would you take it, though, in- properly. ”iii: would you take it, though, in the long properly. ”iii: would ycit take it, though, in the long properly. ”iii: would ycit was,

matthew sweet- me, but let's speak to dr. matthew sweet over here.that's all i'm worried assai. ss— thing. that's all i'm worried about. so you— thing. that's all i'm worried about. so you want- “g that's all i'm worried about. so you want the appropriate time ? yeah, just appropriate time? yeah, just let's it do appropriate time? yeah, just iei-s—ii-iss ii| let's just check it out. do it properly- — let's just check it out. do it properlv- i'm_ let's just check it out. do it properly. i'm sure- let's just check it out. do it properly. ”i: would properly. i'm sure they. would you— properly. i'm sure they. would ysa iake— properly. i'm sure they. would ysa iane n,— properly. i'm sure they. would you take it, though,— properly. i'm sure they. would you take it, though, in- properly. ”i: would you take it, though, in the long properly. ”i: would ycit take it, though, in the long properly. ”i: would ycit was, it, though, in the long properly. ”i: would ycit was, like,ough, in the long properly. ”i: would ycit was, like, safe? 1the long properly. ”i: woul

matthew sweet- me, but let's speak to dr. matthew sweet over here.all i'm worried ahouh so— thing. that's all i'm worried about. so you— thing. that's all i'm worried about. so you want- “3 that's all i'm worried about. so you want the appropriate time ? yeah, just appropriate time? yeah, just let's it do appropriate time? yeah, just reds—h-uo hl let's just check it out. do it properdy. — let's just check it out. do it properlv- i'm_ let's just check it out. do it properly. i'm sure- let's just check it out. do it properly. ”cl would properly. i'm sure they. would you— properly. i'm sure they. would you dare— properly. i'm sure they. would you take h.— properly. i'm sure they. would you take it, though,— properly. i'm sure they. would you take it, though, in- properly. ”cl would you take it, though, in the long properly. ”cl would ycit take it, though, in the long properly. ”cl would ycit was, it, though, in the long properly. ”cl would ycit was, like,ough, in the long properly. ”cl would ycit was, like, safe? 1the long properly. ”cl would ycit was,

matthew sweet's going that wrong? is that right? . matthew sweet's going-clip that wrong? t gb news. excellent when he ursoerees— disagrees with someone. he's an excellent—nes- excellent journalist. that was my satire there, my putin point was satire there, guys, bit of satire guys, but a little bit of satire there. probably won't guys, but a little bit of satire theiit. unfortunately,rly won't guys, but a little bit of satire theiit. unfortunately, he ivon't guys, but a little bit of satire theiit. unfortunately, he won't. get it. unfortunately, he won't. errone— get it. unfortunately, he won't. prune-year.- get it. unfortunately, he won't. private _yeah, yeah. . get it. unfortunately, he won't. i private _yeah, yeah. not private eye. oh, yeah, yeah. not so much of a fan of me these days anyway, we'll get the days anyway, we'll get to the story you worry. it's story and you don't worry. it's very actually. very important, actually. kyiv, as it, is as i still pronounce it, is willing to discuss the future of crimea moscow if forces crimea with moscow if forces reached borde

matthew sweet's going that wrong? is that right? . matthew sweet's going-clip that wrong? t gb news. excellent when he ursoerees— disagrees with someone. he's an excellent—nes- excellent journalist. that was my satire there, my putin point was satire there, guys, bit of satire guys, but a little bit of satire there. probably won't guys, but a little bit of satire theiit. unfortunately,rly won't guys, but a little bit of satire theiit. unfortunately, he ivon't guys, but a little bit of satire theiit. unfortunately, he won't. get it. unfortunately, he won't. errone— get it. unfortunately, he won't. prune-year.- get it. unfortunately, he won't. private _yeah, yeah. . get it. unfortunately, he won't. i private _yeah, yeah. not private eye. oh, yeah, yeah. not so much of a fan of me these days anyway, we'll get the days anyway, we'll get to the story you worry. it's story and you don't worry. it's very actually. very important, actually. kyiv, as it, is as i still pronounce it, is willing to discuss the future of crimea moscow if forces crimea with moscow if forces reached borde

the kind of trade-off that matthew was talking about is something that is the source of constant discussion as we try to find the sweet spot between achieving the consequences for security that we all want without the unintended consequences. >> i want to go one more twist on this particular question of these trade-offs. in the rush ukraine conflict, the moral calculus is pretty clear. russia is the aggressor, everyone is on the side of ukraine. western policy is clear. i can imagine other conflicts arising between countries where some western countries have an interest in supporting one or another. not only you come up and western companies as well provide security services find themselves in the uncomfortable position of you i take aside? do i stay neutral? how would you imagine a situation between a war between two countries and africa? >> we are fundamentally computer scientists not political scientists. when situations like that happen, we have to reach out to the people who are the experts. in that situation, we would reach out to we are u.s.-based company, we would reach out to the u.s. department of state, the

the kind of trade-off, that matthew was talking about, is something that is a source of constant discussion as we try to find that sweetbetween achieving the consequences for security that we all want, without the unintended consequences. >> jake, i do not want to leave you out of the discussion, i want one more twist on this particular question of these trade-offs. because, in the russia ukraine conflict, i think the moral compass is pretty clear. russia is the aggressor, everyone is on the side of ukraine. western policy is clear, the moral imperatives are not very arguable. i can imagine all sorts of other conflicts arising between other countries, where, maybe some western countries have an interest in supporting one of the other. cloudflare has customers in both. you, not only you, but the company as well that provides circuitous -- find themselves in a position, do i take aside? do i take away protection services from this government, or institution, or that governments institutions. do i stay neutral? how would you, imagine a situation like that, between i don't know a war between two countries in africa, where