but a new report in the "new york times" magazine by matthieu aikins of the "nation institute" castsbt on the motivations of the afghan troops who told the americans that the hospital was a taliban stronghold. i spoke with aikins yesterday, and with two former military attorneys; i began by asking the reporter what may have motivated this attack. >> from the extensive reporting we did starting from november, as well as documents that are buried in the military's docket report, there's evidence that afghan fors may have provided an exact description that masmed the hospital as a target, meaning that they intentionally targeted the hospital, leading to u.s. forces perhaps unintentionally striking the hospital as a result of that description. >> sreenivasan: so why would afghan forces want to strike a hospital? >> there's been a long-simmering tension between m.s.f. and the afghan government, basquely a collision between two different world views. m.s.f., which sees itself as a neutral humanitarian medical organization that treats all sides to a conflict, regardless of who they are, and