. >> mauney parents and in some ways going up in segregated birmingham was a bit of an advantage because you were in a totally segregated school, segregated principles black, teachers are black, then when the teacher says to you that's just not good enough there wasn't any racial overtone people could be fairly tough in terms of insisting on the achievement and on excellence without racial overtone somehow of being racist. one of the most interesting things that happened when i was at stanford was i suddenly realized that there is a subtle -- president bush called it bigotry of expectation that creeps in when people see black students, and all of a sudden they have had a tough time and so maybe i shouldn't say anything about that and i tell you related in the book i noticed i went to my first phi beta kappa ceremonious provost in 1994, and at stanford in this group for the 300 phi beta kappa there was one black student. i thought this is really odd. sorted looking at it and thinking about it and we formed a group called partners and academic excellence and we asked black graduate student

they passed section of 342 of the dodd-frank wall street protection act to cover the rest of the mauney. justin did january 21st of this year section 342 covers all of the agencies and departments of the federal government that are involved in the business of the economic recovery. specifically the treasury department and the fdic from each of the federal reserve banks, the national credit union administration and the security exchange commission among others. each of these agencies and departments must and can office of minority and women inclusion that will implement the law which states that minorities and women and entities of owned by them must participate to the maximum extent possible in the business of the agency and those contracting in the sale of assets. investment banking firms, asset management firms, consultants, lawyers and many other types of professional service providers are specifically cited. what impact could this have on the minority community if properly implemented and in first? first we believe section 342 could be a vehicle for wealth creation for minority and

they passed section of 342 of the dodd-frank wall street protection act to cover the rest of the mauney. justin did january 21st of this year section 342 covers all of the agencies and departments of the federal government that are involved in the business of the economic recovery. specifically the treasury department and the fdic from each of the federal reserve banks, the national credit union administration and the security exchange commission among others. each of these agencies and departments must and can office of minority and women inclusion that will implement the law which states that minorities and women and entities of owned by them must participate to the maximum extent possible in the business of the agency and those contracting in the sale of assets. investment banking firms, asset management firms, consultants, lawyers and many other types of professional service providers are specifically cited. what impact could this have on the minority community if properly implemented and in first? first we believe section 342 could be a vehicle for wealth creation for minority and

and my her view, to go through all of this again, mauney view was the important thing about 1441 is itsaid the final opportunity and what is more is it specified what constituted a breach, namely the failure of the unconditionally and immediately to comply with the u.n. inspectors. as we believed that out of this week of a resolution of this balanced and then became a continuing debate the next two or three months. stacks of there was no disagreement between you and him about the objectives that were supposed to be achieved the bid at the end of it he said one specific objective of rising use of force without these to further resolution had not been achieved and that must have been a disappointment to you, but we should probably -- >> more than that. we would have to make sure that they did. as i said, i have no recollection of the specific instructions going out after that meeting but i am sure i would have said you have to make sure it does meet that the objective. >> but he is saying that at the end eight didn't. >> as i just pointed out to do the resolution did evil even after the

. >> mauney question is about bills [inaudible] i wonder if this has had unintended consequences i wondered it violated [inaudible] >> the members take an oath to support the constitution and so i don't think it's beyond the realm of sensitivity that the somehow be obliged to let least acknowledge the fact whatever they are trying to do as a constitutional basis otherwise they can't do it. if it's not part of the constitution they really are not allowed to do it, they shouldn't be allowed. the constitution is very broad in that since there are limitations as to what the federal government can do or not do. >> here is what gets overlooked, and we get kind of sucked into the notion that only the supreme court can say what the constitution requires. that's not true. they may have the final word where there is a dispute, but everyone who is a constitutional officer of this government has a right, i think a constitutional right to see what the constitution needs with regard to their actions. >> i agree. >> so if i want to introduce a piece of legislation that says that we should vanish from u.s.