this slide discusses maximal restraint technique, is that right? >> that is correct. >> is there a particular device that is used to accomplish the maximal restraint technique? >> yes, sir, it is the rip restraint or the rip hobble. >> can you please describe the technique to the jury? >> yes, sir. if you have a subject that is handcuffed behind her back generally, if that's the way we like to handcuffed people and they continue to cause a threat to you or other people or themselves, we have our offices to use the maxims technique which is to take a nylon strap with a clamp on it and you and wrapped that around their legs and then connected to the front of the body if possible, like a belt loop or a second restraint around the waist and that dims the likes of the legs are no longer a threat to kick out at you, kind up with her legs and about a 90° angle so you're not able to extend the legs out to clicky kick you is that arafat. >> you are aware of the use of the maximal strength technique is governed by mpd policy? >> yes, sir. >> and that is five

nelson: in terms of the maximal restraint technique? you were describing the use of the maximal street on - - strength technique? >> yes. nelson: sometimes they are to escalate the use of force in certain circumstances. >> yes. nelson: and de-escalate. >> yes sir. nelson: if the officer decides use maximum restraint and then against it for a medical situation or a lack of resistance, would that be a de-escalation of use of force? >> yes. nelson: is it more or less difficult to render medical aid to someone in maximum restraint technique? >> probably a little more difficult. nelson: with the use of force and then to use bodyweight. >> that could be higher escalation of force. someone in the position as a de-escalating technique. >> yes sir. nelson: in terms with the use of force and deciding how much force should be used. >> that is a consideration. nelson: as well as the presence of other officers. >> yes sir. nelson: use of force in any circumstance depending on the situation. >> yes sir. nelson: when using force they have to employ th

can you describe what the maximal restraint technique is the cons are the maximal restraint technique is has often been referred to as hobble and that is a. it's a method if officers are dealing with a typically a combative or aggressive person in order to protect them or even property it's placing. basically attaching a. record of the ladies to the waist to 6 so that the person the individual does not have free movement of the relays so it securing them again for use it by their ankles. if you're prone bringing that up to your waist in securing it. the maximal restraint technique or the hobble though if it's used a supervisor has to respond to the scene you cannot transport anyone prone in that position due to the risk of. breathing and so but that is the concert that would be my understanding of the m r t the maximum restraint technique so you talk a little bit in terms of the use of force how officers are kind of reevaluating their use of force from time to time we should be restraint and so if officers decide to use the maximal restraint technique and then decide hey we know or an

. >> now, we didn't talk about the maximal restraint technique. you're familiar with the policies surrounding that? >> yes. >> i'm going to show to you what's been admitted as exhibit 225. can you describe what the maximal restraint technique is? >> yes. counselor, the maximal restraint technique is -- has often been referred toe as the hobble. and that is a -- it's a method of if officers are dealing with typically a combative or aggressive person, in order to protect them or even property, it's placing basically attach ing a cord of the legs to the waist so the person, the individual does not have free movement of their legs. so it's securing them, again, usually by their ankles. if you're prone, bringing that up to your waist and securing it. the maximal restraint technique or the hobble, if it's used, a supervisor has to respond to the scene. you cannot transport anyone prone in that position due to the risk of the breathing. and so -- but that is -- counselor, that would be my understanding of the mrt, or the maximal restraint technique. >> s

this slide discusses the maximal restraint technique is that right that's. is there another is or particular device that's used to accomplish the maximum restraint technique yes or it's the rip restraint of the republican. can you please describe the maximal restraint technique to the german yes or if you have a subject that is handcuffed behind their back generally and that's the way we like to help people and they continue to. cause a threat to you are other people or themselves we. have taught our officers to use the maximum restraint technique which is taking this rep restraint which is a nylon strap with a clamp on it and you would wrap it around their legs and then connect it to the front of the body if possible belt loop or or a 2nd restraint around their waist and what that does is it bends their legs so that their legs are no longer a threat to kick out of you kind of put their legs in about a 90 degree angle so they're not be able to extend the way exult to kick you if there are threats are you aware that the use of the maximal restraint technique

this slide discusses the maximal restraint technique. is that right?at's correct. >> is there a particular device that's used to accomplish the maximal restraint technique. >> the rip restraint or rip hobble. >> can you please describe the maximal restraint technique to the jury? >> yes, sir. if you have a subject that is handcuffed behind their back generally, and that's the way we like to handcuff people, and they continue to cause a threat to you or other people or themselves, we have taught our officers to use the maximal restraint technique, which is taking this rip restraint, dwhih is a nylon strap with a clamp on it and you would wrap that around their legs and connect it to the front of the body, if possible, like a belt loop or a second restraint around their waist. what that does is it depends their legs so the legs are no longer a threat to kick out at you. they're not able to extend the legs out to kick you if they are a threat. >> are you aware that the use of the maximal restraint technique is guided and governed by mpd policy? >> yes, si

in terms of the maximal restraint technique. you were describing the use of the maximal restraint technique yes or and again officers are trained to sometimes escalate the use of force in certain circumstances correct yes and deescalate the use of force in certain circumstances yes or if an officer decides initially to use the maximal restraint technique and then subsequently decides against it because of a medical situation or because of a lack of resistance or would that be a deescalation of the use of force yes. is it more or less difficult to render medical aid if someone is in a maximal restraint technique i would say it was probably a bit more difficult than but around that you would not be able to put them on their back for example it would be difficult yes. in terms of the use of force. part of the ground defense program is actually to use body weight as a form of the escalation of. its use of force that. maybe uses that higher escalation the force yes. but sometimes holding someone in a position can be a deescalating te

the maximal technique has often been referred to as the hobble. and that is a -- it's a method of if officers are dealing with a typically a combative or aggressive person, in order to protect them or property, it's placing basically attaching a -- a cord of the legs to the waist so that the person, the individual does not have free movement of their legs, so it's securing them, again, usually by their ankles if you're prone, bringing that up to your waist and securing it. the maximal restraint technique or the hobble, though, if it's used, a supervisor has to respond to the scene. you cannot transport anyone prone in that position due to the risks of the breathing. and so -- but that is the, counselor, that would be my understanding of the mrt or the maximal restraint technique. >> so you talked a little bit in terms of the use of force, how officers are kind of re-evaluating their use of force from time to time, right? >> yes. >> they should be at least, right? and so if officers decide to use the maximal restraint technique and then decide, hey

>> yes. >> the maximal restraint technique also requires supervisory reporting, is that right?> it does. >> if you could highlight section four -- three? you can see here by policy a supervisor, shelby called to the scene where the subject is restrained using mrt or hovel. >> yes. >> the supervisor, you'd have to go evaluate whether it was properly and necessarily used, is that right? >> yes. >> if you could highlight section b on the same page. >> after it used on an individual, and typically when it's used, it means the person is in the prone position, is that right? >> yes. >> at least initially to get on, can you explain what prone position is? >> flat on your stomach on the ground. >> once a hovel is used, to restrain the hands and feet in the prone position, what is the policy. >> with them in recovery position. >> what is the side recovery position? >> roll them on their side to ease their breathing. >> do you know why that is important? >> it helps them breathe better rather than having them on their chest, it gets them to their side to breathe easier. >> are you famili

my understanding is literature of somewhere between 18 to 28% is revenue maximizing. in other words, if you want to get the most revenue possible for the government, it should be somewhere in that range. if you go above that range, it's understanding you'll raise maybe less revenue because it curbs growth this isn't, it seems to me about maximizing revenue but about making the choice that there's a need or more of a desire for high income earners to pay the taxes in other words to fund the american families plan as posed to in order to maximize government revenue >> right there's competing reasons for all of this. there's some that want fairness and some that want revenue and some that as you point out are looking at what is the actual optimal rate to maximize revenue. you're right at a certain point whether that's above 28, whether it's 30, whether it's 40, it freezes sa assets you get people not selling, not i vesting because they want to wait for gnaw goa new governmen will reduce the rates. there is an optimal rate at which you will still have activity but you'll

an officer decides to use the maximal restraint or the hobble, right? but they've -- a medical emergency arises, and they call for ems. would it be consistent with the critical decisionmaking policy to say i'm not going to hobble this person because i know ems is on the way. >> objection, your honor. sid sidebar. >> all right. while they're in this sidebar, let's go back to bakari sellers to explain what's going on. bakari, another apparent legal dispute between the prosecution and the defense. >> yeah. you know, the prosecution is doing its yoman's work with this report attempting to show -- that's what we're seeing when you go through this report, you're attempting to show what should have been done. the fact that the knee should have been coming off the neck, they should have allowed george floyd to be detained, this usage of force should have stopped at that time. the defense is now going back and trying to pick apart that report. this report is very important because this is an expert opinion saying how the police should have behaved. and what this

. >> would you agree that a hobble is just sort of a brandname for a form of mrt or maximal restraint technique? >> yes. so, hobble four-point restraint, maximal restraint, there are specific brands like the rip hobble, but, yeah, these are all essentially the same concept we're talking about. >> and was the application of force by the officers without the hobble essentially a maximal restraint technique but without the use of that tool? >> to the extent the hobble would effectively immobilize someone and keep them from kicking, then what you see here are officers controlling mr. floyd's upper body, middle body and lower body, which would keep him from kicking. so, although not a perfect parallel, i would certainly describe it as a behavioral analog of a maximal restraint or a hobble-like technique. >> and when an individual is placed in a maximal restraint, the hobble, are they supposed to be placed in the side recovery position? >> absolutely. just like handcuffing. as soon as an individual is restrained, handcuffs or hobble, you get the person off their stomach, out of the prone re

this addresses the maximal restraint technique? >> that's correct. >> is there a particular device used to accomplish the technique? >> yes, sir. it's the rip. >> could you please describe it. >> if you have a subject handcuffed, behind their back generally, and that's how we like to handcuff people, and they continue to cause a threat to you or other people or themselves, we have taught our officers to use the maximal restraight technique which is a nylon strap with a clamp on it and wrap it around their legs. what that does is it puts their legs where they are not able to kick you. it extends the legs to a 90-degree angle where they are not able to kick you. >> do you know if the mrt is used in policy? >> yes. >> that's 5-316? >> yes. >> is there more than one device authorized to perform maximal restraint? >> i believe that the only one right now. >> so if an officer reasonably believes that a subject is thrashing, would you recommend that they use this maximal restraint technique to ensure their safety? >> yes, sir. >> and if t

. >> in terms of the maximal restraint technique, you were describing the use of the maximal restraint technique? >> yes, sir. >> and again, officers are trained to sometimes escalate the use of force in certain circumstances, correct? >> yes. >> and dees cacalate the use of force in certain circumstances? >> yes, sir. >> if an officer decides initially to use the maximal restraint technique and then subsequently decides against it because of a medical situation, or because of a lack of resistance, or -- would that be a deescalation of the use of force? >> yes. >> is it more or less difficult to render medical aid if someone is in the maximal restraint technique? >> i would say it was probably a little bit more difficult to -- on that? >> you would not be able to put them on their back, for example? >> it would be difficult, sir, yes. >> in terms of the use of force, part of the ground defense program is actually to use body weight as a form of deescalation, is it not? >> it's use of force that may be used instead of higher escalations of force, yes. >> but sometimes holding someone in

. >> in terms of the maximal restraint technique, you were describing the use of the maximal restraighten technique? >> yes, sir. >>ib and again, officers are trained if to sometimes escalate use of force in certain circumstances. correct? >> yes. >> and deescalate use of force in certain circumstances. >> yes, sir. >> if an officer decides initially to use the maximal restraint technique, and then subsequently decides against it -- because of a medical situation or because of a lack of resistance or -- would that be a deescalation of the use of force? >> yes. >> is it more or less difficult to render medical aid if someone is in the maximal restraighten technique? >> i would say it was probably a little bit more difficult. to maneuver around that. >> you would not be able to put them on their back, for example? >> it would be difficult, yes. >> in terms of the use of force, part of the ground defense program is actually to use body weight as a form of deescalation is it not? >> yes use of force that higher escalation of force, yes. >> but sometimes holding someone in a position can be a

or a hobble like technique. >> and when an individual is placed in a maximal restraint, the hobble, are they supposed to be placed in the side recovery position? >> absolutely. just like handcuffing, as soon a sin individual was restrained, handcuffs or hobble, get the person off their stomach off the prone restraint into a side recovery position. >> i'd like to then move to the next segment. >> if i may -- >> [inaudible] >> we can move to the next segment here, the next clip which is exhibit 47 beginning at 20:23:47. if you would publish that, please. >> will him on his side? [inaudible] >> please explain to the jury what you heard that was relevant in your analysis? >> the one officer is suggesting if they should roll mr. floyd onto his side and you hear the defendant say no, he's staying put. they are going to keep him in the prone restraint. >> what was the significance of that? >> it would indicate to a reasonable officer that at least one person there did not feel that mr. floyd presented the level of threat that required them to keep him and that prone restraint position. at

we use the maximal strain technique which is the nylon strap the clamp on it. and you would wrap it around her legs. then connected to the front of the body if possible. you get a belt loop or a second restraint run the raised at that vincent likes of the legs are no longer a threat to kick you type of thing. threaded 90 degrees angles angles not able to extend the legs out to kick you if they are a threat. >> are you aware that the use of the maximal straight technique is guided or recovered by policy pretty. >> yes it is pretty. >> five - 3016. it. >> yes. >> is a more than one device that is authorized to perform the maximal restraint technique greatest mckay believe it's just the rep hobble the one that we use. >> so if an officer reasonably believes that the subject is furnishing, which recommended the use this maximal technique to ensure their safety. >> yes. >> that they do so in accordance with the policies five - 316, the training. what is the officer need to do after the subject has been placed in this prone pretty. >> place them into a recovery posit

can you describe what the maximal restraint technique is? >> yes, counselor to the maximal strength technique is often referred to as the hollow. and that is, it's a method of if officers are digging with typically a combative or aggressive person, in order to protect them or property, it's placing basically attaching a court of the lakes to the waste so the individual does not have free movement of their legs so it is securing them again, usually by their ankles, if you are prone, bringing that up to your waist and securing it. the maximal restraint technique or the hobble, if it is used a supervisor has to respond to the scene. you cannot transport anyone prone in that position due to the risks of breathing. but that is, that would be my understanding of the mrt, the maximal restraint technique. >> so you talked a a little bn terms of the use of force, how officers are kind of reevaluating the use of force from time to time, right? should be a lease, right? so if officers decide to use the maximal restraint technique, and the decide hey, w

if a number of people involved in the attack, how do we maximize the impact? i understand why police are saying this was unlikely to be a terrorist incident. the knife tells me nobody sat back to maximize the event. >> i appreciate all three of you. thank you point. >> thank you. next our breaking news continues. we are live outside the hospital where one of those capitol police officers taken. where chief ramsey was telling you his condition. we'll hear exactly from the hospital. >>> another tragedy that the capitol police department endured. the trial of the ex-officer killing george floyd, top prosecutors delivering a devastating blow to their defense. >> what was your view during that time? >> totally unnecessary. >> a bomb shell report of congressman matt gaetz as one of his staffers quits tonight. at northwestern mutual, our version of financial planning helps you live your dreams today. i was totally stranded. at northwestern mutual, our versino tp?financial so what happened? well... we started buying charmin super mega roll. charmin super mega roll is

but by and soon reminded those watching at home what all this is really about eric maxime she promotes him to the opener. he's not let his coach down during robert leaven dusty's absence that's 4 goals in 5 now for the striker. joy all round on the mind bench my contact between fleet and his sporting director but a slight full ring of relations perhaps. david another but is also leading by him and his 2nd cross of the night set up the 2nd goal yahshua kimmage firing home on 30 minutes. the stretch of the previous few days had evaporated by doing what they do best pulverizing. opposition. and look they're almost best friends again perhaps hansie will be getting a lead to get off the rule. meanwhile palaver set to join real madrid almost ended the hoff on a real high. at the interval later couzin made an attacking double substitution. on some decide at half time we weren't good we were missing a bit of grit and aggression here so we should things not to get back into the games. but it didn't make any difference at all. by munich are just too slick under flick. only the offside flight pre

work there we've turned a cozy into a cell phone company which is not a profit oriented or profit maximizing business and we've protected it from any predatory capitalism so to speak on the scope and protected it for the future just for shits. christiane croll is still the boss at it. but he no longer owns the company assets. with the help of a special foundation model the internet startup has become a so-called purpose driven company and is now steward owned. the company's chief aim is to plant trees a cozy a success has proven its founder right together with his team kroll is celebrating a key milestone in the company's history planting their 100 millionth tree. ok this is. in berlin a cosy employs around 70 well paid staff. instead of working to line their bosses pockets they are gradually making the earth greener. this district in homburg used to be the world's largest trading center for natural commodities such as tea and coffee. today in one of the former warehouses the founder team based around. and kathleen is working on a product need of a rather unusual natural resource that sadly

. >> yes, maximal restraint technique is been referred often to. [inaudible]. and that is a method of an officers arguing with typically a combative or an aggressive person in order to projected them at what the property and it is placing basically attaching a corn of the legs to the waist so that the person the individual does not have free movement of his leg at their legs so securing them again usually by their ankles, and if you're prone to bringing that up to your waist and securing get. in the maximal restraint technique or the humble, if it is used, a supervisor has to responded to the scene and you cannot transport anyone prone in that position due to the risk of the breathing. and so, that is accompanied by mrt, the maximal restraint technique. >> so you talked a little bit in terms of the use force of how officers are reevaluating their use of force from time to time right or should be. >> right. >> so if an officer decided to use that maximum response technique you decide, in the decides not to use it, that is kind of adjusting that use of force. [in

our goal is to maximize resources available to people. and we're working in close collaboration with the imf to support the g20's implementation of the common framework. we're pushing forward together on chad and the wobank hopes to be able to put in fast dispersing resources. chad has collateralized debt owed to a narrow group of creditors presenting specific challenges and finally, we're finalizing a new climate change action plan which includes a big step up in financing, building on our record, climate financing over the past two years. it includes new analytical support to countries as part of integrated climate and development programs. we want to achieve as much impact as possible with the increased financing. our plan identifies key priorities for action with a focus on both adaptation and mitigation. it includes a strong focus on a just transition from coal and we're working to aligning our financial flows with the objectives of the paris agreement. to conclude i've noted big challenges and we're working to bring altogether to ac

could well it is the fascination as of tomorrow as you mention every advantage with the digital maximization vaccinations function here in india a certain tortilla or vaccines are sent by the central government to different states and the rest the states themselves have to pick euro on their real and many of the states suddenly find themselves in a position that they have no vaccines so you have states saying that they have to eat intimidate the expansion of the maximization dry for people over 18 and sound have shut down vaccination for example that's what moved by the city of mumbai which is also a badly hit is saying it's going to stop all vaccination but 3 days to larry but to get more supplies this of course is a huge setback for the indian government because it was hoping its next an issue drive would have great big chain of transmission and bring down numbers and take some of the pressure. off the big beleaguered infrastructure and get set back up on a time when we have to say the government of prime minister narendra modi is severely criticized for mismanaging even denying this crisi

on block 2 east does not maximize the allowed height. the key phase will be from mercy to study the building and designs on 2 east to maximize potential for affordable housing units. for the senior project on 2 west, ccdc will need to study the demands and financial feasibility including hand full of two bedroom units at the development. also of note, the team of two building will be over 11,000 square feet of commercial space with roughly 6000 of that set aside for child care center. here are the key terms of the exclusive negotiations agreement. kim noted, staff is requesting approval to enter one e.n.a. this agreement requires performance deposit 10,000-dollar which will be returned to developer and includes 30-month term extended up to 12 additional months at the discretion of the executive director. e.n.a. anticipates two separate options. a form of that is attached to the e.n.a. also attached is the document approval procedure which lays out the requirements for designs as well as ocii's time frame for reviewing the same. finally,

>> yes. >> the maximal restraint technique also requires supervisory reporting, is that right?> it does. >> if you could highlight section four -- three? you can see here by policy a supervisor, shelby called to the scene where the subject is restrained using mrt or hovel. >> yes. >> the supervisor, you'd have to go evaluate whether it was properly and necessarily used, is that right? >> yes. >> if you could highlight section b on the same page. >> after it used on an individual, and typically when it's used, it means the person is in the prone position, is that right? >> yes. >> at least initially to get on, can you explain what prone position is? >> flat on your stomach on the ground. >> once a hovel is used, to restrain the hands and feet in the prone position, what is the policy. >> with them in recovery position. >> what is the side recovery position? >> roll them on their side to ease their breathing. >> do you know why that is important? >> it helps them breathe better rather than having them on their chest, it gets them to their side to breathe easier. >> are you famili

>> if the officers uses the maximal restraint technique and e.m.s.as to come, the officers have to remove that potentially, right? >> correct. >> and that can delay medical treatment? >> sure. >> now, again,in your 27 years as a police officer, have you had to deal with cloud of people that form and watch your activities? >> yes. >> if your experience as a police officer, especially in the more recent era, have you been in a situation whereby standers begin to film you in your activities? >> yes. does that happen more and more these days than it did five years ago? >> yes. >> and have you been in a situation in your career as a law enforcement officer where the crowd starts to yell at you? >> yes. >> or becomes a little more volatile? >> yes. >> as an officer, does that cause you concern? >> yes. >> generally speaking, as, again, an officer with 27 years of experience, if you're dealing with one potential suspect and then a new perceived threat emerges, but you know that person needs medical attention, do you deal with the medical attention and ignor

. >> in terms of the maximal restraint technique. you were describing that technique. >> yes, sir. >> again, officers are trained to sometimes escalate the use of force in certain circumstances, correct? >> yes. >> and deescalate the use of force in certain circumstances. >> yes, sir. >> if an officer decides initially to use the maximal restraint technique and subsequently decides against it because of a medical situation or lack of resistance, would that be a deescalation of the use of force? >> yes. >> is it more or less difficult to render medical aid if someone is in the maximal restraint technique? >> i would say it was probably a little more difficult to maneuver around that. >> they would not be able to put them on their back, for example. >> it would be difficult, sir, yes. >> in terms of the use of force part of the ground defense program is actually to use body weight as a form of deescalation, is it not? >> yeah, it's use of force that may be used instead of higher escalations of force, yes. >> but sometimes holding someo

. >> would you agree that a hobble is just sort of a brand name for a maximal restraint technique? >> yes, there are specific brands like the rip hobble, but, yes, these are all the same concept essentially. >> is the application of force by the officers without the hobble essentially maximal restraint technique, but without the use of that tool? >> what you see here is officers controlling mr. floyd's upper body, middle body, and lower body, which would keep him from kicking. so although not a perfect parallel, i would describe it as a behavioral analog of a hobble-like technique. >> and when an individual is placed in the maximal restraint, are they supposed to be placed in the side recovery position? >> absolutely. as soon as the individual is restrained, get the person off of their stomach and into a side recovery position. >> i'd like to then move to the next segment. >> if i may, on -- >> we can move to the next segment. we're looking at the next clip, which is exhibit 47. beginning at 20:23.47. if you would publish that, please. >> roll him on his side? >> no. >> all right.

testimony to essentially be that that's what these officers were doing was essentially using the maximal restraint technique but not using a hobble. and pursuant to departmental policy the hubble is the only authorized use of the only authorized way to employ the maximal restraint technique is that right are you aware that the formal use the use the actual hobble requires a supervisor to report to force report. to report. but that would be avoided if the hubble itself wasn't used or. in the. technique again with the individual. and you're basically doing that maneuver and because of the severity of risk to. a bent mr floyd you would have contacted the supervisor in aside from that i mean if the you're using m r t you are supposed to adhere to departmental policy is that right. and the miss departmental policy for the use the m r t requires an aa. officer to do what as soon as the m r t is applied. again because of these nature making sure that individual can breathe we have to get that individual to a side recovery position to make sure that they're not obstructed. paramount so that's re

when when the maximal restraint technique is applied. they are the suspect is essentially handcuffed behind their back and through a series of belts their legs are bent a kind of an upward angle and then connected to some sort of device right around the waist i don't like to bend back towards a bend where the only to keep a straight right but there's a tie between the ankles and the waist central cracked and if you mess is there way the restraint you've got to take that off and kinda lay medical care agreed. usually taking your review if if an officer uses the maximal restraint technique and e.m.'s has to come the officers have to remove that potential correct and back in the way medical treatment sure. now again in your 27 years as a police officer have you had to deal with. crowds of people that form and watch your activity yes in your experience as a police officer especially in the more recent era have you been in a situation where bystanders begin to film you and your activities yes does that happen more and more these days than it

. >> yes, maximal restraint technique is been referred often to. [inaudible]. and that is a method of an officers arguing with typically a combative or an aggressive person in order to projected them at what the property and it is placing basically attaching a corn of the legs to the waist so that the person the individual does not have free movement of his leg at their legs so securing them again usually by their ankles, and if you're prone to bringing that up to your waist and securing get. in the maximal restraint technique or the humble, if it is used, a supervisor has to responded to the scene and you cannot transport anyone prone in that position due to the risk of the breathing. and so, that is accompanied by mrt, the maximal restraint technique. >> so you talked a little bit in terms of the use force of how officers are reevaluating their use of force from time to time right or should be. >> right. >> so if an officer decided to use that maximum response technique you decide, in the decides not to use it, that is kind of adjusting that use of force. [in

they want to maximize taxes an want to maximize regulations and i think it will be a big problem.he end of the year they start raising taxes on everybody, including you. you're probably an llc, charles. you will get your tax rate raised. i'm guessing on that. if they do that everybody will produce less and work less, trust me on this. charles: you're right. listen, they're going to take this boom which is an extension of things that were done that you helped to orchestrate, use it as an excuse for higher taxes. i'm afraid what is going to happen. larry, thank you so much. folks you have to watch this every single day. "kudlow" 4:00 p.m. eastern sometime. >> bless you charles. charles: right now the s&p 500 and dow on record paces for closing at all-time highs when it comes to make money it is never too late. we have final trades you must consider. we'll be right back incomparable design makes it beautiful. state of the art technology, makes it brilliant. the visionary lexus nx. lease the 2021 nx 300 for $349 a month for 36 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. everyone

maximize profit when we have to let me see the personnel of this can bummer to have children as well they look into their turns i didn't say i'm destroying the planet so you won't be able to live in it. when you're a. i asked an alaskan bushman one time i said look for no other reason protect the fish retrieve your children so they'll be involved in it and he looked at me and said you know what in 5 years my mortgage is paid not that i couldn't give it why do people like that have children now switching to i guess but if we really loved our children we would be very concerned about the future and you know we chased the patagonia to push portugal under 110 days from the coast of antarctica to ecuador a west africa the longest pursuit of a poacher in maritime history and that bessel that one vessel had taken 60000000 dollars worth of tools bush off the tory coast the net that we pulled up from and complicated was 72 kilometers long and late 70 tons of cold into kilometers from it took us 110 hours to pull that net. and that's just one ship and there's there's $4000000.00 fishing vessel

again made things easier than they should be palming the bulls straight into the path of striker eric maxime to promoting as brian were once more for the time and space while attacking down them left flank. borg hit back through leading scorer of very cost who was set up by the ever lively zaba shrug of his 19th of the season but just 2 minutes later jamal moose eola sealed his brace to put by in 31 their head. paul thomas miller it was a 17th assist of the season but it was not a routine victory in the 2nd half by and took left foot off the gas and the hosts revved up shortening the lead through muxing 1000000 philip far too easily for manuel neuer slugging. the wolves have the better chances but couldn't make up for their keepers 1st off mistakes. are now 7 points clear at the top of the table as humphrey flick kicks off what looks like his farewell tour by ending both schools unbeaten home record. well elsewhere mission gladbach hosted from 1st before the match the visitors coach. announced that he would replace departing gladbach coach michael at the end of the season. took the news well

which is something i yanged what he means to me maximize profits.undo, let me clarify for our viewers the home you are being kicked out of is actually owned by this group, the friends of youth, it's technically a facility just now they are re-purposing it, if you will, for the migrant surge, the friends of youth put out a statement on tuesday that says this: the family voluntarily entered into an occupancy agreement that provided them a home with free rent and paid for utilities while the agreement stipulate 30 days notice, the family was originally given 45 days notice, which was extended to 60 days. upon being offered further extension, the family declined. the agreement in place with this family is not a traditional rent/lease agreement and therefore does not fall under the eviction moratorium. so that's what they say. that's their position towards you. but, how is this impacting you? how do you feel about this? >> i don't know what to think about it really. we have four children and two of them are youth at risk need to be watched 24/7. they kic

the force would be controlled, so as to maximize benefits, to increase the yield.ere dreams european forester handed over to america ends -- americans like gifford pinchot. >> he was a strong advocate of scientific forestry but thought it should be applied fairly here in the united states. narrator: gifford pinchot believed american 4th street should reflect the democratic values of the nation. the land to be managed for all. there is no plan for managing the last landholdings. the policy was to dispose of them. >> the general land office in the united states apartment of the interior, is just giving it -- united states department of the interior, is giving it away as fast as possible. narrator: land grants to railroads open the west to develop meant. uncontrolled mining and logging reshaped the western landscape. corrupt syndicates found ways to sidestep the law, to bring public domain lands under their control. ♪ >> you want to land, and there are rules attached to it. but getting around to rules is the fun of it all. fraud is the american way. you have to be abo

. >> so what you need to do to maximize your chances of what you need to do to secure afghanistan and stabilizing there is no deadline how do you manage the risk and manage prospects for success we amass and maximizes the prospect to say we want to negotiate peaceful and withdrawal forces. the president decided otherwise. now we need to course correct and that is where the concept of the transatlantic partnership of americans and europeans and afghans is crucial. that the end is a political question not a military question. >> i will turn to questions from the audience. if afghanistan returns to civil war how serious is the threat to the eu? posed by the irregular migration and international terrorism and drug trafficking? maybe you can take that question and i will turn on the same question. if afghanistan doesn't go in the direction we all want, could that be a base for international terrorism the drug trafficking or immigration issues? >> no question. that is a possibility. maybe even a significant possibility. those of us working at this issue the past couple of years, think the p

this time they held firm propelling bines onslaught as the champions be on attack after attack eric maxime was the month foiled this time. he did grab his usual goal 4 minutes into injury time as he posts on alexander hops nearer to make it 36 league goals for the season an inch closer to get miller's record but it came too late for biron to turn things around and. they must wait a little bit longer to celebrate a 9th street title but the day belonged to meit's they celebrated as if they'd already avoided the drop coachable stenson will be delighted to have dealt their relegation rivals a huge psychological blow. man on dortmund be involved to nail on saturday. their champions league hopes alive and they have a pair of goals from an a hole and to thank for it a major blunder by rattle back who fed the ball straight to all and they needed no 2nd invitation to open the scoring it was the young no we didn't 24th goal of the same reason and with dortmund a man down in the 2nd half paul and netted the 25th the 2nd most in the leg there was no stopping him as he barreled forward with only 3 k. f

again made things easier than they should be palming the bulls straight into the path of striker eric maxime to promoting as brian will once more for the time and space while attacking down the left flank. both borg hit back through leading scorer val very cost who was set up by the ever lively zaba shrug of his 19th of the season but just 2 minutes later jamal most eola sealed his brace to put by and 3 want to head. for thomas millar it was a 17th assist of the season but it was not a routine victory. in the 2nd half by and took the foot off the gas on the hosts revved up shortening the lead through philip easily full manual noise like. the wolves have the better chances but couldn't make up their keepers 1st off mistakes. on now 7 points clear at the top of the table flick kicks off what looks like his farewell tool by entering full spokes unbeaten home record. elsewhere posted frank for before the match the visitors coach at the had to announce that he would replace departing coach departing glad back. at the end of the season clawed back took the news well scoring an early corner to a 4

the votes book keeper wasn't having a good day it was soon to mill through eric maxime cheaper. the replay doesn't make it any better for castles it was standin striker to promoting 3rd goal in 4 games who needs the injured robert levin dusky. buy ins players seem to love fighting full flick his decision was clearly painful. you know for sure me as a chance to coach this team and to be so successful was very special and still is. i thank everyone in the club for the boss's call heinze for him and really habit hina everyone that was there and backed me to be the coach of byron munich. shift and i'm a by mention on condon he thanked everyone except sally how much it should but by and as a whole we're not amused by flicks timing they did not expect him to make the announcement and it seems he told the players before the game. could the wolves profit from the strange circumstances of a cost pulled one back. to last the ball in midfield and vote pounced they are not certain the table for nothing. flick might be seeing again soon for germany away from all those boardroom battles. neve