somewhat different than they're often considered to be i want to shift next and and talk about john maynard keynes and keynes was truly a great individual in terms of his personality was a great deal of the source of his success and hayek and canes were contemporaries. they both lived in england from 1931 when hayek moved to the london school of economics from vienna until keynes's death in 1946 cain's taught at cambridge, which is only 60 miles from london and the economists from london and at the london school of economics where hayek taught and it cambridge where king was they would regularly see each other's and conferences and seminars. they read the same economics journals and participated in the same activities and then during world war two as a result of the bombing of london the school of economics was moved to cambridge for the war years. so hayek relocated to to cambridge in 1940 and he then lived in cambridge near canes during world war two and came to know him quite well, so although they disagreed in economics. they were they were friends and hike provided a great description of keyn

maynard keynes, maynard keynes, right? that's his of the main objection. i mean, i'm not sure that anyone even in the elite no matter how we define them would remember exactly made keynes was except we are called keynesians now, may have something with collectivism. we agree on way too much of them, but the point is we've always thought that our classrooms, people were either conservative or to liberal in our classrooms, and then try to make a cause out of that. like saddam hussein still fighting his little like sharks and just about with someone from tikrit. i know i'm doing it. i know i'm constantly thinking that people i dislike must be to the right of me and must be obnoxious in that the world, and supporters to design my ideology so it has certain people in its sights, and certain sentimental people, sentimental vision of people that i don't know, thomas, if you imagine relatives of yours who suffered under segregation the way that i imagine my appellation relatives, but i definitely will take some time to tell you that it's west virginia have been lef

and we're going to continue our discussion today by reviewing the works of friedrich hayek john maynard keynes and milton friedman whom i consider to be the three most influential economists of the 20th century and of the three, i really consider hayek to be the most influential. he addressed what i call the knle

maynard keynes, is that is the other objection. i'm not sure anyone even in the elite remembers who this is except we are always being told we are keynesians now. the point is we always thought people were either too conservative or liberal. likeke saddam hussein, still fighting his battle. i know i'm constantly thinking people must be to the right of me and not just end of the world and it's important to decide my ideologies and certain sentimental people into visions of the people that i don't know if you imagine the relatives of yours that suffered the way that i imagine my relatives but i definitely will take some time toto tell you they were left out of everything and i have some sentimental attachment to that. maybe we can talk about what the definition is. it's laughable how of the four of us see the criteria and in our education and i think we are turning on and passing them off as political arguments. i completely agree they turn into little skirmishes. >> the rosebud idea, moments in our childhood absolutely still definin