now, professor mcclaren didn't work alone. he assembled a team. a team of experienced investigators, hard scrabble people that were skeptical of the doctor's claims, and because he knew that he couldn't just rely on the doctor's word, he hired people to review all the evidence and also to look at stored sames of russian athletes -- the b bottles that had been taken from the sochi lab and moved to a another lab, and what did professor mcclaren and his team of investigators find? they found that doctor was completely credible and, moreover, that his evidence was fully corroborated by the documents which they determined to be authentic, and by a rigorous and expansive testing protocol for the samples, which showed clear evidence of tampering both of the bottles themselves because of scratches and marks, and because adjustments made to the urine to make the salt levels macthe salt level that the athlete gave at the time of the in-competition testing. tell tale signs that the doctor was telling the truth. most importantly, the doctor produced the actua

always said that the truth and justice always prevail in the end when the world believes one man mcclaren who comes up with more in more allegations is just nonsense. we've also discussed the issue with a number of experts including sports lawyer parts of he welcomed the ruling. by the it's a victory for common sense and the fundamental principles of the olympics over political wins we've always stuck to the principles journey i.o.c. inquiry and recast as well charter is based on them that's what pedicle bitin left us when he created the olympic movement whole report this whole situation was based on a criminal informant which is a doctor or a chunk of so he get the information. you know when he escaped from russia and sort of was helping an american film make a point for go to dope to win and i'm sure race part of this whole crux of the car was what was was how these bottles were being tampered with these two men who were involved in exposing all of this mess basically day and gave cus enough evidence to say listen mcclaren water i.o.c. we don't believe you go. the i.o.c. will oversee do

. >> sam mcclaren has known goodwin since he arrived at the jail and now wants to speak to him about his alleged role in the fight. >> have a seat in that yellow chair, mr. goodwin. tony, we're here to talk about the incident that took place on jail 19b, altercation involved two individuals. tony, it's stated that you were there. >> i wasn't there. >> you wasn't there? why did they say you were there? >> i have no idea. >> they come out of the room both yelling and hollering at each other. they say it was in cell 4. which cell were you in? >> i was in four. >> thank you. came out, grabbed his shirt, i feel a certain kind of way. you stepped into cell, cell 15. from there, got him in a head lock. tony, you did not hit him, you did not get a chance to fight him. >> i didn't touch him. >> but you were there. come on, tony. >> guilty by association? >> no, sir, guilty because you stepped in the cell. >> i didn't step in the cell. >> this individual states that you did. give me your version of what happened. make it short, though. give me your version. >> i can't really tell you. i ain't

they were there not here in geneva in geneva yes was there some kind of video conference with mr mcclaren and mr raja exactly yes you don't have the right to disclose any of these no no and i was even myself not present throughout the hearing in the in the room but in the case of young chang trial did it come to the point when the i.o.c. had to provide something to the court not the geneva case but here for this case here in the panel only review the question of the application of the law of the rules of the i.o.c. it's reviewed only the process whether it was fair whether it was nondiscriminatory discriminatory. it found that it was not critical there was no. the rules were not unfair and they have complied with by the i. so it was only a legally stick approach again there was no review of every. for the entire case of the sochi case was not discussed here the report was last discussed here it's only the review of the i.o.c. process which was discussed here i just wanted to ask you about the mechanics of the arbitration who comes in first who delivers the messages first who is represente

who were involved in exposing all of this mess basically gave cus enough evidence to say listen mcclaren what i.o.c. we don't believe you guys the i.o.c. will oversee do everything in his power doesn't want to compete but i don't think they can do it and the reason. the reason is basically. in the decision was that the level ineligible which claim cation research once you will be eligible for climate change and the i.o.c. then sanction them again by excluding them. with doping even though it's been proved that not. you know that really. doesn't want you and punishing an athlete is something they haven't done in the first. two another headline stories this hour the release of a classified kung gresham memel now allegedly detailing abuses of surveillance powers by the f.b.i. is expected to be approved by president trump in the coming hours the possible move has already led to a major backlash from both the agency and the democratic party with more and not kill about been. well a specter of anticipation is hanging over washington d.c. as everyone is anticipating the release of the memo now

men who were involved in exposing all of this mess basically gave us enough evidence to say listen mcclaren water you see we don't believe you guys the tribunal's conclusion has poked a sizable hole in the reasoning behind the i.o.c. his decision to bar russia from the olympics but the not guilty verdict does not guarantee a ticket to south korea later this month it's still the hour you'll see that gets the last say in who does go and who does not since the russian olympic committee is suspended russian athletes can participate in pyongyang only on invitation by the i.o.c. . the result of the cast decision does not mean that athletes from the group of twenty eight will be invited to the games so for now even without an invitation to south korea the twenty eight russian athletes have potentially paved the way for other clean athletes to achieve justice but even with this battle won the war is far from over we discuss the issue with a number of lawyers who have been following and indeed involved in the case they told us they welcome the decision. but this is a victory for common sense and the

men who were involved in exposing all of this mess basically gave us enough evidence to say listen mcclaren water you see we don't believe you guys the tribunals conclusion has poked a sizable hole in the reasoning behind the i.o.c. his decision to bar russia from the olympics but the not guilty verdict does not guarantee a ticket to south korea later this month it's still the hour you'll see that gets the last say in who does go and who does not since the russian olympic committee is suspended russian athletes can participate in pyongyang only on invitation by the i.o.c. the result of the cash decision does not mean that athletes from the group of twenty eight will be invited to the games so for now even without an invitation to south korea the twenty eight russian athletes have potentially paved the way for other clean athletes to achieve justice but even with this battle won the war is far from over. well we discussed the issue with a number of experts including were known sports lawyer our chimp part so he's got a lot of experience in this particular matter he welcomed the ruling. but i

they were there not here in geneva in geneva yes was there some kind of video conference with mr mcclaren and mr raja exactly yes you don't have the right to disclose any of these no no and i was even myself not present throughout the hearing in the in the room but in the case of young chang trial did it come to the point when the i.o.c. had to provide something to the court not the geneva case but here for this case here in the panel only review the question of the application of the law of the rules of the i.o.c. it's reviewed only the process whether it was fair whether it was nondiscriminatory discriminatory. it found that it was not critical there was no. the rules were not unfair and they have complied with by the you see so it was only a legally stick approach again there was no review of every. for the entire case of the sochi case was not discussed here the report was last discussed here it's only the review of the i.o.c. process which was discussed here i just wanted to. ask you about the mechanics of the arbitration who comes in first who delivers the messages first who is repr

have a great time and what a lovely people have a good good memories as well as election day bill mcclaren displayed one of the authorities as like a mad general he also said leaping like a some in israel and that's what you called to read about i think he said once or twice i was always and nothing else. and i occasionally he maybe mentioned i was useful as a lighthouse in a desert which has been also compliments of it a series sadly mysie played a big part it's reality and i make in the game of rugby exciting and i love watching this and my view is one of the the atmosphere stadiums of the world in the last stadiums look plenty that have no atmosphere this is pretty and say it and it has great atmosphere when we play in the big games they see scott winning when young and a big of a map on the field we'll be as close to each other in the way now it's we couldn't hear the way no calls because the noise was just so great on the field because of the bones of the roof on to the pitch and with that so my fear is why it was a success. no and it was this took it to the big board. and with is dif

who were involved in exposing all of this mess basically gave cus enough evidence to say listen mcclaren what i.o.c. we don't believe you guys the i.o.c. will oversee do everything in his power to stop it doesn't want to compete but i don't think they can do it and the reason. the reason is basically. in the decision was that the level ineligible cation research once you know it will be eligible for climate change and the i.o.c. then sanction them again why excluding them. with doping even though it's been proved like not types you know that really. doesn't want you and you're punishing an athlete with something they haven't done in the first. a libyan man who lost his whole family in a nato air raid is planning to take his fight for justice to the european court of human rights he says the airline stopped two bombs on his house during its military intervention in the country in two thousand and eleven. now we demand that nato explain why our house and other houses were showing all the military targets i don't understand why nato targeted our house sadly my dear wife died as well as my c

have a great time and what a lovely people have a good good memories as well as election day bill mcclaren displayed one of the authorities as like a mad general he also said leaping like a some in israel that's what you called to read i think he said once or twice i was always and nothing else. and i occasionally he maybe mentioned i was useful as a lighthouse in a desert which has been also a compliment a bit sadly missy played a big part as well and an american game of rugby exciting and i was watching this and my view is one of the the atmosphere stadiums of the world in the last stadium plenty of new atmosphere this is pretty n.s.a. and it has great atmosphere when we play in the big games like cisco in england you know and a big of a map on the field we'll be as close to each other in the way not we couldn't hear the way no calls because the noise was just to clear the field because of the bones of the roof on to the pitch and with that so my fear is that why you are so sick say. no and it was this took it to the big board. and with is difficult to explain to people but that is what

have a great time and what a lovely people have a good good memories as well as election day bill mcclaren disclaimed one of the authorities as like a mad general he also said leaping like a salmon its allies that's what you called to read about i think he said once or twice i was always and nothing else. and i occasionally he may be mentioned there which is useful as a lighthouse in a desert which has been also complemented it is sadly messy play the big pot it's reality and the make and the game of rugby exciting and i was watching this and my view is one of the the atmosphere stadiums of the world in the last stadiums look plenty but they have no atmosphere this is pretty n.s.a. and it has great atmosphere when we play in the big games like cisco in england young and a big of a map on the field we'll be as close to each other in the way now it's we couldn't hear the way no calls because the noise was just so great the field because of the bones of the roof on to the pitch and with that so my fear is why it was a success. no and it was this took it to the big board. and with is difficult

men who were involved in exposing all of this mess basically gave us enough evidence to say listen mcclaren water you'll see we don't believe you guys the tribunal's conclusion has poked a sizable hole in the reasoning behind the i.o.c. his decision to bar russia from the olympics but the not guilty verdict does not guarantee a ticket to south korea later this month it's still the see that gets the last say in who does go and who does not since the russian olympic committee is suspended russian athletes can participate in pyongyang only on invitation by the i.o.c. the result of the cash decision does not mean that athletes from the group of twenty eight will be invited to the games so for now even without an invitation to south korea the twenty eight russian athletes have potentially paved the way for other clean athletes to achieve justice but even with this battle won the war is far from over. we discussed the issue with a number of lawyers following the case they told us they welcomed the decision. by the it's a victory for common sense and the fundamental principles of the olympics over

mcclaren started making sort of a sports series, for a broader audience. is going to make an s.u.v.n the female audience. that's what women want. you see these companies that would never even consider making an s.u.v. ferrari is going to make sort call it a're going to ferrari utility vehicle, because they don't want to say s.u.v. because women are this missing segment for them, tiers of thewer market -- >> they make billions! audi, mercedes, b.m.w. you can get the marketing pretty wrong. audi had a very embarrassing mishap in china. >> yes. have gotten a lot better over the past few decades, but they're not perfect. ad last year in china where there was a bride and groom, at the altar, and the mother-in-law, the future mother-in-law, came up, started pinching and poking at the bride like you would test a horse or a car. and audi had to pooj -- down.ize and take the ad we were like, whoa, i can't believe -- >> yes. red balloon.like a >> "bloomberg businessweek" is available on newsstands now. online at businessweek.com and on our app.e >> here's our favorite story. >> he takes us to

i'm nance my mcclaren, ceo of organization of internext investment. i have a pleasure of representing over 200 companies. these are all foreign firms that have made a deliberate decision to invest in the united states and employ americans here. across the country, almost 7 million americans get a paycheck from foreign-owned companies. companies like japan-based toyota, german-based siemens, switzerland-based nestle, and canada-based burger king. these companies probably have a lot to do with your day-to-day existence from the trains you take to work in the morning or cars that you drive, the buses your kids get on in the morning and even your after dinner drinks as well. there is foreign investment in some parts of the u.s. economy and supports a lot of the u.s. workforce and i think that we're almost to the point where it is really, really difficult to tell whether a company is a u.s. firm or a foreign firm. thank you to the mccourt school. honor to be here today with ambassador sullivan, and to be able to have a conversation about trade policy. you