we have parks in the cities that are roads that go through them, for example, golden gate park, mcclaren park and others that are definitely not recreational. they may provide access to recreation, but golden gate park there are roads that are simply to get you from the north side of the park to the south side of the park. we recently built bike lanes in golden gate park. although biking in one form could be recreational. a lot of people are biking to commute these days. we might want to put a cab stand at the edge of the park, and maybe put a bus stop at the each other of edge of the mark

we have parks in the cities that are roads that go through them, for example, golden gate park, mcclaren park and others that are definitely not recreational. they may provide access to recreation, but golden gate park there are roads that are simply to get you from the north side of the park to the south side of the park. we recently built bike lanes in golden gate park. although biking in one form could be recreational. a lot of people are biking to commute these days. we might want to put a cab stand at the edge of the park, and maybe put a bus stop at the each other of edge of the mark park. we have food concessions in these parks and, in fact, there is a new food concession that is being built. do those require a vote of the people and if not, how is it different than this, particularly that this station will provide direct access to a park for people who are coming off of muni? >> i haven't analyzed all of those other factual situations that you have raised and i analyzed this one as it relates to this particular project. so i'm not going to try in next 3 minutes to analyze all of the d

the community had a lot of concerns and three other roadways in mcclaren park. we are currently working with sfmta and dpw on project funding and project implementation. as a team we are intending to go back with the proposalal. in closing i would like to thank the agency staff, sfmta and dpw for much needed support during the process and thank you for your time and consideration of this very important project. >> thank you. thanks for your comments. next speaker please. >> good morning, elizabeth stamp, executive director. we are excited this is moving forward. we were a big advocate for the proposition into include funding for pedestrian improvements and transit improvements. we advocated for its passage as well and it's been a long wait so we are excited to see it moving forward to fund projects. one concern is nexus with pedestrian safety is not totally clear on all of the projects being put forward. as folks mentioned it is a small pay as you go source. having that go toward allowing countdown signals along high-injury corridors throughout the city makes a