again, the guy she was working for, mccray dowless, he was there at the hearing today but declined to granted him immunity. the board did not grant him immunity and that was pretty much the end of day one. the hearing will continue, but this is an election won by 905 votes. i mean it is tempting just to make this about the math, right? whether the result was based on wrongfully cast ballots or rightfully cast ballots that were trashed intentionally for the benefit of one candidate. but what this north carolina board is being asked to decide is whether the election itself was tainted by what state investigators, again, are calling a coordinated, unlawful and substantially resourced scheme. when the hearings conclude, the appointed state board will take a vote either to certify the results from november, which would hand the republican the seat, or they could order a do-over, a fresh election. have voters pick a new winner in a new election. taking any action will require at least one republican or two democrats to break party lines. if they can't do that, they can't come to one of thos