constraints against doing so. >> how about with mckey? if there is a case where there is an amicus in a case before you, would you meet with them privately when the case is pending? privately,tt: meet allow the amicus? no. that would be inappropriate. >> is it possible that you would not know who is behind the amicus if they have not told you? how they are: funded? i am thinking through what the disclosures are. that is not part of what groups disclose when they file emma chris reese. >> -- when they file amicus briefs. >> there is a decision that amicus in their disclosure only who paid for the physical preparation and filing of the brief. interest of aig group that said here's a million dollars we want you to do great things and we would appreciate it if you filed an amicus brief in this matter but don't mention us and we would love to give you would sayut what you and we would love to read it before you file it. that doesn't meet the standard of 37.6. the court and the parties would never know and in fact, this happened in the oracle c

. >> is it mckey or mackey? it's mackey. >> that's the way it looks. >> you've got my name wrong. >> what? >> who are you calling mckey? >> it's my day. >> i love going to the zoo! i love going to the zoo! it's always cool in san francisco when you go. you have to wear a sweatshirt, right by the beach. >> always. we were pulling all kinds of clothes out of the diaper bag trying to figure out how to stay comfortable out there at the zoo the last time we went. it's going to be cool there and also a cool start in the east bay as you get ready to head out the door. we have the mid-40s for to you start but it's going to be a really nice day as we start to warm up closer to lunch time. we'll talk about that and more coming up around the bay area. how is it looking getting out the door for us, mike? >>> kari, we're going to give you some live looks since we have a network of cameras. let's go ahead and use them. things are moving pretty well. we do have a look at observing where northbound those taillights look like th

constraints against doing so. >> how about with mckey? if there is a case where there is an amicus in a case before you, would you meet with them privately when the case is pending? privately,tt: meet allow the amicus? no. that would be inappropriate. >> is it possible that you would not know who is behind the amicus if they have not told you? how they are: funded? i am thinking through what the disclosures are. that is not part of what groups disclose when they file emma chris reese. >> -- when they file amicus briefs. >> there is a decision that amicus in their disclosure only who paid for the physical preparation and filing of the brief. interest of aig group that said here's a million dollars we want you to do great things and we would appreciate it if you filed an amicus brief in this matter but don't mention us and we would love to give you would sayut what you and we would love to read it before you file it. that doesn't meet the standard of 37.6. the court and the parties would never know and in fact, this happened in the oracle c

that crash cleared at mckey. a spot of slowing up to santa clara.e-checking to make sure nothing big is going on. 680 where is says fremont at vargas. back to you. >> thanks, mike. >>> happening now a stanford alum and two russian cosmonauts are now at their new home aboard the international space stakes station. the docki ining happened after launched late last night. nasa astronauts and stanford alum kate rubin will do research in earth, science, biology and dna sequencing. >>> coming up next a quick look at our top stories for this wednesday morning including two bay area counties easing restrictions for businesses today. details on some facebook ads. the reason the tech giant is beening ads discouraging people from getting vaccinated. you're watching "today in the bay." the unfair money bail system. he, accused of rape. while he, accused of stealing $5. the stanford rapist could afford bail; the senior citizen could not; forced to wait in jail nearly a year. voting yes on prop 25 ends this failed system, replacing it with one based on public saf

we typically see that build at 680 and it builds up to mckey. it was a little more severe to alum rock. no incidents reported. i saw traffic moving. speeds are recovering the last couple of minutes. we'll track the south bay. no big deal right now. the peninsula and east bay a nice, easy drive. in the east bay we still have slowing north 880. the speed sensors clear so i think the construction has cleared and the bay bridge continues to be clear as well as the north bay closure. highway 101 reopen through petaluma after that crash. back to you. >>> thank you very much, mike. we continue with our breaking news this morning. president trump and the first lady testing positive for covid-19. >> tracie potts is live from washington. the vice president test results came within the last hour. he is negative. now tracing back to the virus is really going to be key

constraints against doing so. >> how about with mckey?there is a case where there is an amicus in a case before you, would you meet with them privately when the case is pending? privately,tt: meet allow the amicus? no. that would be inappropriate. >> is it possible that you would not know who is behind the amicus if they have not told you? how they are: funded? i am thinking through what the disclosures are. that is not part of what groups disclose when they file emma chris reese. >> -- when they file amicus briefs. >> there is a decision that amicus in their disclosure only who paid for the physical preparation and filing of the brief. interest of aig group that said here's a million dollars we want you to do great things and we would appreciate it if you filed an amicus brief in this matter but don't mention us and we would love to give you would sayut what you and we would love to read it before you file it. that doesn't meet the standard of 37.6. the court and the parties would never know and in fact, this happened in the oracle case