mdm. clerk, do you have any announcements? >> guested please make sure all cell phones and electronic devices are off. items acted upon today will here on the july 28 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> okay. mdm. clerk, can we talk please call item to out of order >> item number two is a resolution approving the agreement with nonprofit owners association for ministration management established property-based community benefit district known as the lower community district. >> so, i believe the representative from the mayor's office of economic reports the moment is here to present. good morning. >> good morning chairman yee christiansen. senior project manager from the office of economic and workforce development i oversee the cities committee benefit district program. i just like to thank supervisor christiansen for sponsoring the resolution will authorize the management contract for the established excuse me, lower community benefit disappeared as you all know, on j

so, i would ask you, mdm. pres., the legal moment of silence for catherine stegall and her family. >>[moment of silence] >> thank you. thank you, commissioner adams. i would like to make sure that we adjourn this meeting in the memory of catherine stegall. as commissioner adams said, just a young woman, just an extraordinary young woman. i'm deeply sorry and send our condolences to her family. commissioners. that's it. that would commissioners report executive director moyer spoke about the success of the event with the san francisco symphony on sunday, but i just want to echo my thanks to all our staff did i know they stepped in and really helped make that a tremendous success and looking around at the crowds that turned out, it was really such a joyous occasion. i actually thought the quiet crowd was quite young which was nice. is this and he mentioned that as well but they were pleased that was a much younger crowd from where i was sitting, i think the average age romney was probably late 20s, which was wonderful to see data. sure it had nothing to do with the nationals. then pe

mdm. clerk, do you have any announcements? >> guested please make sure all cell phones and electronic devices are off. items acted upon today will here on the july 28 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> okay. mdm. clerk, can we talk please call item to out of order >> item number two is a resolution approving the agreement with nonprofit owners association for ministration management established property-based community benefit district known as the lower community district. >> so, i believe the representative from the mayor's office of economic reports the moment is here to present. good morning. >> good morning chairman yee christiansen. senior project manager from the office of economic and workforce development i oversee the cities committee benefit district program. i just like to thank supervisor christiansen for sponsoring the resolution will authorize the management contract for the established excuse me, lower community benefit disappeared as you all know, on j

mdm. pres. i sat in the majority leader office and urged the majority leader on senator rubio's amendment. i indicated that should be set as a conditions before lifting sanctions. i argued with majority leader that if the democrats were so opposed to voting on that amendment, that that was all the more reason and the majority leader said no, he would not do so. that invoking cloture on an amendment was an extraordinary step and he wouldn't do so, so he cut off every amendment. the democratic leader senator harry reid, calling out the majority leader for engaging in the same procedural abuse that harry did over and over again in this body, now the republican leader is behaving like the senior senator from nevada. what we just saw was not what they told you and me and every other republican senator. what the majority leader just did is number one, he called off that amendment. he called it up himself. why does that matter? he has priority of recognition. when he calls up and amendment no one can s

. >> good afternoon mdm. commissioner and commissioners. in the past we have worked together for improvement in the water system program this is to discuss the hydrologic model that they have that we would like to use to deal the watershed. >> all those in favor? >>aye >> motion carried. >> next item please >> item 12 workshop number two. >> let's revisit item 10. >> good afternoon commissioners. this is item number tend to approve the consent to assignment agreement for planning and engineering services for the central bayside system improvement project. in this instance, as a role of the improvement commissions member you are asking to be a role in the design and planning projects that we are asking to assignment the project to the joint venturer project with the americans >> i hope that you felt that it was appropriate the last time we spoke because only because i had not had all the details. the last time we spoke you gave me a blow-by-blow of the details and i want to thank you kathy for the work that you do. i was just uncomfortable w

. >> mdm. chair some people propose we don't have any threshold but the regulator has the power to do their job. you've seen some of that i'm sure. thank you very much mr. chairman and i want to follow-up on exactly the same question that senator warren just just finished on. last september i asked the federal reserve to rule about raising the trigger when a bank is systemically important from the $50 billion level. in hearings we heard that the asset threshold should be raised or change because it's arbitrary, includes institutions that are not systemically important focuses only on size and produces undesirable incentives. they said several years of testing and assessment have given regulators a better understanding of the threshold and given the intensity and complexity of around stress testing, regulators haven't felt the additional regulations don't warrant the expenditures associated with those large institutions. i guess my question to you is another way of asking the same question that

. >> mdm. chair some people propose we don't have any threshold but the regulator has the power to do their job. you've seen some of that i'm sure. thank you very much mr. chairman and i want to follow-up on exactly the same question that senator warren just just finished on. last september i asked the federal reserve to rule about raising the trigger when a bank is systemically important from the $50 billion level. in hearings we heard that the asset threshold should be raised or change because it's arbitrary, includes institutions that are not systemically important focuses only on size and produces undesirable incentives. they said several years of testing and assessment have given regulators a better understanding of the threshold and given the intensity and complexity of around stress testing, regulators haven't felt the additional regulations don't warrant the expenditures associated with those large institutions. i guess my question to you is another way of asking the same question that

mdm. clerk, do you have any announce