mearaji, an expert on international issues, mr. moradi . hello.d morning, i am at your service good morning, considering that when the hair is short, what is the reason for this trip and that in the past, last month , we saw another message from the us authorities to china, how do you evaluate the reason for this trip? the trip will be investigated. first, there is the information of the technical and professional organization and the work that mr. john kerry said today , he is the special representative of the united states in climate affairs. their own economic costs at the expense of water and the air of the whole planet is very important to find this trip in coordination, and the second is from the political point of view, as you said, the third trip of a high-ranking american official who travels to china, it seems that the united states has commented that, well, after the mrs. police, the speaker of the house of representatives, the former speaker of the house of representatives of the united states intends to take action to reduce tensions

mearaji, an expert on american and international affairs, haji. good morning. mr. moradi, hello, good morning. do you have a message for me , mr. moradi? hello, apparently, this has been established. mr. moradi, hello, good morning. at the same time, he says that europeans agree about ukraine that most nato members were against giving cluster bombs, while most of the countries of the world are using this to please . there is definitely a contradiction in mr. biden's words . you are right about nato's first power. it is not a high justifying power for his actions in nato . harrow actually banned these weapons the contradiction in mr. biden's speech was that by the year 2019 , the united states would be linked to these 120 countries and treat excessive itching. in fact, the use of such weapons . in the era of power, trump actually vowed to make this decision, and today we are witnessing that he is sending messages to other countries, including ukraine , and dealing with international disputes. i agree, but america is against this case how will these meetings, which a