channels to say media freedom wunder threat.he government said it's not just about collarin but about diversifying ownership of the news media, splitting the media market into 3s, a third for the government, a third for the private sector and another for community-run outlets. >> five years later, argentine is trying to make sense of the financial story, seeing a polarized coverage with no middle ground. >> if you read newspapers like clarin, la nation, you are getting one side of the story. if you read something like paki nadose, you are getting the government's side. i don't think clarin has ever spoken to anybody from the government in 10 years. now, pakinidose, their coverage to me is good, but at times, they seem like they are kissing the feet of the government. >> this story about us in a default is just a continuation of hundreds of front page stories by collarin saying that we are larn saying that we are in a recession, salaries go down. >> they are not only a newspaper that opposes the government. they represent the fin

street, the media.'re not on my side. i'm not going to pay attention to the media. i'm not going to trust them. that's what wrong with chelsly clinton being on tv. >> joe, a quick final thought. >> how could i follow that? gallop, 60% of democrats have a fair or greater amount of trust with the media. 31% of independents, 26% of republicans. that goes back to the charles crowdhammer equip about its success and its ability to appeal to a niche audience, half the country. that's because republicanes and independents, democrats maybe now because they like what they're hearing, howie. >> i'm too depressed to do the rest of the show. thank you, guys. >>> after the break, espn goes there with openly gay player michael sam. diane sawyer says she's not slowing down as she gives up her anchor chair and steven coal bare says he's worried about me. he's the guy that should be worried. that is next. test 'wóóÑt >>> time for our digital download. one group has an unusual i high level of abuse. >> tell me about it, m

it's not just the media. it's true for all sorts of institutions. >> institutions by and large are taking a hit. the financial institutions, the congress, a political agencies media. i think there's a moment where there's not a lot of confidence that things are legit. that's why if you scour the internet even for five minutes you can see all kinds of message boards that talk about just skepticism that things are legit and the media even just by virtue of the fact that they're delivering the information that people are concerned about i think is in that morass. >> i say is it possible it's both? sometimes some articles or segments feel so conservative, others might feel too liberal on the shaame channel or newspaper. >> there's something that happens. very often the media attempts to do the split screen. here is the liberal, here is the conservative, you fight it out. this allows a viewer to say because there's a line rberal oe screen, it lets the viewer say they have that bias or the other way around. i belie

the media has some parts, have scrutinized the nfl.spn does not get a lot of credit for their investigation because they have a $15 billion deal with the nfl. we however, they are the ones on friday who released this smoke gun story about would knew what and when with the ray rice video. the reason it has spurred so much outrage is because for years the nfl turn add lend eye to this behavior and now it has exploded in all of the graphic detail in the horrible video. >> and the espn story, to fill in people, it was an extraordinary deficit reporting that accused of way venezuela of coverup saying they knew in hours that there was an elevator video showing ray rice pumping his buy. >> great work by espn but they are hit california -- hypocritical. i wrote about the united states women soccer goalie since bill clinton was president, winning two gold medicals the most 307 particular female athlete and on espn, on thursday night, there she is playing, why does that matter? she is on two counts of domestic abuse charges, one again hence teen

here, much of the media beating the drums for war?>> no. i see the media reflecting what's going on in public and in turn reflecting what our leaders are saying. i think it's a healthy sign and a rare moment -- >> you don't see it the other way around where the constant coverage and the demand to do something is actually promptingÑ forcing, influencing politicians to want to get on this bandwagon at the poll change? >> there may be something circular about it. but the important thing is, you've got opinion leaders on the left and the right, the left reluctantly saying yes, we're going to have to do something about these guys and on the right saying do even more. so when the american public decides the right and left is hearing their opinion leaders, their thought leaders, it shows that we actually still can rally around something, whatever it is. now, give us a few weeks and we'll fall apart at the disagreement again. but for now, at least -- >> but you've raised the question about whether or not the media is on board because it's in

midterm media madness. >>> chuck todd making his debut at "meet the press" with a presidential interview. can he revive the damaged press after the damage done by david gregory. >>> plus, the hackers that leaked the nude sebly photos. excuse me, what about the endless media that run stars with topless sun bathing or who have wardrobe malfunctions? aren't they exploiting women? i'm howard kurtz and this is "media buzz." >>> president obama getting hammered by the media told reporters overseas this week that he wants to degrade and destroy isis. but he also used this language. >> we can continue to shrink isil's sphere of influence, its effectiveness, its financing, its military capabilities to the point where it is a manageable problem. >> and he's drawing flack for words like manageable. liberal world like dan na millbank accusing obama of happy talk. >> people saying they don't want to see their president be hawkish, but they hate to see him weakish. only a few are defending the president. >> if president

media and canadian media for science of nothing. >> the foley story fits clearly into a narrative we see in the u.s. media, that wants to identify is victim headed by members of i.s.i.s. and they want the story that they are covering to have a clear moral compass about what is right and wrong, who is good, who is evil. the story in saudi arabia, from the u.s. perspective is complicated and ambiguous. we are not sure how to slot in the people beheaded. >> all media exists not in a vacuum, but in relationship to an audience, and journalism is going to be sympathetic, and more aligned with audience that it serves, than with a distant remote remote audience. when a westerner is executed. western nations pay attention. when journalists struggle, they recognise that there are unjust deaths around the world every day. if you overlode the audience with information that is not compelling or interesting, the audience will turn away and you have, in essence, become ipp effective -- ipp effective. >> the foley video was designed for response, and it did. binyamin netanyahu likened the i.s.i.s. a

. >> two former fcc chairman talk about media mergers and then in 30 minutes former president's bill clinton and george w. bush launch a leadership training program and texas senator ted cruz said americans who fight with isis should be stripped of their united states citizenship. that is later. >> c-span created by america's cable companies 35 years ago and brought to you as a public service by your local cable or satellite provider. >>> on the communicators we are here to discuss the media corporations. michael copps and robert mcdowell. mr. copps, should the time warner and comcast merger go through? >> guest: absolutely not. it is against the interest of the consumers and it is another chapter in the consolidation chap chapter that is wreaking havoc. >> host: what is your issue with consolidation? >> you have companies in control of the news and information and we rely on this information to govern ourselves and it has been a never ending tail. i went to the commission in 2001 thought knowing i would be spending 75% of the time hearing the ceo's coming in saying we have to get bi

but what will happen with the liberal media? you talk to the liberal voters and a lot of democrats who were sort of frustrated with the president they are now unhappy he is sounding like judge w. bush so msnbc that has that large an audience feeling that way will they go after him using terms like "evil," and wanting to destroy them. >> why do we not hear that? is there an instinct among the liberal commentators to support the democratic president? >> it is early. we are in the middle of midterm elections, 37 days away from this and partisan networks have a little bit of an interest there and there is an interest what voters are saying on the ground. if you see the visuals of people going after obama 9 media will shift. >> but it is partisan hypocrisy. the antiwar movement was an antibush movement so you remove bush and the negative goes out of it. something that the media should focus on is the statement that the president has made repeatedly thatback wrack is decimated, on the verge of defeat and on the run and now country aft

media buzz with howie kurtz starts right now and it's a great show. see you tomorrow. >>> as president obama sxapdz the war on isis to syria, the media debate turns more serious. >> i agree entirely that the strike was politically and diplomatically value and important and for all the reasons. militarily, i think this was basically a slight show. >> are people like me going to buy it? >> let us know when you decide. and will journalists continue to ask tough questions about whether the administration is a military strategy can skis? the white house insists on editing some reports that correspondents distranscript to each other after presidential events. is that over the line? lois lerner breaks her silence, but refuses to answer questions about the irs scandal. was her interview revealing or did it create sympathy for a whom who has taken the fifth? >>> plus, jon stewart after the folks complained that they were sandbagged. >> we learned laird some didn't enjoy the experience. >> i'm howard kurtz and this is media buzz. the pundits have been hammering

but i think the media has also -- some parts of the media have scrutinized the nfl.u look at espn, they don't get credit for a lot of their investigations because they have a $15 billion deal with the nfl. but they're the ones who, on friday, released this smoking gun story about who knew what when about the ray rice video. so i think the reason this has spurred so much outrage is because, for years, the nfl has turned a blind eye to this behavior. now it's exploded in all of its graphic detail in that horrible video. >> and howie, let me just fill in people that haven't seen it. it was an extraordinary bit of story basically saying the team knew within hours that there was an elevatorer video from the casino showing ray rice punching his wife. >> great work by espn, but they're also hypocritical. i wrote earlier this week about hope solo. she's the women's u.s. so many soccer goalie. she's won two gold medals, arguably the most popular female athlete in the country. on espn on thursday night, there's hope solo playing. why does that mean matter? she's up for two cou

how do the media cover it? our media panel weighs in. jon: fox news alert. 8:23 in the mon morning in california. look what is going on in santa clarita. look at the truck tumbled over highway. five people in the truck and one of them we're told is still trapped. they had been riding four-wheelers in the canyon apparently through much of the night. went to leave this morning and missed the curve. truck is in the canyon. somebody is still stuck inside. they have extricated four people but the rescue effort underway in santa clarita. we'll take you back in as we get more information. shannon: new info on the ebola epidemic in west africa. one scientist at the university of minnesota saying transmission of virus through thousands of victims, could cause mutations and could let ebola spread through the air instead of direct contact with bodily fluids. according to the world health organization, 4200 people have been infected in this outbreak. nearly 2300 have died. experts warn each new case is statistical roll of the dice, making the virus

is there a media drumbeat for war? >> a dramatic reversal on immigration with the white house leak news that president obama is delaying a promise to issue an order before the election. is the press buying into the spin? >> political coverage in high gear as the fall election season is underway with republicans still favored to capture the senate. is the press playing up certain issues and playing up others? our new segment "midterm media madness." >> and a presidential interview on "meet the press," and outrage over the hackers would leaked the nude celebrity photos. what about the media organization that run images, endless images, of the stars? aren't they exploiting women? this is "media buzz." >> president obama getting hammered by the media and told reporters he wanted to destroy isis but he also used this language. >> we can continue to shrink isis sphere of influence, effectiveness, financing their military capabilities to the point where it is manageable problem. >> he is drawing plaque for words like "managea

one of the roles it's led in challenging the mainstream media, so we see the role of social media.it doesn't pull out in the same way. >> from what you've said and the slant you're talking about, it really will expose how effective media's role is in changing people's opinions, directing their thoughts. >> well, as a media scholar, absolutely i've been looking at the way the media and people's attitudes and behaviors and how they would lean in an election like that. but then what you would have to then see is very interesting. the polls are predicting that it's going to be head-to-head. you have to be thinking i how the mainstream media and the support it's give the no-campaign may not be as effective as imagined. the mobilizing the support villa the variety of different groups involved in social media campaign, the campaigns have been very, very good connecting with the grassroots and doing the door-to-door campaigning that is so important. but what is also the case is that you're beginning from a possession of--and thi this is not peculiar to scotland, but there is a level of dis

media. people love him. they think he's an intellect. if it was any other person, then they would absolutely go after this story. but because eat at cnn and because he's invited to all the right parties, it's just hands off. it's clear -- this is the way the d.c. media works. >> well, actually, he's in new york, but i guess you could say the d.c. ala carte of d.c. media. i want to mention that jeff zucker says he has complete confidence in zakaria. a source close to the cnn program tells me that of the questionable scripts from the cnn program, not his outside writing, that these were written by producers and later approved by faree ed zakaria. he did apologize a couple of years ago for which a piece that was similar to others in the new yorker. >>> coming up, fred francis on whether the media are swallowing propaganda by running that is shock and awe footage of the air raid against isis. i'm eric shawn. see you back at the top of the hour. now back to media buzz and howie. >>> we've all seen this spectacular footage of the air strikes a

we have to see clearly this is the first social media war. in the way the vietnam war was the first television war, this is the first social media war. that isis has proved to be very adept, very talented, if you will, you always hope evil won't be, in ratcheting up the hysteria, ratcheting up the image of their influence far beyond what their actual military capabilities are. we have to understand the media and the country has to understand that a lot of this is about the psychology of pop grahn da. think about it. three beheadings and by the way i say in my own mind are we certain they have beheaded these people but assuming they have, that three beheadings are enough to move american public opinion, change our foreign policy, and take this nation to war. >> that's a point that fareed zakaria made in the last hour saying nothing has changed about isis except these videos. >> this is to me the most troublesome part of this. first of all, we should note nobody has shown the most graphic of pictures. at least nobody except the most fringe part

and it, that idea really picked up on social media, when it became common. because then it was clear that users have this opportunity to not only, you know, read or watch content on the internet, but also to contribute, to post their own pictures and their own ideas and their own opinions. so, you know, the idea -- while the internet did emerge out of this sort of public-spirited, academic community, as it spread, we've sort of created this mythology around it. and i think we're at an interesting tipping point because right now we're seeing that there could be a darker side, that there could be some problems if we sort of don't intervene and try to protect the qualities that we find so appealing about it. you know, what i'm alluding to is revelations about surveillance or invasion of privacy or fact that there are now these sort of giant multi-national corporations, google and facebook and amazon, that are engaging in business practices that respect that different than old media companies, and so we're finally being investigated and challenged on antitrust g

social media has really erased that younger people who have grown up with social media make that very intimate contact on line so intimate that they can have that confidence to either carry out act of violence here at home or travel overseas to join jihad and syria in iraq. >> catherine, thank you. coming up, we investigate the allusive leader of isis and learn some surprising new facts. that's next. >>> so who is the leader of isis? here's what we know about the allusive and viciousz al:=$ baghdadi. [speaking foreign language] >> little is known about america's most wanted terrorist. 43-year-old abu al baghdadi. the isis leader has a 10-million-dollar u.s. bounty on his head. in july, he made a rare public appearance at a mosque in mosul, iraq. wearing what appeared to be an expensive watch he commonly cleaned his teeth before speaking to captive audience. the leader of isis went on a 15 minute rant. [ al baghdadi has claimed himself two different terms the. >> when video of baghdadi posted online, it was the first time many of his followers had ever laid eyes on him al bad dagy was

you are not mainstream media. you are a blogger but you are a blogger that i would guess most if not everybody in this room reads. you are a source for a lot of information. you pass a lot of information through. what is the role of asian-american bloggers because we have a strong voice as you know? the mainstream media and asian-american nation media tends to look down on bloggers cht what do you think the role is? >> i have never considered myself a traditional journalist and never intended for that to happen. it evolves over time. now i kind of see myself -- i never really break stories but i always come across stories that i would like to amplify. i understand there are a lot of asian-americans who read my blog. they are coming to the blog because they are not coming through mainstream sources. they would rather sort of one person or one person's perspective. i see myself as more -- as kind of the role of a town crier in a lot of ways. i see a lot of stuff that i feel like a lot of people -- my audience is not

and western capitals that are directly opposed to what average russian would read and alternative media in general how do you explain it i mean this is really a bizarre set of circumstances we all know it's about geopolitics i know but how can we get so far apart. when it really is and i think we could but i think it's beyond oh well you know all. back in november when we had the first my down protest in the way that those were presented in the western media were very sympathetic to the protesters and we look straight away from watching the b.b.c. or i.t.v. or china or for c.n.n. or any of the western news channels in britain or us that these were supposed to be the good guys and when you straight away that the bad guy was going to coach the leader of ukraine he was portrayed as a dictator he got the milosevic treatment he was he was a he's been in power for three years or sudden he's this vicious dictator clamping down on democratic protests and i can only contrast the coverage the west the news coverage of these protests in them i done with the coverage of a very large and to austerit

coverage from afraid the western news media coverage basically works out that who whichever side is actually pursuing or furthering the interests of the one percent in the west they get the sympathetic treatment and the side they're against is demonized well it doesn't let me go to a living going to amsterdam you can tell that's how it works let me go to cairo if you don't know. it's very interesting is no matter what the narrative is it always has a certain logic a certain conclusion that somehow it's always rush's fault no matter what happens it's always rush's fault even when it seems in a humanitarian convoy it is considered a total horse which of course you have nato already already in ukraine and knots not criticize a whole even pointed out go ahead call in amsterdam. well i think that what we have seen this boss moan for a little over a month is really extraordinary i cannot remember another all creation where the propaganda that has come from the us and is amplified also in britain has been so brace so unanimously or near unanimously by the european mainstream media it's rea

yes, all-around media messages. so giving girls, especially girls the tools they need to really understand media mess annuals that affect their self-esteem and body image so that they an prevent that for themselves and lead healthier lives and be happier people. >> so what are some of the ways that you've seen in your experience that the media messages affect the way we loo at ourselves. >> well, there's so my different ways. the most obvious way is a girl or woman looks at an image, you know, these victoria secret images -- >> the magazines too. >> it's magazes, things on facebook thatirls post of themselves even,nd they just think i need to look like that in order for people to find me attractive andind me likeable. >> and so we were talking about how this affects your self-esteem and your mental health. so this can cause all kinds problems too. >> oh, yeah. it can cause self-esteem problems for sure that run very deep, even down into issues like i'm not going to go for that job, i'm not going to go for that oppor

that's got to make the media crazy.y love injecting stories about race in treatment but terrified when it comes to behavior. >> two separate things. there's spampging your kid and what draen peter son did. i don't think kids spanked grow up to be violent. when i lied i got spanked and i deserved it. didn't grow up to be a violent person but guess what i'm not? a liar. >> you were the spanker, getting the hell kicked out of you every day is a big difference. no clue what he's talking about. >> yeah. and dana, need to point out, talking ak a defenseless child versus maybe you know, trying to conflate it with the women who get domestic violence put upon them. >> maybe there is something. i don't have children. so i can't say as a parent. ip know as a child i got spanked. it wasn't -- more disciplinardi. never with an instrument, except for the wooden spoon. >> ah, the wooden spoon. >> that would hurt. never like a belt. >> you can buy them on abenow. ebay now. >> a note. >> thanks a lot, mom. >>> time to talk about it, wer

social media has really erased that younger people who have grown up with social media make that veryintimate contact on line so intimate that they can have that confidence to either carry out act of violence here at home or travel overseas to join jihad and syria in iraq. >> catherine, thank you. coming up, we investigate the allusive leader of isis and learn some surprising new facts. that's next. i'm not afraid. i can face my 3rd grade class trip. tying shoes, fixing pigtails, and chasing after them when their wonder turns to wander. hannah. new tena instadry. designed for those unexpected leaks with 864 tiny funnels to zip wetness away. and even when you twist not a drop escapes. that's fearless protection poise maximum can't match. (teacher) and i can stay perfectly dry. with tena, i'm not afraid. and you won't be either. call 1-877-get-tena. >>> so who is the leader of isis? here's what we know about baghdadi. [speaking foreign language] >> little is known about america's most wanted terrorist. 43-year-old abu al baghdadi. the isis leader has a 10-million-dollar u.s. bounty on h

the media will be very important thehow they playe that to public, especially with social media and e-mail and all that. >> again, the second area of your research? >> the nature of discovery. turns out discovery is not what most people think in terms of, eureka, i point my telescope and there it is. discovery is always an extended process. when you discover new classes of astronomical objects, it is never you point your telescope and know what you are looking at. when galileo pointed his telescope at saturn and saw these protuberances on the body of the planet, he had no idea what they were. he did not know that rings could have existed. they had never been found before. it took 40 years before someone else determine those could be rings. it is the same thing throughout astronomy. there is a period of something that is detected, and there is a long time to determine what it really is an longer to understand what it is. the lesson i learned from that is that when we detect a signal, as the case of the mars rock shows, it will be an extended process, over years, before we know what it is. a

name callers.here is your media media, then, the media.n surveys ask about the media, they're not being specific. when i ask about your school, maybe they ask about other schools your viewers love you and trust you. other guys not so great. that is the way people perceive media as a generic concept. >> that is true. but the tipping point happens when the meanness came in. all right? that is when the tipping point happened for the regular folks they went do you know what? i don't want to hear people called names on television even if i don't like president obama. i don't like the media doing it i think that is what the tipping point is >> we need to think about the lack of trust in the media as being bad for democracy. first amendment was set up to create a media that served as a surrogate role for the public f they're only getting news from facebook about pop culture or things like that, it's a disservice. it hurts our democracy, a lot. >> i agree 100% with that statement. thank you. plenty more ahead. do american women see isis terror thr

and now we're into not just traditional cable and media, but broadband too. this opportunity creating and dynamic technology that should be opening a new era of media democracy and civic dialogue for us, and it's going down the same road that radio and television and cable went down. it's a tragic way to treat a dynamic technology, and it's a tragic way to treat a democratic country. >> host: robert mcdowell, same question. >> guest: first of all, thank you for having us back. it's always good to be with my friend, mike continues, -- mike copps, we always kept the dialogue civil, not always something that happens in washington. during his six months as chair we had exactly 50 items we voted on, and we voted on them together. he's the only chair with whom i have a 100% voting record which destroy cans our credibility. [laughter] >> thank you, amen. >> guest: anyway, to answer your question finally which is, i'm not here to advocate for or against. i think the deals will be approved. i think if you look at it through the antitrust lens, you don't have comcast t

the attacks on geo represent an attack on pakistan's media.emonstrate orders have come out in support of the network. they call it working the graveyard shift, working at the one desk in the newsroom that editors check in with whenever somebody famous checks out. we are talking about the newspaper's obituary desk. those extended obits don't get written after somebody dies. the obit desk is supposed to have them ready at a home's notice. it's not as if the only obits ready to go are about people who are elderly. it doesn't matter how old you are. a good obit editor is supposed to be prepared for anything. nick muirhead on obituary writing, the dos and don'ts of the craft. >> it's journalism's open morbid secret that news organizations around the world have thousands of prewritten obituaries just waiting for when the time comes. >> we do have many, many obituaries, at least in some stage of pre-writing. we do try to write as many as we can in advance. we have right now about 1500 on file. >> you keep trying to stay ahead of father time, and you

social media has really erased that younger people who have grown up with social media make that very intimate contact on line so intimate that they can have that confidence to either carry out act of violence here at home or travel overseas to join jihad and syria in iraq. >> catherine, thank you. coming up, we investigate the allusive leader of isis and learn some surprising new facts. that's next. ♪ it was the best day -[ laughing ] -yeah! ♪ it was the best day ♪ it was the best day yeah! ♪ it was the best day ♪ 'cause of you we make a great pair. -[echoing] great pair. -huh? progressive and the great outdoors! we make a great pair. right. totally. uh, that's what i was thinking. hmm. covering the things that make the outdoors great. now, that's progressive. call or click today. >>> so who is the leader of isis? here's what we know about the allusive and viciousz al:=$ baghdadi. [speaking foreign language] >> little is known about america's most wanted terrorist. 43-year-old abu al baghdadi. the isis leader has a 10-million-dollar u.s. bounty on his head. in july, he made a rare pu

but social media has erased that and younger people who have grown up with social media make that contact online so intimate they can have that confidence to carry out an act of violence here at home or travel overseas to join the jihad in syria and iraq. >> coming up we investigate the elusive leader of isis and learn surprising new facts. that's next. [ male announcer ] if you had a dollar for every dollar car insurance companies say they'll save you by switching, you'd have, like, a ton of dollars. but how are they saving you those dollars? a lot of companies might answer "um" or "no comment." then there's esurance. born online, raised by technology and majors in efficiency. so whatever they save, you save. hassle, time, paperwork, hair-tearing out, and, yes, especially dollars. esurance. insurance for the modern world. now backed by allstate. click or call. >>> so who is >>> so who is the leader of isis? here's what we know about the elusive and vicious al baghdadi. [ speaking foreign language ]. >> little is known about america's most-wanted terrorist, 43-year-old abu bakr al-baghdad

it seemed like the internet was going to magically solve the problems of the oldede -- old media model. i am an independent filmmaker and i make films about philosophy. so kind of obscure educational films and part of the reason i was drawn to making them is because they were not on television or commercial media. and this seemed to usher in things for independent artist to create an open media landscape and not depend on gatekeepers who can say yes or no and control and influence the flow of communication. so the idea is the internet is open and that you know all of the problems of the old system have gone away. and so i was very interested in the question and the book is sort of me investigating it. how open is the internet? is openness enough? i come to the conclusion that open is a misleading term. it can mean anything to anyone and it is very ambiguous and doesn't necessarily mean equal. the media system that is emerging online isn't necessarily more inviting than the system that proceeded it. a lot of the old problems carried over and i am especially interested in that. >> host:

they've lumped us and the media as part of the problem. if they think the media is doing that. so i think symbolism wise, political journalists are front and center of the they don't get it. so i think what's, quote, unquote, broken is the credibility of us in the media channelling the frustrations of americans. >> is that a fair critique on the part of the viewers? >> yes, i do think it is. this is something that i always like to use the phrase sell a corridor. the new york washington take ignores what's going on in america. it's that disconnect that leads to the perception that, you know, this show's broken, that show's broken, whatever. it's really about this lack of credibility that did the political reporters really understand? >> i have the political journalism professor on and they said maybe people like you should come on and say, we're part of the problem and we should address it. it sounds like you agree? >> i think when it comes to the economy and the recession, we generally didn't do -- we have not understood the depth of the problem. >> is it the insider versus out

so i compare the media to speeches of the politicians. then i have the statistical method that gives the number to the content(ñ so what that means is a "the new york times" will sound like good joe lieberman speech. although people call him the of moderate he is actually left of center he is midway between arlen specter and 90 pelosi. someone if it says "the new york times" would like the joe lieberman speech said he would have a 75 on the scale. >> host: give us one example how you got joe lieberman at 75 and then york times? >> okay. a recent example but the main way that i judge how liberal or conservative his speech is or the media content is the think tank cetaceans. i have a list of 300 at think tanks from the heritage foundation, to the institute, those on the left. i tell the ratio with the "new york times." but but that sucks -- but that is from that that did it turns out joe lieberman would have the same ratio. in addis from more than the heritage foundation but that content sounds like the joe lieberman speech. >> is content s

light on the behind the scenes the plume of sea over ukraine in an interview with russian national media riff anoxia sums up the key points for us. i just came back from ukraine where we were walking for one month and this time we've missed a very dramatic escalation in speaking and made this very dangerous spread of violence in ukraine's east london are supporting has shared his opinion on why it is happening. how can anyone say it's ok to open fire with artillery and multiple rocket launchers on cities do you really expect people to do nothing and wait for their own deaths so what's happening now is a natural reaction by the people who live there and who are defending their rights they want those who took up weapons first blood and put in has also commented on upcoming parliamentary elections in ukraine saying that it will nor help is the tensions in the country. all the candidates want to show how tough they are in the current circumstances it's hard to imagine anyone will advertise their peace plan there's no alternative to a military solution to the problem president putin has also

but social media could also be their their undoing. we'll explain when we come back. >> announcer: tomorrow night, battle lines around the world. what's more dangerous here at home? ebola, isis or rogue police officer? seven billion hungry people. well, we grow a lot of food. we also waste about a third of what we grow. so, we put our scientists to work. and they found ways to keep the food we grow fresher, longer. using innovative packaging. there are still a lot of hungry people in the world. but we have a lot of scientists. this is the human element at work. dow. so i can reach ally bank 24/7, but there are24/7branches? it's just i'm a little reluctant to try new things. what's wrong with trying new things? feel that in your muscles? yeah... i do... try a new way to bank, where no branches equals great rates. into one you'll never forget. earn points for every flight and every hotel. expedia plus rewards. ♪ ♪ imagine the luxury... of not being here. the power you want with the fuel economy you dream of. performance with a conscience

i want to read a little bit of my book and this the chapter on media distortion. the media is largely to blame for misconceptions about growly and there are two reasons for this. local stations started their news broadcast about stories. the sandy hook massacre was particularly horrific because it was innocent school children. it was a rare event but the media went wall to wall with coverage of newtown for weeks. then obama and bloomberg used this plan to launch the so-called assault weapons bans. anti-gun bias plays a role in this. mainstream media outleterize based in new york, washington, d.c., and los angeles. few reporters are gun owners or any familiarity with fire department and they are constantly making mistakes about gun term and functions. their ignorance was exposed after the president was shown shooting and labelled the gun a rifle instead of a shotgun. a rifle shoots a single straight bullet and a shotgun fires pellets that fire in several areas. skeet shooting, which obama claims to do all of the time, is done with a shotgun in order to have a chanc

but could i interest the why the media missed this? and i include fox news on this, we didn't talk about it i think until yesterday, and it would have been nice if we had done one less sharpton story and one more of this brendan story. so the most important thing i'm going to say today, why do we focus on issues like race, ray rice, trayvon, ferguson while we ignore the radical islamic threat? because these others speak to a greater evil in which the media can indict all of us on. the media has been trained to degrade america has flawed. if you're at war with radical islam, then you cannot be at war with yourself, that's why the media shies away from this because it doesn't follow their aationations because it -- >> what's been sickening to me, is since ferguson, people who do speak out against radical islam, the media would quicker target me or somebody on the media network for targeting radical islam. >> up until today, the obama administration has refused to say war when speaking about radical slaucislam. what greg is pointing out,

there's a media leave us so we leave that may be. why the scene pushes security player your party years ago to wear shoes that no one is asking with the guests that deserve answers from. politicking only on our team. of. c.b.s. this is our. propaganda. that is the state sponsor of russia today program just more likely to be enough like. this that is just ridiculous non answer to my question. john is not. supporting their safety and sometimes their lives all over the place to bring people stories none the taliban the taliban don't want you to see and we come here. you're tuned in to the weekly welcome buck islamist militants in libya have taken over a part of the us embassy which was a factor waited a month ago stuff for polls i choose to increasing lawlessness in the country with rampaging warlords and the militias seizing control or we ask the editor of the pan african newswire what happens not. the security situation in libya is becoming even more precarious the united states anticipating that this would happen pulled out its perso

the social media really erased that.younger people who have grown-up with social media they have very intimate contact on-line, so intimate they can have that confidence to either carry out an act of violence at home or travel overseas to join jihad and syria and iraq. >> coming up we investigate the elusive leader of isis and learn surprising new facts. surprising new facts. that's next. the performance review. that corporate trial by fire when every slacker gets his due. and yet, there's someone around the office who hasn't had a performance review in a while. someone whose poor performance is slowing down the entire organization. i'm looking at you phone company dsl. go to comcastbusiness.com/ checkyourspeed. if we can't offer faster speeds or save you money we'll give you $150. comcast business built for business. al can i two different terms, the kalif which means successor to mohammed. >> it was the first time many of his followers ever had laid eyes on him when he posted on-line. >> al baghdaddy was known sometime

but social media has erased that and younger people who have grown up with social media make that contact online so intimate they can have that confidence to carry out an act of violence here at home or travel overseas to join the jihad in syria and iraq. >> coming up we investigate the elusive leader of isis and learn surprising new facts. that's next. ♪ [ male announcer ] "west" didn't end where columbus landed. not on the banks of the mississippi, or even the coast of california. the new ram 1500 ecodiesel. with 9,200 pounds of towing and 28 highway miles per gallon. west will never end. guts. glory. ram. s charlie. west will never end. his long day of doing it himself starts with back pain... and a choice. take 4 advil in a day or just 2 aleve for all day relief. honey, you did it! baby laughs! >>> so who is the leader of >>> so who is the leader of isis? here's what we know about the elusive and vicious al baghdadi. [ speaking foreign language ]. >> little is known about america's most-wanted terrorist, 43-year-old abu bakr al-baghdadi. the isis leader has a $10 million u.s. bounty o

i might use media on the screen. i might have a laptop bringing a power plants and slides and showing videos, but i do not want them fragmenting themselves. yet when it comes time for exam they are allowed to have all media access possible. >> host: why? >> guest: because in their workplace there will never be a time where they are cut off from that resource. to test them by saying what can you memorize is not actually a real test. the moment that kids are and they have access to all information. the question is, how could you sort through too many options in a limited time frame. that is the challenge of the workplace. given all of the options, how do you see through things, read carefully, analyze, make wise decisions given almost too many options. >> host: craig detweiler, you close "igods" with the question, is technology enslaving ask? what is the answer. >> guest: i guess we will come to see technology like smart phones as something every day, already moving into glasses, google glasses i think we will come to

replacedhink we have what we have lost in traditional media. somethingve to do about it. >> what is that? >> number one we have to learn to say no to some of these mergers. we have to get out of this mindset, everything is going to be all right if we continue down the road we are on. we have to get serious about competition. so many people say it's too late. but it is not too late. even if you have all of these big companies, it is difficult to reverse the trend. we have spectrum auctions coming up. we have opportunities to open that a small business, entrepreneurs, minorities and women who have been the service our auctions in and businesses generally. we could have more targeted policies. spectrum caps. spectrum screens at work. if you're not using spectrum you should use it -- lose it. instead of just warehousing it. we do have to throw in mattel. are in this we the workingshrough of natural law or market inevitability, we're there because of policy the fcc has made. policy that has enhanced consolidation, that have done away with public int