the servant of themis is known for freeing alexander from imprisonment medvidy accused of kidnapping and torturing activists of the revolution of dignity, ihor lutsenko and yuri verbytsy. the latter was brutally killed. on january 22, 2014, verbytskyi's body was found in the forest 500 meters from the hnidyn petrivske road. the investigation established that oleksandr medvid. who participated in the abduction of activists from oleksandrivska hospital, after which they were transported to the suburbs of kyiv, where they were molested and beaten. lidia shchebunyaeva passed the verdict, in which she expressed her conviction that yury verbytsky did not die because of the torture of medvidy and his company, and because he froze in the winter forest. lidia shchebunyaeva has quite a long track record, but the most, probably, she stood for because of the fact that she justified , in fact, did not see them, severe consequences, discrimination of inflicting physical pain, consequences and death, journalist verbytsy, activist during the revolution of dignity, this and many other things, unfortu

at the time of the announcement of medvidy's sentence on april 23, the case had already been pendingeveral years, and the statutes of limitations and prosecution for "committing a crime" had coincided, so even though medvidy was found guilty, he was released from punishment at the same time. also, lidia shchebunyaeva tried her a colleague from the pechersk district court of the city of kyiv, the odious maidan judge, viktor kityuk. in 2020, she acquitted kityuk, because she did not see the nature of the crime in his actions. the systematic nature of such decisions is being monitored. judge viktor katsyuk's maidan, she was in her time. was justified by considering cases about the judicial decision of the head of the court, which, by the way, the constitutional court in its preliminary composition recognized as unconstitutional, but then, even before that, she also did not see the composition of the crime in the adoption of the known judicial decision by judge kytsyuk, who is also, well, probably one of the most odious kyiv judges who persecuted activists during the maidan for a trip to

years, and the statute of limitations for prosecution for the crime had coincided, so even though medvidy was found guilty, he was released from punishment at the same time. also lydia... shchebunyaeva tried her colleague from the pechersk district court of kyiv, the odious maidan judge, viktor kityuk. in 2020, she acquitted kytsyuk, because she did not see the nature of the crime in his actions. the systematicity of such decisions is followed by the judge of the maidan, viktor kytsyuk, at one time , she acquitted herself by considering cases of judicial decision administered by the constitutional court, by the way. recognized as unconstitutional even in a preliminary composition, but then, even before that, she also did not see the composition of the crime in the adoption of the well-known judicial decision judge kitsyuk, who is also, well, probably one of the most odious kyiv judges , who persecuted activists during the maidan for traveling to mezhygiya, lidiyueva was transferred to the district court of kyiv in 2015. since 2003, she has been a judge of the khartsy city court of donetsk

the issue of shchebunyaeva's resignation, for the time of the announcement after the sentencing of medvidy on april 23, the proceedings of the case had been going on for several years, and the statutes of limitations for prosecution for the crime had coincided, so even though medvidy was found guilty, he was released from punishment at the same time. lidia shchebunyaeva also tried her colleague from the pechersk district court of kyiv, the odious maidan judge viktor kityuk. in 2020, she acquitted kytsyuk, because she did not... see the nature of the crime in his actions, the systematicity of such decisions is being followed, she acquitted the maidan judge viktor kytsyuk at one time, due to considering cases about presided over judicial decision, which, by the way, the constitutional court in its preliminary composition recognized as unconstitutional, but then, even before that, she also did not see the composition of the crime in the adoption of the known judicial decision by judge kytsyuk. who is also, well, probably one of the most odious judges of kyiv , who persecuted activists during

verdict in which she expressed her conviction. that yury verbytsiy died not because of the torture of medvidy and his company, but because he froze in the winter forest, lidia shchebunyaeva has a rather long track record, but most of all, she probably became famous because of the fact that she justified, in fact, did not see, the serious consequences of kidnapping causing physical pain . and the death of the journalist verbytskyi, an activist during the revolution of dignity, this and many other things, unfortunately, did not also become the reason for the supreme council of justice to at least suspend consideration of the issue of shchebunyaeva's resignation, at the time of the announcement of medvid's sentence on april 23 tho, consideration of the case has been going on for several years, and the statute of limitations for prosecution for the crime has expired of the crime, coincided, therefore, although medvyd was found guilty, he was simultaneously released from punishment. also, lidia shchebunyaeva tried her colleague from the pechersk district court of kyiv, the odious judge of the maid

consideration of the issue of shchebunyaeva's resignation, on at the time of the announcement of medvidy'stence on april 23, the case had already been pending for several years, and the statute of limitations for prosecution for the crime had coincided. therefore, even though medvid was found guilty, he was simultaneously released from punishment. lidia shchebunyaeva also judged his colleague from the pechersk district court of the city of kyiv, the odious judge of the maidan, viktor kityuk. in 2020, she acquitted kityuk, because she did not see the nature of the crime in his actions. the systematicity of such decisions is monitored. at one time, she acquitted viktor kytsyuk's maidan, due to a judicial decision that, by the way, was considered unconstitutional by the constitutional court in a previous session, but then, even before that, she also did not see the nature of the crime in the adoption of a known right-wing decision by judge kytsyuk, who there is also, well, probably one of the more odious judges of kyiv, who persecuted activists during the maidan for a trip to mezhyhiy. lidia