it is a blatant cover-up by meese. they have a couple of other meetings with all the other high-level people and spin the story. here's what happened, the president didn't know, ok? nobody says anything. schultz comes back saying they are building a wall around the president. at the meeting, nobody says a thing, even though weinberger knew he knew, they all knew. as far as whether reagan did in fact no, this was a big question and huge disagreement among all concerned. investigators, anybody you talk to. half of them can't believe that reagan didn't know about it because this was one of his most important subjects, policy topics. his aides know that. they did nothing but try to go out and get answers to the hostages. every meeting you had, as i understand it, and with, what are we going to tell the president about where the hostages are? the same with the contras. it's inconceivable that reagan would just stop asking questions about how we were keeping these guys together for two years. the other half says, poindexter

that within a speech given by edwin meese, then attorney general in 1985 explaining the federalist society credo. on its basis it sounds at least arguably defensible, there would be an organization that is so committed to the constitution that it once supreme court nominees that will follow is literally as possible, but as justice william brennan on the supreme court said, if they think they can find in those musty volumes in the 18th century all the answers to all the questions on the issues we face today, here is what he called it, that is arrogance posing as humility. arrogance posing as humility. that is what they said the federalist society was all about. if that were all the federalist society was about, you could argue they should have their day in court, choosing someone from the supreme court but it is more than that. when you look at those who finance the federalist society, it is a short list because they refuse to disclose their donors was when you look at those who support the federalist society, the classic names are republican support, the koch brothers, the mercer family, t

this sounds like ed meese to them.the republican white house who is always the carrier of the flame, the voice to -- the conduit to the grassroots and that person's job is always to say okay, grassroots, let's cool it. we need to know when to fight these battles and need to know when to stand down and bannon needs to learn that role if he's to survive. >> the problem with bannon versus ed meese is meese had a background in the business before he got to washington. >> that's right. >> and ed meese would never in a million years suggest he was the brains behind ronald reagan. not in a billion years would he do that. steve bannon was running a website in july. >> yeah. >> has been running around, promoting himself, suggesting that he is donald trump's -- the genius that put nationalism in donald trump's brain. we can show the clip all day. it's just nonsense. >> think again, we talked about it at the time, that 10, 11, 12 days after president trump was sworn into office, steve bannon was on the cover of "time" magazine. >

women, speak up because these men can be brought down and to meese men, it can catch up with you. >>hat president trump tweeted his support for bill o'reilly. >> in sexual awareness month. >> i think president trump needs to learn that he doesn't have to comment on everything. he's president, not a commentator, and when he gets asked about sexual harassment, if no other topic, that one, he should leave the hell alone. >> thanks one and all. appreciate. it did the government deport an undocumented immigrant with protected status in the department of homeland security says one thing and the lawyer for the immigrant says another and now the feds are changing the reason for their actions. stay with us. tech: when your windshield needs to be fixed... trust safelite autoglass. our exclusive trueseal technology means a strong, reliable bond. at safelite, we stand behind our work... because the ones you love, sit behind it. (parents whisper jingle) safelite repair, safelite replace. why pause a spontaneous moment? cialis for daily use treats ed and the urinary symptoms of bph. tell your doct

as you think about the questions, meese be concise and that will allow for more dialogue. this is a room of friends and we are midwest nice if nothing else so i know the conversations will the soft and polite as we go through this very important conversation. we have two important guests. both new yorkers who have come to visit us. nikole hannah jones is an award-winning investigative reporter covering racial and justice in the "new york times" magazine where she has spent five years investigating the way racial selling degree gages and housing and schools is maintained through official actions and policies. won several national awards, including the peabody award, the ward for public service and a finalist for a the national magazine award. she has been named journalist of the year for the national association of black journalis and a route 100. a 2017 new america fellow, and she is the author of "living apart: how government betray the civil rights law". she has been a guest on "face the nation," "this american life" and many others. she has received and earned a bachelo

it goes back to a speech by edwin meese when he tried to come up with definitions about what they were all about. he said they were rooted in the text of the constitution as illuminated who drafted, proposed and ratified them. he called this federalist society the standard of jurisprudence of original intention contrasted it with the misuse of history by jurists who saw in the constitutional spirit things like quote, concepts of human dignity, closed quote, which they turned the constitution into a charter for judicial activism, have we heard these phrases? judge gorsuch is an organizationalist. but if you are going to get into that what it is all about, read the words of justice brennan and said anyone who studied in the archives knew better than to believe the ratifying did tions offered a sing you lar verdict. brennan called the idea that modern judges could discern the framers' original intention as ignorance. so excuse me if i'm skeptical about the good reason why the federalist society gets to pick judicial supreme court nominees for republican presidents. perhaps let me suggest

that was in a speech that was given by edwin meese, then-attorney general, in 1985 explaining the federalist society credo. on its face, it sounds at least arguably defensible that there would be an organization that is so committed to the constitution that it wants supreme court nominees that will follow it as literally as possible, but as justice william brennan on the supreme court said, if they think they can find in those musty volumes back in the 18th century all the answers to all the questions on the issues that we face today, here's what he called it. that's arrogance posing as humility. arrogance posing as humility. but that's what they said the federalist society was all about. if that were all that the federalist society was about, then i guess you could argue they ought to have their day in court, their day in choosing someone for the supreme court. but it's more than that. when you look at those who finance the federalist society -- and it's a short list because they refuse to disclose their donors. when you look at those who support the federalist society, the classic names in

you can either get a box set that has 13 meeses with 80 different combinations or individual watches,s depending on the style you choose but all mix and match pieces so you can create the kind of color that just feels right to you in that particular moment. really great deal on these, normally 35 to 70. these are all slashed by 60%. $14 to $28 so boxed set, 24 to 28. a single watch starts at $14. i love that. okay, so this is really fun. >> food. >> food, this is from a company in pittsburgh, they make these -- they call them their wacky twists and wacky cracker sets, so for the crackers, the seasoning that you'll mix with your favorite saltines or crackers will turn these into gourmet treat, no cooking, no mess, no fuss. these absorb into the crackers or for pretzels they adhere to the crackers. i got a little lesson in gourmet snacking. >> adhere. >> adhere or absorb. depending on the set you choose, 35 to $36 all slashed in half, 16 to $17.50. really nun. last up, creativity for kids. >> i love split these are really fun kits. we've got trip and zor helping us out playing, coloring

because back to speech in 1985 by edwin meese to the federalist society where he tried to come up with some basic definitions of what they were all about. he said they were rooted in the text of the constitution as illuminated by those who drafted proposed and ratified it. he called this federalist society standard a jurisprudence of original intention, contrasted it with the misuse of history by jurists who saw the constitutions sphere things like quote concepts of human dignity, close quote. of which they were trying to constitution into a charter for judicial activism. have we heard these phrases, originalism, judicial activism? over and over and over and we are told rest easy, neil gorsuch is an original list. but if you're going to get into a real analysis of what constitution originalism is all about, be sure to read the words of justice william brennan who said that anyone who would ever studied in the archives knew better than to believe the records of the constitutional convention and the ratifying conventions offered so certain exact and singular of verdict as that which edwi

it goes back to the speech by edwin meese to the federalist society where he tried to come up with basic definitions of what they were all about. he said that they were rooted in the text of the constitution and is illuminated by those that proposed and ratified it. he called the federalist society a jurisprudence of original intention contrasted with the misuse of history for things like concepts of human dignity which they turned the constitution into a charter for judicial activism. have we heard these phrases, original was on, over and over and we are told rest easy. he is an originalist but if you are going to get into a real analysis of what it is all about, be sure to read the words of justice william brennan who said anyone that ever studied in the archives knew better than to believe that a constitutional convention offered so certain in a singular verdict is that which they expected to find. they called the idea that modern judges could assert the original intention, quote, little more than arrogance and humility. so excuse me if i'm skeptical about the good reason that federal