if we want to improve the home and say that megamansioning in an r2 district is cave, but then we done zone and we can't support this viable project, otherwise i personally see a conflict. the five homes going with this particular project all obey a common setback. this house would move into the setback and also really starts to be much, much deeper than the houses which are on the south and you don't see that in the depiction within this packet, but if you go to a1-1 and a1-2, there are only three parcels shown. this is something that should show the ample information about that in oh sources. i am not against the building, don't misunderstand me, but the policy issues with an rh2 zoning and we are asked to approve the home which is significantly larger and without providing a small unit which would meet the objectives of this type of zoning. i am conflicted about what the other securities will have to say. commissioner antonini: i have a little different position as was presented in testimony and staffing and even though the zoning is rh2, which may be a mistake with the homes thauz

the rh-2 zoning in noe valley needs to closely be look at and specifically at this resident and a megamansion in a small rh2 and you go from one car to two car. i think we are completely defeating any larger policy decision with which we are trying to sell everybody else. i cannot participate in supporting that project unless that particular issue has been looked at where we have other neighborhoods we are very strict in what we are enforcing and what we expect when a home gets as large as this one. i cannot support this project not because i don't want this family to have a home, but in this situation the issue is framed the wrong way. president miguel: commissioner sugaya? >> we're never going to rezone the entire noe valley back to rh-1, so that's out of the question and the situation will exist anyway the next time around and the next time around. i'll second the motion. i had something else, but i can't remember what it is.other considerations, there is this setback calculation that staff did and perhaps one additional thing would be to bring it all the way to the front like some of the