requirements, so can we have a motion to waive the residency requirement for mehta? >> i would like to speak to that item. . ing okay, go ahead. >> so, it is one of my personal policies is to not support waivers for residency waivers unless under special extenuating circumstances. i just wanted to i guess wanted to just take a moment to express, i think the purpose of this body is to allow san franciscans an opportunity to begin to have a voice and a representation on the policy discussion in san francisco, so i don't know if there's room for a conversation here on this body, but i am leaning towards not supporting your residency waiver because i think that we have a lot of talented people here in san francisco and i'm not convinced that the list was exhausted of talent that lives and can represent district 6 as well as representing san francisco. i do value the fact that she represents a constituency, the east indian constituency which i believe is a constituency that is not normally represented in san francisco politics, but i don't know if anyone else shared any o

speaker: the clerk: item 28: 28.131103[appointment, child care planning advisory council - deepa mehta]motion appointing deepa mehta, term ending march 19, 2016, to the child care planning and advisory council, residency requirement waived. clerk of the boardd12341234 president david chiu: same house, same call. this motion is approved. next item. speaker: the clerk: item 29: 29.131166[appointment, public utilities revenue bond oversight committee - marina pelosi]motion appointing marina pelosi, term ending january 1, 2016, to the public utilities revenue bond oversight committee. clerk of the board president david chiu: same house, same call. this motion is approved. colleagues, it is 2:30 i want to recognize our special accommodations. i would like to start with our district 5 colleague supervisor breed. supervisor london breed: mr. president, i don't see the folks here yet. president david chiu: why don't we skip those for now and come back to you. supervisor kim. supervisor jane kim: we are also waiting for folks. which supervisor jane kim: no. we are ready. my apology. they were b

mehta? >> hello, supervisors, thank you for your consideration for my appointment to district 6 representatives to supervisor jane kim as a child care provider, my name is deepa mehta, i work for family youth and child care center as an after school coordinator, most of my experience has been in the after school field and the ece field which is early childhood education, i've been working in the tenderloin community for three years now, in addition to working at glide, i'm in the tenderloin safe pathway commission, safe passage provides safe blocks to 400 youth daily for the after school hours. i think i would be a good candidate for the child care council because i would bring diverse toy the the youth and bring the after school perspective to the group, and there's not as much represenon

s mehta data program most likely violated the fourth amendment as part of that ruling a judge richard leon ordered the government to stop collecting data on two plaintiffs who brought the case against the u.s. government will have to wait and see if the supreme court does take up the issue of the n.s.a. very controversial metadata program us president barack obama was asked to identify any specific instance in which analysis of the n.s.a.'s bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack the u.s. president could not identify one instance or at least he did not give one example to the journalists that were asking him now u.s. officials have for many years asked americans to sacrifice some of their privacy in the name of security but so far no top u.s. official can mention any danger imminent danger that's been thwarted through the collection of everyone's personal information. revelations from initially whistleblower edward snowden lashed out to the mainstream media which belonged to the government's violations he made a keynote speech in front of the haikus conference in

s mehta data program most likely violated the fourth amendment as part of that ruling a judge richard leon ordered the government to stop collecting data on two plaintiffs who brought the case against the u.s. government now u.s. officials have for many years asked americans to sacrifice some of their privacy in the name of security but so far no top u.s. official can mention any danger imminent danger that's been thwarted through the collection of everyone's personal information now the secret status of the documents which exposed vienna's surveillance played a key role in this ruling daniel mcadams is an executive director of the wrong ball institute for peace and prosperity he told r t why he thinks the wording of the verdict could be a cause for major concern. this ruling by judge of holy it on friday said that the a.c.l.u. doesn't have the right to challenge this collection of metadata because that was it was gotten illegally because of the revelations by snowden because congress meant for section two fifteen of the patriot act to be secret orders under that sentient to be secret

ok a federal judge has ruled that the national security agency's bulk mehta data collection program the one revealed by edward snowden back in june is probably unconstitutional this record judge richard leon said in a ruling released monday that the n.s.a. is dragnet surveillance likely violates the fourth amendment ban on unreasonable search and seizure he said that he could not imagine a more indiscriminate arbitrary invasion and the systemic and high tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes aquarian analyze it without judicial approval. and to boil it down he actually used the word or so this is all well and so do we go with this this is a great judge read she's a frame you become makes a strange decision and he becomes famous magnificent piece of entrepreneurs who are sure that once again time if he's a real problem much of our life is moving online and if we were to keep records of it somebody has to keep records if we do not want the i.r.s. or the democratic party doing it and so we want all these special corps of people with sh

of course internet, telephone trans missions, what became known as mehta data and in the wake of it all the president while at the same time swearing that the law was beinged a hered to said he was open to looking at new ways, new techniques to approach the problem. the white house spokesman, here is what he had to say. part of the process that the president has asked for is one that will allow us to be as transparent as possible and as he said propose some self-restraint on the nsa and initiate some reforms that can give people some confidence in giving more confidence and giving more information. >> now, dribs and drabs of the draft port that is being sent to the white house, the white house will look it over. there could be significant changes made after it is reviewed by the intelligence community including the national security agency. but what we are learning from the "new york times" and elsewhere is that there are more provisions to protect the privacy of foreigners overseas. remember the restrictions chiefly about gathering this intelligence and telephone communications as well

bill: a federal judge saying a program to collect your mehta ma is likely unconstitutional. michael mukasey, first meta data is? >> the number that does the calling, the date of the call and the length of the call. it's nothing about the contents of the call or the identity of the person making the call. bill: not my address or the context of the conversation, no key words searched for? >> no words at all, key or otherwise. i have got to tell you richard leon is a fine judge and terrific person. but even great judges and terrific people occasionally make mistakes and he made a mistake. bill: he stayed the order giving the government the chance to appeal. >> that's the responsible thing for a judge to do and that's what he did. bill: he said i cannot imagine a more indiscriminate and arbitrary collection of data or every american citizen without prior judicious approval. such a program infringes on that degree of privacy of the founder enshrined in the fourth amendment. >> i think the mistake that he made was in analyzing what the government could do fit abused the program ra

recommendations but maybe come out and say that he's going to allow private companies to hold the mehtaof the changes that's been talked about quite a lot. then issues behind the scenes. syria, that is a big one. >> yes. >> of course there has been progress towards getting rid of their chemical weapons program, but you still have so many people being killed every day at the hands of the assad regime. that is one that is going to continue to be at the back burner. then of course iran. you have that nuclear deal that a lot of folks in congress aren't happy about, and they want to see sanctions put in place. the white house says that would be a bad idea. that's going to be a little battle we'll see as well. >> the 2014 question on syria will be interesting. i think the president was incredibly deft politically in how he managed to walk that syria piece. it was very difficult. we saw his political capacity in that moment. it will be interesting to see what happens to the american public and whether or not we care that people are dying in syria, which we know can be difficult. stay with me.