the spring and melanie sloane, who is a former federal prosecutor. so you're currently an attorney with special expertise in government ethics. thank you so much for joining us. we'll get to the ethics part of this. i can't wait a little later. let's start with the legal part. donald trump is a powerful man, president of united states. he can set policy, he can dictate terms on many things he can make promises. he can even sign executive orders as he has done dozens of them. but it's still not legal. ultimately, it's not going to work. and that was kind of the lesson from the 1st term, many of the things he wanted to do, more legal. what do you see in this space at this moment? well, he makes a lot of promises that many of his supporters want to see immigration, obviously one of his best issues. so he's immediately come in and said he's ending birth right citizenship only he can actually do that because it's part of the us constitution. so we immediately, what has happened? is there been several lawsuits already filed, one by 18. state attorneys gene

as melanie sloane is a former federal prosecutor who is currently an attorney with an expertise and government ethics, she told my colleagues several vanya, that donald trump may size legal road blocks, implementing some of his executive orders. he makes a lot of promises that many of his supporters want to see immigration, obviously one of his best issues. so he's immediately come in and said he's ending birth right citizenship only. he can actually do that because it's part of by the us constitution. so we immediately, what has happened? is there been several lawsuits already filed, one by 18. state attorneys general filed up in massachusetts, and 18 states are suing donald trump. 24 i was addressed so far. i mean that that's yeah that's, that's more we'll join it. but that last year, it is likely to lead to a nationwide in junction stopping trump from trying to enforce this new van on from, on a birth right citizenship also with the issue of the border. he wants to be able to use us troops to, um, add to secure that. are there definitely some legal questions that will come up with that? uh,