, they didn’t give amel, they did, well, that means a controversial issue, that is, in my opinion, meldoaction, but he did not understand what he found there, if you read his original works. it was as if he did not realize the importance of this process, here, and sharpes fokin, they realized this importance. that's why it seems to me that it would be more appropriate to give fokine. i am i don’t know what the decision of the nobel committee was dictated by, but hmm, it’s possible, the fact is that it’s just that sharpe from fokine from one kind of group, uh, meldel, was separate from them, so it means to give, as it were, to the same group two. well, as if two laureates, considering that the scarf from receives this award for the second time. this in itself is a completely unique event. here, apparently, the nobel committee believed that this was too much, that is, about this question about whether lego constructor or not lego is such a lego constructor with only two elements that are hooked, and your task, those who want to use it, is to sew these attachments to something else. very ho