no supervisor randleman mandolin and i supervisor melgar melgar i supervisor peskin peskin i supervisor preston preston i and supervisor ronan ronan i there are seven eyes and four nose with supervisor sapphire stephanie dorsey and in guardian voting no, the motions are are approved. madam clerk, i believe that items. 42 through 45 are no longer before us. yes mr. president. we will state in the minutes tabled by operation of law. okay. could you please read items 46 through 49 together? items 46 through 49 comprise the second special order for a public hearing of persons interested in the approval of a conditional use authorization for a proposed project at 3832 18th street to allow approval of an individually requested state density bonus project and to invoke waivers from the development standards for the rear yard dwelling unit exposure in the height limit that would construct a new six story 60 foot tall residential building with 19 group housing units within the rm one zoning district and a 40 dash x height and bulk district. item 47 is the motion to approve the decision of the pl

no supervisor randleman mandolin and i supervisor melgar melgar i supervisor peskin peskin i supervisor preston preston i and supervisor ronan ronan i there are seven eyes and four nose with supervisor sapphire stephanie dorsey and in guardian voting no, the motions are are approved. madam clerk, i believe that items. 42 through 45 are no longer before us. yes mr. president. we will state in the minutes tabled by operation of law. okay. could you please read items 46 through 49 together? items 46 through 49 comprise the second special order for a public hearing of persons interested in the approval of a conditional use authorization for a proposed project at 3832 18th street to allow approval of an individually requested state density bonus project and to invoke waivers from the development standards for the rear yard dwelling unit exposure in the height limit that would construct a new six story 60 foot tall residential building with 19 group housing units within the rm one zoning district and a 40 dash x height and bulk district. item 47 is the motion to approve the decision of the pl

dorsey i supervisor and cardio and cardio i supervisor man delman handelman supervisor melgar. melgar eyes supervisor peskin. i and supervisor preston preston, either or 11 eyes. those ordinances are passed on first reading and resolutions adopted. madam clerk, would you please read items 21 through 29 2 items 21 through 29 are nine ordinances that adopt and implement various mou s the memorandum of understanding between the city and the following unions items 21 and 20 to adopt the mou for the firefighters. local 7 98 i a f f a f l c i o item. 21 is for unit one and item. 22 is for unit two to be effective july 1st 2023 through june 30th 2026 item 23 is the mou that adopts, uh, the municipal executives association for fire through june 30th 2026 item 24 fixes compensation for unrepresented employees and establishes working schedules and other terms and conditions of employment and methods of payment, effective july 1st 2023 item 25 adopts the mou the second amendment to the mou for the service employees international union, local 10 21 and adopts a side letter agreement item. 26 adop

melgar. melgar i supervisor peskin. no skin no. and supervisor preston. preston i. there are eight eyes and three nose with supervisors ronan walton and peskin voting. no. the ordinance is finally passed. next item item. 33 this is an ordinance amending the police code to provide that cannabis retail permit applications will not be accepted by the office of cannabis during the period between the effective date of this ordinance in december, 31st 2027 roll call item. 33 supervisor ronan run an eye supervisor self i e. so far, he i supervisor stephany. stephanie i supervisor walton. walton i supervisor chan. chan i supervisor dorsey. dorsey i supervisor and cardio. and cardio i supervisor mandel man. mandel men i supervisor melgar melgaard. i supervisor peskin. i can i and supervisor preston preston, either lebanese. the ordinances finally passed. next item, please item 34. this is an ordinance to amend the health code to designate the city attorney to represent the city in certain conservatorship proceedings. same house. same call. the ordinance is finally passed. next item. item 35. this is a resolution to approve the professional services agreement. contract number of 50337 for a five year term through june. 30th 2028 for approximately 215 million for the management and operations of airport, public and employee parking facilities between sp plus sf joint venture and the city. same house. same call. the resolution is adopted. next item, please 36. this is a resolution to approve the settlement of the unlit, a gated claim filed by 12 31 market street. the owner lp against the city and county of san francisco for 19.5 million. this claim involves allegations of property damage to the hotel whitcomb, uh , cause

melgar. melgar i supervisor peskin. no skin no. and supervisor preston. preston i. there are eight eyes and three nose with supervisors ronan walton and peskin voting. no. the ordinance is finally passed. next item item. 33 this is an ordinance amending the police code to provide that cannabis retail permit applications will not be accepted by the office of cannabis during the period between the effective date of this ordinance in december, 31st 2027 roll call item. 33 supervisor ronan run an eye supervisor self i e. so far, he i supervisor stephany. stephanie i supervisor walton. walton i supervisor chan. chan i supervisor dorsey. dorsey i supervisor and cardio. and cardio i supervisor mandel man. mandel men i supervisor melgar melgaard. i supervisor peskin. i can i and supervisor preston preston, either lebanese. the ordinances finally passed. next item, please item 34. this is an ordinance to amend the health code to designate the city attorney to represent the city in certain conservatorship proceedings. same house. same call. the ordinance is finally passed. next item. item 35. this is a resolution to approve the professional services agreement. contract number of 50337 for a five year term through june. 30th 2028 for approximately 215 million for the management and operations of airport, public and employee parking facilities between sp plus sf joint venture and the city. same house. same call. the resolution is adopted. next item, please 36. this is a resolution to approve the settlement of the unlit, a gated claim filed by 12 31 market street. the owner lp against the city and county of san francisco for 19.5 million. this claim involves allegations of property damage to the hotel whitcomb, uh , cause

melgar. melgar i supervisor peskin. no skin no. and supervisor preston. preston i. there are eight eyes and three nose with supervisors ronan walton and peskin voting. no. the ordinance is finally passed. next item item. 33 this is an ordinance amending the police code to provide that cannabis retail permit applications will not be accepted by the office of cannabis during the period between the effective date of this ordinance in december, 31st 2027 roll call item. 33 supervisor ronan run an eye supervisor self i e. so far, he i supervisor stephany. stephanie i supervisor walton. walton i supervisor chan. chan i supervisor dorsey. dorsey i supervisor and cardio. and cardio i supervisor mandel man. mandel men i supervisor melgarrvatorship proceedings. same house. same call. the ordinance is finally passed. next item. item 35. this is a resolution to approve the professional services agreement. contract number of 50337 for a five year term through june. 30th 2028 for approximately 215 million for the management and operations of airport, public and employee parking facilities between sp plus sf joint venture and the city. same house. same call. the resolution is adopted. next item, please 36. this is a resolution to approve the settlement of the unlit, a gated claim filed by 12 31 market street. the owner lp against the city and county of san francisco for 19.5 million. this claim involves allegations of property damage to the hotel whitcomb, uh , caused during covid 19 pandemic and the resulting loss of use. same house, same called the resolution is adopted. next item item 37. this is emotion, responding to the civil grand juries request to provide a status update on the board of supervisors, response to vari

supervisor dorsey dorsey i supervisor and gaudio and gaudio absent supervisor mandel and i supervisor melgar i melgar i supervisor peskin and peskin i supervisor preston preston i and supervisor ronan ronan i and there are ten eyes those resolution are adopted in motion approved. madam clerk, could you please read the immemorial today's meeting will be adjourned in memory of the following beloved individuals on behalf of supervisor safai for the late miss sharon thomas, on behalf of president peskin for the late miss judith schiff, mr. patrick arbor. mr. carlos rico moreno and mr. robert costanzo. we are adjourned. >> long it was in fashion, o'shaughnessy water system has been sustainable. in addition to providing water for the bay area, it also generates clean hydroelectric power to run city buildings and services. and more recently, some san francisco homes and businesses. >> satellite electricity is greenhouse gas free, so we see a tremendous benefit from that. we really are proud of the fact that, we've put our water to work. >> even with the system as well coon received as hetch hetchy, climate

melgar. melgar eyes supervisor peskin. i can i and supervisor preston, no , no, there are nine eyes and to nose with supervisors. walton and preston voting no. the ordinances are passed on first reading next item, please. the following items item. 50 was considered by the land use and transportation committee at a regular meeting on monday, june 12th and was forwarded to the board as a committee report with the same title item. 50 is an ordinance to amend the planning code pertaining to commercial two residential adaptive reuse in downtown economic revitalization. roll call. an item 50 supervisor ronin. ronin i supervisor safi g. so far, he i supervisor stephany. stephanie i supervisor. walton walton. eyes supervisor chan chennai supervisor dorsey dorothy i supervisor and cardio. and cardio i supervisor mandel hman. gentlemen. i supervisor melchor. melgar eyes supervisor peskin. i can i and supervisor preston preston, i. there are lebanese. the ordinance is passed on first reading madam park. let's go to roll call for introductions. supervisor ronan your first have to introduce new business. thank you. colleagues i don't have any items today, but i just wanted to make a brief statement about a mass shooting on friday evening that took place in the mission district. nine people were transported to local hospitals and, thankfully and then through some amazing miracle. all nine victims survived. i want to offer my deep and heartfelt gratitude to our first responders who arrived at the scene immediately. i think the police was within two minutes. the fire department and ambulance is within four minutes . uh and they really, uh, triaged and administered expert care leading to no casualties. um well, this particular incident was targeted, isolated as our colleague catherine stephanie always reminds us this incident is a reflection of what is

melgar. i melgar i supervisor. peskin peskin i supervisor preston preston i and supervisor ronen ronen i there are ten eyes all right. the motions are approved. madam clerk, why don't we go back to roll call for introductions where i believe supervisor stephanie had just concluded? yes. and supervisor walton is up next to introduce new business. thank you, madam clerk. first of all, just want to give some. brief updates on. outside boards as far as our workforce investment board in their staff presented their fiscal year 2023 funding recommendations, focusing on on demand industries and equitable pathways for residents. the recommendations received positive feedback from wusf members and the public, and they were approved. as you know, earlier, we had an update from caltrans. but i do just want to state for the record that we shared some updates. this morning, but briefly. on july 29th, there will be an event for the public to view the electric trains for the first time at san jose dearden station and likely in early september, another event for the public at fourth and kings station in the summer of caltrain program is currently happening, which is a three month promotion for rider appreciation and promoting ridership this summer, including rolling back june's planned fare increase for another six months overall, ridership is still very far below pre-pandemic. levels, but continues to make steady increase. especially for sporting events. and as far as the bay area, air quality management district and may, the air district released its 2022 annual report, which covers the ongoing work to address disparities in air quality and the new challenges posed by climate change. the report highlights expanding partnerships and environmental justice communities and increased regulatory controls on the industry climate programs to accelerate electrification and greenhouse gas reductions. and the air district is continuing to. work on equity to ensure that. everyone can breathe clean air by addressing environmental burdens and health disparities. and historically most vulnerable communities and populations. lastly, colleagues, today i have introduction of a resolution supporting assembly constitutional amendment for also known as aquifer, which will give california voters the opportunity to decide whether to restore voting to incarcerated people completing their prison sentence. i'd like to thank my early co-sponsors supervisor ronan. president peskin. supervisors melgar preston. chan and gaudio. voting is not a privilege. it is a fundamental right of citizenship that people in prison do not lose their citizen rights, citizenship rights and disenfranchize of people in prison. disenfranchisement of people in prison, including california, dates back to the era of racially discriminatory jim crow laws and was written in our constitution. black people make up 6% of california's population , but account for approximately 30% of the state's prison population. aquifer itself is. simple. it will remove the prohibited. against people in prison voting that exists in the state constitution. if it passes, we will join states like vermont, maine, the area known as washington, dc, and puerto rico, and restoring voting rights for incarcerated people. thank you. and we understand that the right to vote is a right and everyone should be supportive of this. and i look forward to moving this forward. thank you. i submit thank you. supervisor walton, super. advisor chen.

melgar. i'm joined by president aaron peskin and supervisor matt dorsey. who is filling in for our chair melgar. the clerk today is erika major example we want to thank sfgovtv for staffing this meeting. >> public comment will be taken on each item. those in personal speak first and then move to the remote line. when connected you will hear the discussion but mute exclude in listening mode only. when your item come up and public comment is called those in person should lineup and those on the phone should dial star 3 to be acided to the queue. if you are on your phone remember to turn down your television and listening device. you may also submit written comments in the following ways e mail myself the land use and transportation clerk at erika. major sfgov.org >> and you may also send comments u.s. postal service at city hall. the address is 1 dr. carlton b. goodlett place room 244, san francisco, california. items today will appear on the poored of supervisor's agenda of june 6. mr. vice chair? vehicle, madam clerk. before the first item i like to make a motion to excuse supervisor melgar >> on this motion member dorsey. >> aye >> member peskin. >> aye. >> and supervisor preston. >> aye. >> you have 3 aye's >> thank you that motion passes and call item one. >> item 1 an ordinance amending planning code to allow use of shared spaces and specific public parking lots in mission street commercial transit district without abandonment of the under loyaling vehicle lawyer parking lease and affirming appropriate findings. member who is would like to speak need to press star 3 you will hear the system indicate you raised your hand. >> today we will be hearing from miss herrera aired for supervisor robe sxen mr. starr from planning department. wvenlg >> welcome. thwacking chair and supervisors this is very narrow and will clarify this in the mission neighborhood/commercial transit district if a portion of a public parking let use lights as shared spaces tell not be abandon. it is for one loved business to continue it separate their shared spaces patio. owner of the parking lot a

melgar. >> aye. >> chair melgar. why you have 3 aye's >> that motion passes. why i would like to duplicate the file as amended. and add the language am at page 40 to include portions of the c2 zoning district for the existing signage provisions. and -- make the other changes that mr. bentlive wanted regarding off street freight load and curb cuts for vehicle lawyer access that are set forth in the long title -- as well as increasing the threshold for large projects subject to commercial, residential, in the c30. and i'd like to make those changes to the duplicated file and then move to continue the duplicated foil to the call the chair and sends original file as amended to the full board with recommendation as a committee report. >> wow. >> okay. >> okay. [laughter]. so on the motion to amend the duplicated file to add the amendments as read in the record and continue this file to the call the chair while forwarding the originally amended file to the full board with a positive recommendation. as a committee report. thank you. >> vice chair preston. >> aye. >> member supervisor peskin. >> aye. >> chair melgar. >> aye. >> you have 3 aye's. >> thank you that motion passes. okay now we go to item number 4. so. thank you, thank you deputy city attorney jensen. the word business with a capital b on page 4 at line 16. not with standing any other provisions of this code. awning or business sign. existing on the effective date. so we are adding the word, business sign. long with my other nonsubstantive amendments made designating significant or contribute. all comply with prosecute visions of article 6 and a state licensed condition tractor or engineer a previously discussed those are all nonsubstantive and unless mr. don't. >> i'm sorry it is we took a vote on this item this statute further amendment to that. >> yes. >> one further amendment to the original file. to say, or business sign existing on the effective date. only the -- inclusion of the word, business. at line 16 page 4. >> were i'm going to say something. the amendments i saw that were circulated for this am item. had proposeed add la

melgar i melgar i commissioner peskin i peskin i commissioner preston preston i commissioner ronen running i commissioner safire stuff i absent commissioner stephanie stephanie i the motion is approved or excuse me the minutes are approved. great thank you. mr. clerk, please call our consent agenda items five through nine items five through nine comprise the consent agenda staff is not planning to present on these items, but is available for questions. we have. we have received a written public comment on item six, seven, eight and nine. great. thank you. is there a motion to approve the consent agenda moved by melgar? is there a second seconded by dorsey? i think we can take that same house, same call without objection. and mr. clerk, please call our next item item ten final approval on first appearance. adopt the proposed fiscal year 2023 2024 budget and work program. this is an action item. okay. item ten is also a public hearing on the proposed fiscal year 20 2324 annual budget and work program, which will be open to board discussion. public comment. following a brief update by lily. you our principal management analyst who's here to present the item. miss you. good morning, chair and commissioners lily yu, principal management analyst. that item i am presenting today is to recommend adoption of the proposed annual budget and work program for fiscal year 2023 2024, which begins on page 245 of the board packet last month. executive director chang and i present the preliminary fiscal year 2024 budget and work program as an information item. and since then we've incorporated the budget related to

melgar i melgar i commissioner peskin i peskin i commissioner preston preston i commissioner ronen running i commissioner safire stuff i absent commissioner stephanie stephanie i the motion is approved or excuse me the minutes are approved. great thank you. mr. clerk, please call our consent agenda items five through nine items five through nine comprise the consent agenda staff is not planning to present on these items, but is available for questions. we have. we have received a written public comment on item six, seven, eight and nine. great. thank you. is there a motion to approve the consent agenda moved by melgar? is there a second seconded by dorsey? i think we can take that same house, same call without objection. and mr. clerk, please call our next item item ten final approval on first appearance. adopt the proposed fiscal year 2023 2024 budget and work program. this is an action item. okay. item ten is also a public hearing on the proposed fiscal year 20 2324 annual budget and work program, which will be open to board discussion. public comment. following a brief update by lily. you our principal management analyst who's here to present the item. miss you. good morning, chair and commissioners lily yu, principal management analyst. that item i am presenting today is to recommend adoption of the proposed annual budget and work program for fiscal year 2023 2024, which begins on page 245 of the board packet last month. executive director chang and i present the preliminary fiscal year 2024 budget and work program as an information item. and since then we've incorporated the budget related to

melgar. i want to thank jason from sfgovtv, our clerk today is elijia seaneders. >> commissioner chan. >> ash cent >> commissioner dorsey. >> present wrchl commissioner engardio. present. >> commissioner mandelman. >> present. >> melgar. >> present >> supervisor peskin. where present. >> preston. >> present. >> commissioner ronen. >> present. commissioner stefani. >> absent >> commissioner walton. >> present. >> we have a quorum. >> and i would like to excuse commissioner stefani from today's meet and youing have a public comment announcement? >> i do. for members interested in participates in the meeting we welcome you in person in the chamber room 250 or wash channel 26 or 99 or live at sfgov.org. for those wish to comment remote low dial 415-554-0001. access code: 2597 197 8021 ##. pregsz star 3 to enter the queue. do not press it again or you will be removed from the queue. when the system says, your line is unmuted the operator will advise you will you be able to speak. the best practices to speak slowly. clearly and turn down televisions or radios. public comments will be taken first from those in attendance and after prosecute from the remote line. thank you. >> before calling i want to invoke 3.26 from rules of order to limit comment for 30 minutes for today's meeting my intention to give each speaker 2 minutes. mr. clerk. call our next item. >> item 2 approve the minutes of may 23rd meeting. open to public comment. >> see if we are remote ebb comment on the minutes. remote comment on item 2? and there is no public comment. >> all right. public comment is closed. is there a motion to approve item 2? moved by melgar. seconded by ronen. thank you, colleagues, mr. clerk call the roll. >> commissioner chan. >> absent. >> commissioner dorsey. >> aye. >> commissioner engardio. >> aye yoochl chair mandelman. >> aye. >> melgar. >> aye. >> commissioner peskin. >> aye >> commissioner preston. >> aye. >> commissioner ronen. >> aye. >> safai. >> absent >> commissioner walton. >> aye. we have 8 aye's and the minutes are arule of lawed. >> thank you. call the next item >> item 3 community advisory committee report an informational item. i think we have our cac vice chair. >> good morning we had a bipartisaning agenda on may 24th. there was a lot of discussion on ocean and octavia action plans with the theme of discussion being that both contain alost great recommendations cac members would like to see them go further. several members d7 supportive of the ocean avenue plan expressed disappointment the bike afordances don't include protected bike infrastructure. and wanted see additional traffic calming on ocea

melgar. >> aye. >> chair melgar. why you have 3 aye's >> that motion passes. why i would like to duplicate the file as amended. and add the language am at page 40 to include portions of the c2 zoning district for the existing signage provisions. and -- make the other changes that mr. bentlive wanted regarding off street freight load and curb cuts for vehicle lawyer access that are set forth in the long title -- as well as increasing the threshold for large projects subject to commercial, residential, in the c30. and i'd like to make those changes to the duplicated file and then move to continue the duplicated foil to the call the chair and sends original file as amended to the full board with recommendation as a committee report. >> wow. >> okay. >> okay. [laughter]. so on the motion to amend the duplicated file to add the amendments as read in the record and continue this file to the call the chair while forwarding the originally amended file to the full board with a positive recommendation. as a committee report. thank you. >> vice chair preston. >> aye. >> member supervisor peskin. >> aye. >> chair melgar. >> aye. >> you have 3 aye's. >> thank you that motion passes. okay now we go to item number 4. so. thank you, thank you deputy city attorney jensen. the word business with a capital b on page 4 at line 16. not with standing any other provisions of this code. awning or business sign. existing on the effective date. so we are adding the word, business sign. long with my other nonsubstantive amendments made designating significant or contribute. all comply with prosecute visions of article 6 and a state licensed condition tractor or engineer a previously discussed those are all nonsubstantive and unless mr. don't. >> i'm sorry it is we took a vote on this item this statute further amendment to that. >> yes. >> one further amendment to the original file. to say, or business sign existing on the effective date. only the -- inclusion of the word, business. at line 16 page 4. >> were i'm going to say something. the amendments i saw that were circulated for this am item. had proposeed add la

melgar. i want to thank jason from sfgovtv, our clerk today is elijia seaneders. >> commissioner chan. >> ash cent >> commissioner dorsey. >> present wrchl commissioner engardio. present. >> commissioner mandelman. >> present. >> melgar. >> present >> supervisor peskin. where present. >> preston. >> present. >> commissioner ronen. >> present. commissioner stefani. >> absent >> commissioner walton. >> present. >> we have a quorum. >> and i would like to excuse commissioner stefani from today's meet and youing have a public comment announcement? >> i do. for members interested in participates in the meeting we welcome you in person in the chamber room 250 or wash channel 26 or 99 or live at sfgov.org. for those wish to comment remote low dial 415-554-0001. access code: 2597 197 8021 ##. pregsz star 3 to enter the queue. do not press it again or you will be removed from the queue. when the system says, your line is unmuted the operator will advise you will you be able to speak. the best practices to speak slowly. clearly and turn down televisions or radios. public comments will be taken first from those in attendance and after prosecute from the remote line. thank you. >> before calling i want to invoke 3.26 from rules of order to limit comment for 30 minutes for today's meeting my intention to give each speaker 2 minutes. mr. clerk. call our next item. >> item 2 approve the minutes of may 23rd meeting. open to public comment. >> see if we are remote ebb comment on the minutes. remote comment on item 2? and there is no public comment. >> all right. public comment is closed. is there a motion to approve item 2? moved by melgar. seconded by ronen. thank you, colleagues, mr. clerk call the roll. >> commissioner chan. >> absent. >> commissioner dorsey. >> aye. >> commissioner engardio. >> aye yoochl chair mandelman. >> aye. >> melgar. >> aye. >> commissioner peskin. >> aye >> commissioner preston. >> aye. >> commissioner ronen. >> aye. >> safai. >> absent >> commissioner walton. >> aye. we have 8 aye's and the minutes are arule of lawed. >> thank you. call the next item >> item 3 community advisory committee report an informational item. i think we have our cac vice chair. >> good morning we had a bipartisaning agenda on may 24th. there was a lot of discussion on ocean and octavia action plans with the theme of discussion being that both contain alost great recommendations cac members would like to see them go further. several members d7 supportive of the ocean avenue plan expressed disappointment the bike afordances don't include protected bike infrastructure. and wanted see additional traffic calming on ocea

melgar. i want to thank jason from sfgovtv, our clerk today is elijia seaneders. >> commissioner chan. >> ash cent >> commissioner dorsey. >> present wrchl commissioner engardio. present. >> commissioner mandelman. >> present. >> melgar. >> present >> supervisor peskin. where present. >> preston. >> present. >> commissioner ronen. >> present. commissioner stefani. >> absent >> commissioner walton. >> present. >> we have a quorum. >> and i would like to excuse commissioner stefani from today's meet and youing have a public comment announcement? >> i do. for members interested in participates in the meeting we welcome you in person in the chamber room 250 or wash channel 26 or 99 or live at sfgov.org. for those wish to comment remote low dial 415-554-0001. access code: 2597 197 8021 ##. pregsz star 3 to enter the queue. do not press it again or you will be removed from the queue. when the system says, your line is unmuted the operator will advise you will you be able to speak. the best practices to speak slowly. clearly and turn down televisions or radios. public comments will be taken first from those in attendance and after prosecute from the remote line. thank you. >> before calling i want to invoke 3.26 from rules of order to limit comment for 30 minutes for today's meeting my intention to give each speaker 2 minutes. mr. clerk. call our next item. >> item 2 approve the minutes of may 23rd meeting. open to public comment. >> see if we are remote ebb comment on the minutes. remote comment on item 2? and there is no public comment. >> all right. public comment is closed. is there a motion to approve item 2? moved by melgar. seconded by ronen. thank you, colleagues, mr. clerk call the roll. >> commissioner chan. >> absent. >> commissioner dorsey. >> aye. >> commissioner engardio. >> aye yoochl chair mandelman. >> aye. >> melgar. >> aye. >> commissioner peskin. >> aye >> commissioner preston. >> aye. >> commissioner ronen. >> aye. >> safai. >> absent >> commissioner walton. >> aye. we have 8 aye's and the minutes are arule of lawed. >> thank you. call the next item >> item 3 community advisory committee report an informational item. i think we have our cac vice chair. >> good morning we had a bipartisaning agenda on may 24th. there was a lot of discussion on ocean and octavia action plans with the theme of discussion being that both contain alost great recommendations cac members would like to see them go further. several members d7 supportive of the ocean avenue plan expressed disappointment the bike afordances don't include protected bike infrastructure. and wanted see additional traffic calming on ocea

melgar second this? mr. clerk call the roll on item 6. commissioner chan. >> aye. >> commissioner dorsey. >> aye. >> commissioner engardio. >> aye >> chair mandelman. why aye. >> melgar. >> aye. >> commissioner preston. >> aye. >> commissioner ronen. >> aye. >> commissioner safai. >> aye. >> commissioner walton. >> aye. >> we have 8 and it is approved. thank you, mr. clerk item 7ch >> item 7 adopt the prop well<,> strategic plan baseline this is action item >> this is exciting and we have and ana our deputy direct for policy and planning. and amilia wally our program analyst. >> great. thank you. so nice to hear someone call this exciting. >> very. >> [laughter]. i'm anna, nice to be here. with you all this morning and amillia will be copresenting this for you. them is the first of 2 prop l action items on your beyondch agenda today it was approve in the november and will sales tax measure on april first. now we are work on the new measure. the expenditure plan had 5 big buckets of programs within temperature such as transit project and paratransit and within the bikts are 28 programs and each those programs requires a 5 year prioritization program. in order to guide the implementation of the measure over the next 5 years. prop l plan told us the big program and how much money each has. who can apply and when is eligible and requires that the board adopt a strategic plan and 5 year prioritization program essential low a project list as a prerequisite for allocating upon funds the strategic plan is made up of 3 main elements. policy wills are ref now and expend tours. it supports delivery of the measure. it wouns have status in the strategic plan as a programmed status the funds are visible for allocation when they are red. give agencies certainty when they can count on from prop l to leverage grantsor projects red and to just get going on work. strategic complnlt 5ypp work together. they are developed the same time. the strategic plan is a 30 year period 5ypp are 5 years. the process for under taking now is to develop the 5ytp for the first 5 year and repeat every 5 years. and doing a look ahead for the next 5 years of the projects will advancing during that time. during the next update, which in 2028 we would do that. i'm not going deep in the 5ypp's my pick will be addressing those in the next item on your agenda. the strategic plan and the 5ypp they worked together so we are now in step 1. each the 28 programs by fiscal through 2053. that's the baseline for most of the categories. i will goat that. in step 2 identified projects to be funds the next 5 years and work with the community advisory committee and the public engagement and the board and project experiences to identify and identify the projects to be funded witness they are to so lidifiy we analyze financial information. how much sales tax and the levering sufficient? does everything make sense? reasonable requests? and this includes requests for from sponsors to accelerate or advance sales tax funds. has to fit within this budget for the program. we put that information in our plan financial model estimates financing costs for the programs advancing funds and prosecute have aed that information to sponsors and ultimately when everybodying jells we have a 5 year board 5ypp's the first is next mont and we will have a final plan adoption the end of the calendar year. good morning thank you for this context. the strategic plan baseline with the 3 components. first is the strategic plan policy. they provide guidance on the administration of the program. prop well<,> based on prop circumstance. and reflect the giegd principles on the slide well is a requirement which is prop l staff develop project delivery guidelines. keep anticipate bring thanksgiving to the board the end of the calendar year. the new projection in the late data take into account the actual revenue of the last 2 face cal years and [speak fast]. and the foible component is the expenditures. i will highlight a few but you can find more in your packet about them. the first is the operating cost and program administration. these are set ref now and tape are off the end of the program. we are carrying 7.9, consistent with prior years under prop k. everything left for project expenses i'm sorry. left after netting them out is project expenses and financing. >> and the lost 1.57 years of revenue actual ref nows are low and helps to ensure we have funds to cover obligations. [reading very fast]. >> and because prop l has supercede prop k we have carry forward obligations with prop k. existing debt from 2017 bonds 21 million dollars a year through fiscal 34 and 400 million dollars in remaining grant balances from about 400 open grants. during the prop well<,> plan develop the we assumed the prop circumstance carry forward 550 million dollars. it was a good estimate the existing grants revenue carried over to pay. the next shows this criminalitied to high demand for ref nows in the first few years of the prop well<,> program. a graph showing carbreimburse am for prospect circumstance. majority in the first 2 years levels [inaudible] context fiscal 23 expecting 112 million dollars in revenues. we see our fiscal 23 will be less than the approved max. we updated the moss to refect the reimbursement and match the agency budget 120 million dollars in fiscal 23. we left 24 to match the 24 budget and shifted the [inaudible] from 23 to fiscal 26. moving them out is more realistic based on importance and helps us to reduce dent costs. >> now get to prop well<,> and the baseline. 23 of the 28 programs the baseline says the share of funds available on a pay as you go bases and through the press this micheal talked about shortly sponsors request acceleration to upon support deliverability faster and a share of finance costs within the funding cap. this policy is carry forward from prop circumstance and protects the mall are on going programs [inaudible] resulting from projects to advance funds. >> for the other 5 of the 28 programs proposing to accel rit funds in the base line boy 2 big projects. thank you. >> thank you. all right. so the 5 programs in the baseline we are recommending advancing funds for our the downtown extension the portal has 300 million dollars commitment of sales tax funds dem trito the transit'd registration to have a mull mission federal grant that needs to help this sumtory meet a mile stone. and also part of the [inaudible] bart seek to advance fundses to exercise an option for rail cars. and this is to look in a lower process and working with bart exteriorings to nail down timing of the when the funds are needed. to give a picture of financing costs for those 2 programs or protects who i ensuring we meet other programs requests for advancing funds we are accelerating the baseline for 3 other large programs this we know are seeking to advance. and together these are among the largest in the prop l. with respect to maintenance this is the vehicle facility and guide ways program. the lfrjest in prop l. it has not outside impact on financing costs. we moss the accomplice holder we are working with mta to get information on the projectsless. and that we will be doing that throughout manslaughter 5ypp process. and the program 5 milling annually for san francisco contributionical trin capitol maintenance. so, the assumptions so we have a combination of front load carry forward. grant balance and 2017 bond. 5 major prop well<,> promise with proposed advance am of funds. credits a cash challenge in the first 5 to 10 years with project needs for this program exceeding revenues. this leads to the need to issue debt in the model. we included a number of assumptions to seek to minimize debt costs and fair distribution of debt with prop k and prop well<,>. as we did with prop circumstance we are on the side of conservative consumptions for debt issuance. actual devenlt, when issued if lower, which is hen in the pastment gets reflect instead next plan and you want delta goes become to projects. our prop to debt issuance enabled you to maintain a top credit rating of aaa through the pandemic this served us very well. almost to the last slide. this table provides a snapshot of the model out put. table will change when we have project programming and cash flows. proposed for the first 5 years. i will quickly walk you through. the source the ref now including a bond proceed. the loans we make on behalf of tida. like west side bridge in advance of getting repaved by funds those are loans to repay the program and keep it whole and uses side we have available projects the funds available for projects reflect the pay go and long-term principle reflects finance costs and 5 promise. everything else i talked about. this is the proposed action. buffer today to adopt baselineful and we appreciate all the partners efforts to date and look forward to working together over the summer. and the fall to develop the five year project lists. thank you. voice chair melgar? >> thank you this was very thorough and straightforward. it is amazing work. thank you. i do have a question. it is is more toward -- director chan? [laughter] thank you. so i'm grateful that prop well<,> passed and all the good work that chair mandelman did. a lot is changing in our city and region. we are dealing with the climate crisis. and our need to reduce carbon e missions. we are dealing with a housing element that we approved that you know evolved denseification of the west side which is poorly served by transit. to when extent are we plan with other funding agencies? there is stuff we talked about like, you know the way the a way to have a seamless payment system. across different transit agencies. what extent are we doing that long-term planning you know financial low but also you know. worrying financing agencies. thank you for the question the back determine to the programming work for prop well<,> budget for the next 5 years has been the context of plan bay area and our

melgar for working with advocates on this. i read the supervisor, melgar sorry amendments and it's perfect. brilliant. and just just want to appreciate you both. thank you so much for your work on this. thank you. and supervisor malka . thank you. chair chan and colleagues, i really just first of all, want to thank all the early care providers and the families who have been in this process and sort of woken up to our political process. it has been an amazing thing to watch. so i want to say thank you so much. i am here to implore the committee not to pass item number 11. so i just want to tell you a little bit just personally years ago, i was offered a job by the then mayor , gavin newsom, because i had just come back into town after having been in graduate school on the east coast. and my little my girls were little. i was also offered three other jobs at the same time. and i took this job because i found childcare after school, childcare nearby, within a block of where of one south, which is where the office was. and that made the difference for me. so we know that we want people to come back to work in san francisco. the people who have come not come back in the greatest number are actually women in the number one reason, according to the center for american progress 62% is because they cannot find child care childcare. and so, you know, for me, in the cost benefit analysis of what mr. egan told us last week of, you know, the incentive that we are providing for folks who might lease up versus what we know, what has been quantified will get people here. and it's a very complicated issue. the coming back to work is not just one thing, it's many things. but this very small commercial tax decrease. it's not in the same level as what we lose by not building a system of universal childcare, which by the way, we can focus on downtown. we can focus on the areas where we want people to come back to work. but that is a personal anecdote, and i'm making a plea for you. but you know, i want to say we all share the collective goal to incent new businesses to come back to san francisco, to downtown, particularly to add back the vibrancy that we have lost downtown. and based on some of the initial economic analysis, the long term impacts and costs as a share for chance that outweigh the potential benefits , i know that this board will work closely with a mayor on the gross receipts tax and other measures, but child care and other essential types of services are also a part of the economic recovery, and they don't hit everyone the same way. this is also a gender equity issue and an issue for service workers, particularly, i look forward to thinking more boldly and courageously about all of the various elements that we need to breathe new life back into our economy. so as for item 12, the proposal to reduce the baseline of busy, i just want to say that this has been really, really difficult and i want to acknowledge the disappointment and the pain that the provider community is feeling. i also want to thank chair chan in particular for your outreach to the chinese speaking providers. these are small business women who are often left out of the conversation because they don't speak english and work really hard to take care of others. so i really want to thank you personally for your engagement and involvement in that. the uh, so i just want to say that, you know, despite the difficulty, it is difficult to accept because it goes against the spirit of the b c initiative and sets up an unfortunate precedent. the language and the initiative for bbc was deliberately written so that new revenue would supplement it existing funding, not supply it, because we're tired of dealing with that. we already know that the existing funds we have, we might not even make a dent in the growing need for childcare, particularly for infants and toddlers. and that's not acceptable. we already know that there's a desperate need for more funding to support families with young children, babies and toddlers. however, i also want to recognize that we are in a really difficult budget situation and i want to thank all of you for being here. long hours, day after days, and tackling it all. i also want to thank ben rosenfield. thank you so much for your work and for your thought partnership. and for joining for doing the same. it's been really a lot. so that being said, it is not prudent for us to balance a budget on one time. fixes but this is before us today. we have to tackle it. and so i would like to propose the amendments that you have before you to consider. and it would still result in roughly the same amount of funding available in the general fund to help balance this budget. but it does not set a precedent for reducing the bbc baseline in future years. so since bbc was held up in litigation, the revenues collected interest over time. it is a roughly the same amount of interest as what we need to balance the budget. so this amendment would tie the amount we're freeing up in the general fund to the interest accrued instead of reducing the baseline outright. this amendment would be a credit against the baseline so that we will be using the amount collected in interest to the fund. so for fiscal year 2324, the credit against the baseline for interest earned would be up to 20 million for fiscal year 2425. it would be up to 10 million. there's also language in the amendments that i submitted that states that these credits will not be applied against the base amount of any year in which the babies and families first fund is less than 100 million. the other change to the proposed legislation is that in the event the deficit in fiscal year 2324 is less than 200 million, we can only hope as adjusted at the time in march of 2024, that it would undo the freeze in the growth of the baseline as is currently proposed. so that just gives us an out if that happens . so this does not change the fact that up to 30 million of funds would that would have otherwise been used for early care in education will now be used for other budgetary priorities. i want to acknowledge that. and, you know , empathize with the pain. but i hope that we find a way to resolve this issue in the future without having to do this again . the baseline is there for a reason. again, i just want to thank our controller, ben rosenfield, and also the city attorney team, john guv'nor. scott webber. and for all their quick word, smithing and creative thinking. so thank you, chair chan, for your leadership in. i ask for your support colleagues. thank you. supervisor safai thank you. thank you, supervisor melgar, for all your hard work on this. thank you to the childcare community for your patience with me. i know we had a lot of conversations. i know you understood my anxiety. my anxiety was both for you and your long term success, as well as the success of where the source of this money would come from. and you've heard us talk today about some of the true worries that we have in the city in terms of our leasing. i do want to acknowledge that. i think that this process was unfairly thrust upon you and thrust upon us in a way that we could not have a thoughtful conversation in advance to prepare everyone truly for what the magnitude of what this would mean. and in fact, we were reacting in a very haphazard way, and we had and it caused a lot of discomfort. it caused a lot of anxiety. and i would just say i appreciate supervisor melgar intervening and working and all of the staff that she mentioned and other members of the board here. but i think we ended up with probably the best solution fo

melgar for working with advocates on this. i read the supervisor, melgar sorry amendments and it's perfect. brilliant. and just just want to appreciate you both. thank you so much for your work on this. thank you. and supervisor malka . thank you. chair chan and colleagues, i really just first of all, want to thank all the early care providers and the families who have been in this process and sort of woken up to our political process. it has been an amazing thing to watch. so i want to say thank you so much. i am here to implore the committee not to pass item number 11. so i just want to tell you a little bit just personally years ago, i was offered a job by the then mayor , gavin newsom, because i had just come back into town after having been in graduate school on the east coast. and my little my girls were little. i was also offered three other jobs at the same time. and i took this job because i found childcare after school, childcare nearby, within a block of where of one south, which is where the office was. and that made the difference for me. so we know that we want people to come back to work in san francisco. the people who have come not come back in the greatest number are actually women in the number one reason, according to the center for american progress 62% is because they cannot find child care childcare. and so, you know, for me, in the cost benefit analysis of what mr. egan told us last week of, you know, the incentive that we are providing for folks who might lease up versus what we know, what has been quantified will get people here. and it's a very complicated issue. the coming back to work is not just one thing, it's many things. but this very small commercial tax decrease. it's not in the same level as what we lose by not building a system of universal childcare, which by the way, we can focus on downtown. we can focus on the areas where we want people to come back to work. but that is a personal anecdote, and i'm making a plea for you. but you know, i want to say we all share the collective goal to incent new businesses to come back to san francisco, to downtown, particularly to add back the vibrancy that we have lost downtown. and based on some of the initial economic analysis, the long term impacts and costs as a share for chance that outweigh the potential benefits , i know that this board will work closely with a mayor on the gross receipts tax and other measures, but child care and other essential types of services are also a part of the economic recovery, and they don't hit everyone the same way. this is also a gender equity issue and an issue for service workers, particularly, i look forward to thinking more boldly and courageously about all of the various elements that we need to breathe new life back into our economy. so as for item 12, the proposal to reduce the baseline of busy, i just want to say that this has been really, really difficult and i want to acknowledge the disappointment and the pain that the provider community is feeling. i also want to thank chair chan in particular for your outreach to the chinese speaking providers. these are small business women who are often left out of the conversation because they don't speak english and work really hard to take care of others. so i really want to thank you personally for your engagement and involvement in that. the uh, so i just want to say that, you know, despite the difficulty, it is difficult to accept because it goes against the spirit of the b c initiative and sets up an unfortunate precedent. the language and the initiative for bbc was deliberately written so that new revenue would supplement it existing funding, not supply it, because we're tired of dealing with that. we already know that the existing funds we have, we might not even make a dent in the growing need for childcare, particularly for infants and toddlers. and that's not acceptable. we already know that there's a desperate need for more funding to support families with young children, babies and toddlers. however, i also want to recognize that we are in a really difficult budget situation and i want to thank all of you for being here. long hours, day after days, and tackling it all. i also want to thank ben rosenfield. thank you so much for your work and for your thought partnership. and for joining for doing the same. it's been really a lot. so that being said, it is not prudent for us to balance a budget on one time. fixes but this is before us today. we have to tackle it. and so i would like to propose the amendments that you have before you to consider. and it would still result in roughly the same amount of funding available in the general fund to help balance this budget. but it does not set a precedent for reducing the bbc baseline in future years. so since bbc was held up in litigation, the revenues collected interest over time. it is a roughly the same amount of interest as what we need to balance the budget. so this amendment would tie the amount we're freeing up in the general fund to the interest accrued instead of reducing the baseline outright. this amendment would be a credit against the baseline so that we will be using the amount collected in interest to the fund. so for fiscal year 2324, the credit against the baseline for interest earned would be up to 20 million for fiscal year 2425. it would be up to 10 million. there's also language in the amendments that i submitted that states that these credits will not be applied against the base amount of any year in which the babies and families first fund is less than 100 million. the other change to the proposed legislation is that in the event the deficit in fiscal year 2324 is less than 200 million, we can only hope as adjusted at the time in march of 2024, that it would undo the freeze in the growth of the baseline as is currently proposed. so that just gives us an out if that happens . so this does not change the fact that up to 30 million of funds would that would have otherwise been used for early care in education will now be used for other budgetary priorities. i want to acknowledge that. and, you know , empathize with the pain. but i hope that we find a way to resolve this issue in the future without having to do this again . the baseline is there for a reason. again, i just want to thank our controller, ben rosenfield, and also the city attorney team, john guv'nor. scott webber. and for all their quick word, smithing and creative thinking. so thank you, chair chan, for your leadership in. i ask for your support colleagues. thank you. supervisor safai thank you. thank you, supervisor melgar, for all your hard work on this. thank you to the childcare community for your patience with me. i know we had a lot of conversations. i know you understood my anxiety. my anxiety was both for you and your long term success, as well as the success of where the source of this money would come from. and you've heard us talk today about some of the true worries that we have in the city in terms of our leasing. i do want to acknowledge that. i think that this process was unfairly thrust upon you and thrust upon us in a way that we could not have a thoughtful conversation in advance to prepare everyone truly for what the magnitude of what this would mean. and in fact, we were reacting in a very haphazard way, and we had and it caused a lot of discomfort. it caused a lot of anxiety. and i would just say i appreciate supervisor melgar intervening and working and all of the staff that she mentioned and other members of the board here. but i think we ended up with probably the best solution fo

melgar. i want to thank jason from sfgovtv, our clerk today is elijia seaneders. >> commissioner chan. >> ash cent >> commissioner dorsey. >> present wrchl commissioner engardio. present. >> commissioner mandelman. >> present. >> melgar. >> present >> supervisor peskin. where present. >> preston. >> present. >> commissioner ronen. >> present. commissioner stefani.

melgar. (indiscernible) san francisco land use coalition. first of all, i would like to praise supervisor melgar for requiring these units to be under rent control. while the rent control status won't make any of these new units affordable today, but it may work to the benefit of tenants decades later. having said that, we are concerned with the fate of rent controlled multi-unit buildings who demolitions are not protected by this legislation. we understand that for such units as my general public comment referred to, we are going to be relying on sb330 to figure out what the replacement units are supposed to look like. so, as most everybody knows, there are tons of single family homes in these so called well resourced neighborhoods that come with adu and udu and that will put them under the rent control status and require sb330 to kick in to help planning to address the issue of tenants displacement and whether or not the units are going to be up for sale or rent and if they are going to be up for rent, if there are tenants low income tenants living in the units then the new replacement units should be offered at the same income level. so, the problem with relying on sb330 is this, we two problems. for one, sb330 i guess most people probably don't know because we don't think too much about the future, sb330 is supposed to be sunseted in 2030, and in the absence of demolition control for rent controlled multi-family dwelling units the demolition of such units will be legalized when sb330 is sunseted in 7 years from now. we are sure this is not the outcome supervisor melgar intended and that's why we strongly urge the supervisor to amend the legislation to provide demolition protection for rent controlled multi-family units. also, sb330 has the provisions for right of return and setting the rent for the replacement units. my question is, who is supposed to notify tenants when the replacement unit is ready to move back in, and who is supposed to enforce which agency in the city is supposed to enforce this? i know the planning has issued directive in terms of the time of filing the application, the developers also provide this information, but that is not clear to me, so please do elaborate on that. thank you very much. >> seeing no additional members of the public coming forward in the chambers, let's go to the remote callers. >> good afternoon. my name is george wooding. i wanted to say first eugene (indiscernible) i think moore hit the nail on the head when she asked the question why go to 6 instead of 5? if you are around (indiscernible) you realize if

melgar. >> aye. >> i would like to make a motion to condition this one week. on continuance to june 12, 2023 as amended. vice chair preston. >> aye >> member supervisor peskin. >> aye. >> chair melgar. >> aye. why there are 3 aye's. >> thank you that motion passes. i will note through the chair to deputy city attorney pierson the amendments we adopted will require a few changes to the second revise legislative digest. >> thank you, president supervisor peskin. go to the last item 3. >> item 3 ordinance amending the planning code exempt eligible commercial to residential reuse from impact fees exception of inclusionary housing requirements affirming plan determination under ceqa and findings. >> thank you, madam clerk we have madison tammy from supervisor dorsey's office who's legislation had is and he woo lilly again from the planning department. >> thank you. chair melgar and good afternoon president supervisor peskin and supervisor preston. the legislation before you today wave feeos dmeshl to residential use projects the same were addressed in the mayor and president supervisor peskin's legislation. last year supervisor mar asked the bla to conduct a report commercial to residential and this report yielded several recommendations to consider. one was delaying reducing or eliminating impact fees. report around office conversions and previewed findings at this committee a time ago special one thing in this report was a suggestion to reduce impact fees. this is convergent of 2 things. rousing bear dwroers house and revitalizing downtown. with the goals our office worked with planning on the legislation. the department identified the fees that would apply in conversions and our office moved forward to wave all fees except for inclusionary housing requirements. office engaged with developers. spur and are east cut on this legislation and hope to have your

melgar. >> aye. >> i would like to make a motion to condition this one week. on continuance to june 12, 2023 as amended. vice chair preston. >> aye >> member supervisor peskin. >> aye. >> chair melgar. >> aye. why there are 3 aye's. >> thank you that motion passes. i will note through the chair to deputy city attorney pierson the amendments we adopted will require a few changes to the second revise legislative digest. >> thank you, president supervisor peskin. go to the last item 3. >> item 3 ordinance amending the planning code exempt eligible commercial to residential reuse from impact fees exception of inclusionary housing requirements affirming plan determination under ceqa and findings. >> thank you, madam clerk we have madison tammy from supervisor dorsey's office who's legislation had is and he woo lilly again from the planning department. >> thank you. chair melgar and good afternoon president supervisor peskin and supervisor preston. the legislation before you today wave feeos dmeshl to residential use projects the same were addressed in the mayor and president supervisor peskin's legislation. last year supervisor mar asked the bla to conduct a report commercial to residential and this report yielded several recommendations to consider. one was delaying reducing or eliminating impact fees. report around office conversions and previewed findings at this committee a time ago special one thing in this report was a suggestion to reduce impact fees. this is convergent of 2 things. rousing bear dwroers house and revitalizing downtown. with the goals our office worked with planning on the legislation. the department identified the fees that would apply in conversions and our office moved forward to wave all fees except for inclusionary housing requirements. office engaged with developers. spur and are east cut on this legislation and hope to have your