and then i sent it out to a lot, the memo, a separate memo, out to a lot of people the reason i did it this has not been done before. there's a website that exists now, rumsfeld.com, people can go in, they are going in in large numbers and i thought people ought to know their names are in some memos and i didn't want them to be surprised. i told all of them i doubted there was a single memo that referenced them that they had not already seen. it would have been something i sent to them earlier or something they sent to me or we were discussing something. the only surprise would be that sud lynn a bunch of people unknown to them or me would be seeing memos and reading them. >> i saw a couple of cases where a memo was classified and you got the defense department to declassify it. my first reaction when i saw that is, if i want one of those, i have to go through the freedom of information act to do it. is that a little bit unfair to the outside world, that you can get something declassified that i couldn't? >> new yorko, i wouldn't think . for example u.s. ambassador to nato back in 1973

there were four goals in your memo. they rarely guided the assessment and have been supported -- they really guided the assessment and have been supported by a senior management. this goal rally came from former commissioner olague

i'm not sure that we ever wrote a formal minority memo. the big question in the early days was, does the grounds for impeachment have to be a crime? and i can remember being of the view early on that really it should be required that it's a crime or there is really no stopping point any president could be impeached for anything. and the only check would be political. the ultimate memo that we filed, all filed said, well, what if a president took up a life of pleasure in a foreign land? that might not be a crime under u.s. statutory law, but it certainly would be grounds for removal from office. and i found and find that rather persuasive, and i guess the dirty little secret is that the only check is political. i remember early on congressman gerald ford, future president ford, had said an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the house and two thirds of the senate say it is. and everyone said, oh, poor gerry ford, played too much football without a helmet. really doesn't anything. and then joe wood task force, stated publicly. you

bottom it said burn this memo. they burned all the copies but we found them anyway. we subpoenaed the secretary. we subpoenaed her dictation notebook, he's dictating the memo, she writes it in there. turns it over, starts another one. finishes it up puts it on the shelf. she retyped it for us. we gave the memo to haldeman and his mouth dropped. didn't think we had it. hard to argue that it's not significant. you misinterpret when it said burn this memo at the bottom of it. irwin quoted the bible. here's what he didn't know. i told him this once. he said nothing is covered up that shall not be uncovered. what you whispered in private places will be shouted from the house tops. luke 12th chapter verses 2 to 3. then there's the last lesson of watergate. there will be a lot over the next two years, three years because we think of our anniversary as one of when the committee started. where are they now? well, a lot of them are in this room. and we say the system worked, the president resigned, a new president said our n

. >> --memo ochoa paÓ . >> (♪ ♪) . >> memo ochoa pago derecho de piso jugando en un equipo de franciaar memo ochoa en brasil . >> con una oferta atractiva. >> león gano a pumas 4 a 3. >> pachuca ganó 3 a 1. >> américa perdió y san diego a 1. >> hoy se viene un encuentro de italia y españa en la final de la eurocopa,es un duelo pendiente, son 18 años que italia gano a españa en el mundial de estados unidos en el 94, mañana la balanza esta para cualquiera. >> estamos en el partido más importante . >> venimos haciendo un trabajo de hace años. >> italia ha cambiado, ha ido de menos a más, empezó bien con nosotros y terminó mejor, se merece la final. >> y mañana tomaremos la mejor decisión . >> vamos a mla casa de los gigante con sincinati. >> miguel cairo ponia la pelota, sacozar anotaba, gano sinsinati 2 a 1. >> okland, no pudo aguantar la ventaja, los atleticos con 6 derrotas, y el debut luiz pérez, con victoria . >> texas gano sumando 50 victorias. >> san josé gano a galaxy de los Ángeles . >> yo soy willyam bonilla. >> beatriz regreso contigo. >> san josé es la capital de la gimnasia

those memos, torture memos written by dputty assistant attorney general john yu advice the u.s. government that acts widely regarded as torture might be legally permissionable under an expansive interpretation of presidential authority. at least one of these memos was leaked to the public while others were obtained through litigation. . the memos were widely criticized as legally flawed and morally indefensible. president obama repudiated the opinions in early 2009. the source of the leak for those memos were never found. and we have leaks that have occurred throughout every administration that has served in america. is there any particular reason why we should be so draw mattically concerned about the recent spad of leaks that have occurred? >> if i could congressman, you put your finger on an interesting point, whether there are good leaks or bad leaks. some people say we have to allow leaks because that's the only way information about wrong doing within the government is going to get surfaced. but that's not the case. now congress in its wisdom has passed a series of whistle

i want to put into the record of momentum and -- a memo. they provided a memo a round traffic mitigation, and if i could quote a couple of aspects, it says under the planning department's impact, we are expecting a number of them to degrade to e or f, and in 20 plus years, 14 intersections will hit that, and they are stating five of the 14 intersections will be in the cathedral hill campus very good, -- cathedral hill campus area, and the final eir recognizes the proposed mitigation measures will not reduce the anticipated traffic impacts to a lessened level either by 2013 or the year 2035, so their recommendation is that they need to have a traffic mitigation fund to ensure we will be able to get to the place. they use the model of the treasure island project, which set aside $5 million to support alternative modes of traffic if we do not reach 50% by the year when the 35, and i want to mention that, because that is just add additional information i have requested as well. >> just to address, if you would not mind sharing that, and i appre

apparently, the memo -- it did exist, correct? >> i do not know. commissioner sugaya: there were some accounts that a memo existed with respect to the scenario where cpmc profits would be driven down close to the 1%. i was wondering if we did find out whether the author thought of that idea or took it from me? if you recall, i did make the observation that perhaps because cpmc's profits and revenues go to sutter health, sutter health could drive down the cpmc profits to the point where they could be seen as insolvent. >> i will ask mr. rich. >> i will note that there was no board of appeals and there was no historic preservation decision. if we could move forward on your calendar to general public comment category. it has a 15-minute time limit. at this time, members of the public may address you two items of interest to the public. with the exception of agenda items. agenda items may not be addressed during this category, but only at the time they are reached on calendar. for this category, each member of the public may address you for up to three

it was a 2010 priority on our memos. there was a 2011 memo on discretion. the move began going case by case through the 350,000 cases in the backlog. we found that in doing so, that was not enough to really clear out and get out of the huge backlog we had in a lower priority cases. this memo takes the lowest of the low priority cases. >> i am familiar with the policy. my response to that is, if you are right on the policy, then you ought to be able to convince the people who passed the laws that it is a legislative issue not an executive issue. that is an example of congress saying to the judge, you have the discretion when it comes to sentencing. it will be 60 months for a garden variety regardless of whether you think that ought to be. my guess is when you were the u.s. attorney in arizona, if a judge deported below the guidelines, it would appeal because it was out of their discretion. my question is, what is our remedy as lawmakers when you ignore laws that have been passed? what is our remedy? to cut off the funding? to direct to you? the explanation i

there was a memo written. i don't remember the name of it, but it was a fairly elaborate memo about what was a reason for impeachment. and so that sort of meshed into what i was doing. >> may i stop you there? bill weld and hillary rodham worked on that. did you participate at all in that process? >> i think it stayed in discussions. i did not participate in the research. i remember discussions about, for example, whether we were talking about, you know, obviously what high crimes and misdemeanors means in the constitution, that phrase. i remember talking about and my having a view, which i think others shared, of the need to read that phrase in connection with what the constitution says about the duties of the president, particularly to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. and so that high crime or misdemeanor i recall thinking personally and discussing with others could well be something that a president was uniquely able to commit, a constitutional crime that the president was uniquely able to co

talking points memo, if you missed it, you do want to see this talking points memo.ng president obama and mitt romney. very more memo and very proud of the fact we are able to clarify this important situation. also we would like to spout off about the factor, if you would like to spout off, go to our website any time if you wish to opine. word of the day, do not be a jackanapes. that word is used in the new movie "brave," a pixar movie for kids but it's good. they dragged me to it i'm

that's the subject of this evening's talking points memo. according to a new cnn poll the country is divided over the supreme court's upholding obama care. 50% supporting the decision. 49% not supporting it here is something interesting according to a kaiser foundation poll. 41% of americans don't even know what's going on vis-a-vis obama care, that's a lot of folks. they should know because it directly effects every one of us. so let's start with chief justice roberts. his ruling maintaining the legality of obama care is actually a conservative decision. judicial activism means judges make laws from the bench and right leaning americans hate that. so roberts did not want to overturn a law that had been passed by congress. and he searched for a way not to strike obama care down. it was a tough go for roberts who initially wanted no part of obama care. >> i am told by two sources with specific knowledge of the court's deliberations that roberts initially sided with the conservatives in this case. and was prepared to strike down the heart of t

didn't send he and delivered a memo to four senior lehman executives one of whom was the c.f.o. of lehman brothers. and said in the memo and this executive matthew lee was in charge he was executive in charge of lehman brothers global balance sheet so he was a very relevant high level person and he said in the memo. i feel that it is like ethical and legal obligation to bring to your attention the fact that there are billions of dollars of unjustified assets on lehmann brothers balance sheet now that seems to me a pretty clear indication that there's something inadequate with your financial controls. and and there's similarly equally explicit evidence about. many other examples including the executives of goldman sachs lying to customers. about the nature of the securities that they were being sold right and i thank you for getting some of those that concrete examples i do think that's helpful. and you got lots more helpful information from my charles ferguson interview after the break also still ahead wall street bankers may know the beta of a stock or portfolio but it seems th

massey. >> i thought we were on the other memo. this is something we have been working on for a very long time and i think it's going to save a lot of resources and make life easier for the regulating community and it reduces a lot of paperwork for the staff and i think the public uses the information will still have quick assess to all of the information they need and deserve. i just wanted to thank steven for really a lot of work. we spent several days in sacramento working

this memo that tim geithner wrote was nothing more than a sequence of cut and paste from the banks memos? >> well, sadly it's hardly news that the new york fed was doing the bidding of the banks. one of the promise that we had to the lead up to the crisis was that all these regulators were captive to wall street generally and they understood their job as serving the banks and being their advocates. it's just another example of one of the fundamental problems that we had that created the crisis. trying to figure out how to put strong teeth in the laws and regulation so that over time we wouldn't revert back to what we see here, which is not even scribes. they just copy it and send it in, and you don't have to follow up unless one of the banks rings you up and say, why don't you do that again. >> eliot: matt, you've written--i don't think this is one of these guys who sees conspiracy behind every event of life. but you've seen the reality of the convergence of power. when you look at what the new york fed did sending out one memo and then nothing after that how do you interpret it? >> i t

massey. >> i thought we were on the other memo. this is something we have been working on for a very long time and i think it's going to save a lot of resources and make life easier for the regulating community and it reduces a lot of paperwork for the staff and i think the public uses the information will still have quick assess to all of the information they need and deserve. i just wanted to thank steven for really a lot of work. we spent several days in sacramento working on this and so i just wanted to point out that he did great work. he deserves the thanks of the commission and so does member ammiano as well. >> on behalf of the commission, thank you, mr. massey, for your efforts. any comments, questions from the commissioners? ms. studley? commissioner studley: i know that we have been working for quite a while on this and i begin with, i focus on the advantages for the public. what i found most compelling in the executive director's report were the way it allows public users of the system to get integrated information and

talking points memo, if you missed it, you do want to see this talking points memo. president obama and mitt romney. very more memo and very proud of the fact we are able to clarify this important situation. also we would like to spout off about the factor, if you would like to spout off, go to our website any time if you wish to opine. word of the day, do not be a jackanapes. that word is used in the new movie "brave," a pixar movie for kids but it's good. they dragged me to it i'm usually out and jackanapes is in the movie. thanks for watching. i'll bill o'reilly. the spin stops right here. we are definitely looking out for you. >> sean: tonight the obama campaign proves that it's in panic mode and go head to head with james carville but they stoop to a new low claiming that mitt romney may have committed a felony. deputy campaign manager said that governor romney allegedly falsified his sec filings during his tenure at bain capital. it prompted governor romney to demand an apology but they said governor romney should stop whining. >> he is not going to get an apol

it was a 2010 priority on our memos. there was a 2011 memo on discretion. the move began going case by case through the 350,000 cases in the backlog. we found that in doing so, that was not enough to really clear out and get out of the huge backlog we had in a lower priority cases. this memo takes the lowest of the low priority cases. >> i am familiar with the policy. my response to that is, if you are right on the policy, then you ought to be able to convince the people who passed the laws that it is a legislative issue executive issue. that is an example of congress saying to the judge, you have the discretion when it comes to sentencing. it will be 60 months for a garden variety regardless of whether you think that ought to be. my guess is when you were the u.s. attorney in arizona, if a judge deported below the guidelines, it would appeal because it was out of their discretion. my question is, what is our remedy as lawmakers when you ignore laws that have been passed? what is our remedy? to cut off the funding? to direct to you? the explanation i have h

again, there is a schedule behind your memo. i think it is on our website for purposes of reference. please do your best. there will probably be some glitches in the first month or so but we will try to do reminders' so that we can begin and end a little bit earlier in the evening when we have those long ones for it -- those long ones. i want to direct your attention behind this memo is a director's order advising a security plan for a place of entertainment permit. 3192 16 st. i know that mission station is present and i do not know if they will discuss the matter or not. on tuesday, june 19, a director's order was issued based on the incident resulted in the death of a man outside of a venue. after meeting with mission station permit officer, it was determined that a nexus could be made and that security improvements were in order. the venue was extremely cooperative. we do expect immediate improvement. i think it was the weekend after we did that, mr. brunelli was out there. it includes increased training, increased surveilla

what the memo says that has now got lawmakers up in arms once again.: new concerns about what the healthcare law could really end up costing americans, that explosive report ahead. martha: and a controversy about what some firefighters were doing in the devastating aftermath of a nasty storm in washington d.c. what happened here to spark an investigation. >> i thought it was mighty strange, but i ain't never saw that gun before, you know. ♪ ♪ proud to and on our own ♪ proud to be homegrown ♪ a familiar face and a name you know ♪ ♪ can you hear it? ♪ fueling the american spirit ♪ no matter when, no matter where ♪ ♪ marathon will take you there ♪ fueling the american spirit why does my mouth feel dryer than i remember it to be? there are more people taking more medication, so we see people suffering from dry mouth more so. we may see more cavities, bad breath, oral irritation. a dry mouth sufferer doesn't have to suffer. i would recommend biotene. the enzymes in biotene products help supplement enzymes that are naturally in saliva. biotene helps moisten

that's the memo from their campaign. when i'm next to him, you better not. >> eric: by far, the most popular stop on "the five" trail is this. >> who are we missing again? oh, no! oh! >> eric: i don't know. i have no idea where to start that. that is so compelling. that video is so compelling, beckel. a lot of people want to know if that was your real hair, was hair flopping over, what was that? >> bob: it was my suspenders. >> greg: bumper stickers. >> bob: i may be ugly, but i do have hair. that i guarantee you. you want to talk about something else? >> dana: we should talk about that for a second. there is a slight dispute, because the video is plain. i didn't hit the exact target but i must have hit it hard enough or hit it on the way back, i got you. >> bob: ridiculous. >> dana: you were taunting me before that. >> bob: do we have to watch this thing? >> dana: yes. >> bob: you triggered it. >> greg: your legs are the sexiest things. >> kimberly: you could use nair on those. >> eric: by the way, we'll talk a lot more

and in that memo he did not say there is criminality ongoing, stop it. >> right. also was written after the "wall street journal" has published a lengthy expose detailing the problems with libor. so to put in a memo that the problems with libor was not exactly ground breaking. i think part of the problem is that everybody knew something was going on with this rate and it was just business as usual and people accepted the proud to because, hey, that's the way we have always done it. and it's a little bit analogous to the dot-com scandal. where everybody knew this was happening, and people just said that is business as usual. >> you are right. the everybody knows and just kind of let it continue. but your point at the top, which is so interesting, that the republicans wanted to go after geithner, and the republicans wanted to go after jamie dimon. that suggests the bizarre prism through which every issue is vied in washington. >> yes. it is shocking to me because you would think in both cases these are things that people could be similarly aligned, what happened at

>> you have a copy of the revised memo which we drop off this morning. we worked with the police department during the last week to ensure that we're netting out of it, for example, civilians that are at the occ. it does show, as you can see on table b of the memo, it shows a growth in budgeted civilians since opposition c was passed in 2004. 222 to 326 currently. and the proposed budget as the additional positions for the current year. we worked with the police department to clarify which -- in which cases civilian positions that are proposed in the budget or that we reviewed in the past are currently being staffed by light duty officers, and almost uniformly throughout the proposed budget in cases where the police department and the mayor's office have not proposed to civilianize a position that has been part of a previous review, that position is being staffed to the light duty officer, which makes some sense. so civilianizing the majority of positions that we recommended the past that have not been proposed will not allow the department to redeploy f

labovitz i think was one of the key people who wrote that memo, the grounds for impeachment memo. i think hillary helped on it, too, on that memo. but that's the conclusion we reached at the time. and i think that's the conclusion that's still correct. >> since you oversaw as much as a kibitzer as a supervisor of the task forces tell us how you came to conclude how to present the information to the committee. you had an enormous amount of information. >> yeah. well, this was -- here i give most of the credit not to myself because i don't deserve the credit but to doar. this is an interesting problem. doar -- well, look. the thing really took off after we got the tapes. we realized the stuff on the tapes was very powerful. and, of course, you had the 18-minute gap and all those issues. doar was the one who decided that we're going to present this in a sort of low-key, neutral fashion, she is sort of statements of facts, whatever we call them at the time. i haven't refreshed myself on this and these books that were given with listing fact after fact after fact. statements of informa