. >> mendacious. >> liar is a good one. >> and eight dated campaign film gets a fresh look a the supreme court hears a livy arguments on a campaign finance and free- speech. and the 9/11 attacks, eight years later. it was not a great summer for president obama. his approval ratings drop steadily and was also a noisy summer, most coming from opponents of his proposal to reform health care. he told a joint session that it is time to stop the noise and get to work. >> the time for bickering is over. the time for games has passed. now is the season for action. >> the president announced three basic goals for his health care reform package. >> and will provide more security and stability for those who have health insurance. it will provide insurance for those who don't. and it will slow the growth o health care costs for our families, businesses, and our government. >> noble goals. i am sure we all agree. the question is how we get there and the other question, of course, how we pay for it. colby, you have the same week after week this game is far from over. it is a mistake to count the presi

. >> mendacious -- >> liar is a good one. >> a campaign film gets a fresh look at the supreme court hears lively arguments on campaig finance and free-speech. and the 9/11 attac, eigh years later. let's face it, not a great summer for president obama. his approval rings dropp steadily. it was also a noy summer. most, from oppents of h proposal to rerm health care. the psident told a joint session of congress thatt is time to stop the noi and get to work. >> the time for bickeng is over. e time for games has passed. now is the season r action. >the president announced three basic goals for his health care reform package. >> it will provideore security and stability for thoswho ha alth insurance. it will provi insurance r the who don't. and itill slow the growth of health-care costs for our familiesbusinesses, and our government. >> noblgoals. i am sure we a agree. the question is how weet there and how we pay for it. colby, you havbeen saying week after week that this game is far from over. it is a mistake to count the president out toearly. wh did you think of th speech? >> i thi he achie

mendacious -- >> liar is a good on >> a cpaign film gets aresh look athe supreme court hear livelyrguments on campaign finae and free-speech. and the 9/11 attacks, eight yes later. let's face it, not a grea summeror president obama. his approval ratings dropped steadily. it was also a noisy summ. most, from opponents o his proposal to reform heah care. the presidentold a joint seion of congress that it i time to stop the noise andet to wor > the time for bickering is over. the timeor games has passed. now is the sean for action. >> the president announced thre basic goalfor his heth care reform package. >> it will prode more security and stability for ose who have health insurance. it will pvide insurance for those who don't. anit will slow the growth of health-care costs for o famies, businesses, andur government. >> ble goals. i am sure all agree. the question is howe get there and how we pay fort. colby, youave been saying week after week that this gamis fa from over. it is a mistake to cou the president outoo early. what did you think ofthe spee? >> ihink he achieved a couple of gls. o

. >> mendacious, venial, sneaky. >> ideological, intolerant. >> liar is a good one. >> scares the hell out of me. >> looks good in pantsuit. >> moyers: never heard of it? that's not surprising. very few people saw it in the first place. but "hillary: the movie" may prove to have an impact on the political scene greater than even the producers could have dreamed. that's because it got tied up in a legal battle-- a very complex legal battle over federal laws regulating certain aspects of corporate union and special interest funding for political speech in elections. the film was created by a conservative group called citizens united. they wanted to use on-demand television to distribute "hillary: the movie" and to buy commercials promoting it. but because the film was partially financed by corporate sponsors, the federal election said no, it would violate the 2002 bipartisan campaign reform act, also known as the mccain- feingold, which restricts the use of corporate money directly for or against candidates. citizens united appealed the case all the way to the supreme court, where it was