but mendel was, of course -- and mendel didn't -- you know, he dropped his work and he went back to being -- he was an administrator of the monastery. as far as the protestant negative reaction is really early 20th century. there was more so. even in this country, for example, joseph henry, the head of smithsonian was a supporter and a curator therefore. you don't -- the reaction is really 20th century interestingly. someone, yeah. >> i was very interested in the influence of romanticism in darwin's motivation as a scientist? were other scientists -- did they also in his era have it? >> yes, it was very common especially for those who traveled because a lot of romantic poetry has to do with travel. also, the poets were greatly beloved so everyone read them. really, everyone. i suppose, popular music is a little more. and they quoted them. and then, of course, the darwin team was very close to the romantic poets. some were supported for a while by some of the wedgewds who were the maternal side of darwin's family. i mean, literally supported. his living was supported. and so they knew them

mendel la stated 27 years.gine somebody telling him on the 25th year, you've been here a quarter of a century. and if he had left and sold out, he was two years away from walking from prison to president. you can't give up just because it looks like it takes too long. i can tell you as a minister, i say it all the time, the hardest job of a black preacher is to preach the funeral or an irrelevant negro. you've got to make it up. people laying there dead, their family sitting there and you've got to hallucinate a life for them they never lived. you need to ask yourself that when your life is over, what can they say about me? and if you are not helping your child or some child -- if you're not correcting the problem, then you are wasting your time and your life. because it's going to end, and what are we going to say about you? if you're not satisfied with your answer, you ought to leave here and go to work. >> chuck, you raised katrina, and we talked about government and white folks, but i i always said poverty

was when the mandela, former wife of nelson mandela, and the head of the anc youth league -- winnie mendellappeared in the message was clear, this is not just about athletics. south africa is being target -- a south african person is being targeted unfairly. >> thank you very much. russell is here with the latest sports news. >> we will have is -- look ron james world tour. minnesota twins' fourth straight win. a win over the baltimore orioles by two-one in the american league. orioles struck first on brian roberts double in the third inning. his 60th rbi in a season. baker got michael aubrey to foul out left the field making a serious ground and borrowing a little bit by crashing into the twins' bullpen did another great defensive play in the next inning. the twins leveled the scores at one of the piece later in the evening. before this sacrifice fly allowed them to move into a 2-1 lead and eventually sealed the win. where has lebron james, the nba most audible player of 2009, got to now and his tour of tent cities? beijing, where exactly a year ago, august 21, 2008, he won gold with the u

mendel, real emphasis on beautiful tailoring.s that a woman can pay a lot of money for a suit or a dress, it has to be exquisitely made. we're at the michael kors show. i thought this was a beautiful show. i mean there were great work clothes, sexy evening dresses and great pops of color. you get a lot with neon orange, neon pink. i think there's a sense that, you know, okay maybe the economy is tanking but we all want to look like we're having fun. three big trends we already know we're going to see, classic silhouettes, really lady-like suits. day glow colors, whether in sports wear or work wear, really, really bright. and also luxurious fabrics. fur, whether it's real or fake. velvet, gold brocade, leather, crepe. bye. see you back here next season. >> fast forward six months. cindy, thank you for joining us, good morning to you. >> thank you, good morning. >> so here's a trend you predicted way back when in february. you said lady-like suits, neon colors, luxurious fabrics we'd all be seeing in the stores come late august or

foreign journalist somehow, and we know on march 17 when the two ladies were stopped there on me to mendel rivers, it was frozen, and they were with us chinese-korean guide others as well as another tv producer, an older man, a tv producer who got away. again i think the guide may have been an inside deal to position them in exactly the right place so north korea could get this party. >> clayton: this party so what is the payoff is to market elevates them on the world stage. many showing president clinton singer with kim jong-il and elevates -- people say this is exactly what he wanted. he wanted these national pictures. he wanted these photos. >> dave: it legitimizes him. >> clayton: it legitimizes him what the world sanctions and every thing else being rolled out to curb their nuclear program right now. >> dave: you almost wonder, the three american journalists who are now captive in iran, you wonder could this be a similar situation. shane bauer and two others still held in iran and no word on when they might potentially be coming home were no negotiations on that front either. >> alysi

you quoted mendell grove toys approvingly in his characterization of the market and about randomness.iet, in the beginning of your speech he said economics grounding is a science has been solid-- solidified by the ability of data and applications of mathematical and statistical models which everything he would take convention with. do you believe that in addition to helping economists verify their hypothesis or check them against reality, the reliance or should i say over reliance on mathematical models is a blindspot in the circles of academia and economics, and it fails to take into account the wild randomness and the unpredictability of financial and economic cycles. do you think it trumps sometimes common-sense and a healthy account of human nature? >> at least three questions, so i will try to make the distinction. starting with the notion of what randomness. what he wrote, and tried to show, in nature you don't have wild randomness. you have what he calls mild randomness, physical events that can be predicted to a certain extent. he has built mathematical models the model shows