s demand for an implied easement or a prohibit tiff easement over the mercani parcel. there is no easement. even if there were, the city would have to be a party to it, written by the city attorney generally and signed by the fire marshal. that does not exist. there is a temporary license agreement between the appellants and the ballet school, on the overhead again. because the appellant didn't want the ballet school to go out of business, but the appellant explicitly left it up to the ballet school, to the permit holder, to ensure that this egress complied with city code. as it turns out, this agreement does not meet code for egress, and the appellant does not want to be on the hook for liability if something happens with the stampede of people leaving that school over his property. as the court found, again, on the overhead, i'll quote, instead of addressing the actual circumstances with city officials, however, crossroads misrepresented its interest in the set back, there by cutting short the administrative process. there can be little doubt that had crossroads been