merchant. ms. merchant: i don't know how to respond to that, i am asking -- judge mcafee: he may have seen a business card at some point. mr. bradley: i've never been to ms. willis's office in private practice and i have never dealt with where she rented. i did not even know where her office was. ms. merchant: do you remember knowing she rented an office? mr. bradley: yes, that is correct. ms. merchant: do you remember telling me mr. wade and ms. willis would rendezvous at that office? >> i'm going to object. again, hearsay as to how he knows that information. he says he has no personal knowledge. ms. merchant: he did not say he has no personal knowledge, he has not even answered it. >> he will not establish the source because he has never been to her office. judge mcafee: ms. merchant, i know you are trying to impeach him with an inconsistent statement, but if you cannot back up and show what each statement, the acknowledgment -- ms. merchant: i'm not even there yet. i can anticipate the response

would have told miss merchant, wouldn't you? >> i don't know what i would have told miss merchant. she asked me was it accurate. we were discussing the 74,000 that was left out. >> again, if i may direct you just to the portion dealing with the relationship with miss willis and mr. wade. you didn't tell her that there was anything patently false in that because you didn't see anything patently false in that motion, as it relates to the relationship. >> repeat you question, i'm so sorry. >> you did not inform miss merchant that there was anything patently false in that motion that you were presented with as it concerns the relationship because you did not see anything that was patently false, correct? >> objection. asked and answered. cumulative. >> all right, next question, mr. stockton. sustain. >> and you didn't see anything speculative. >> asked and answered. >> i just want to ask you one more question. i'm coming at it from the other way than mr. sadow did. did anybody from the district attorney's office or any witnesses in

merchant, wouldn't you? >> i don't know what i would have told mrs. merchant. she asked me was it accurate. we were discussing the 74,000 that was left out. >> again, if i may direct you to that portion dealing with the relationship between mrs. willis and mr. wade. you didn't tell murtha there was anything patently false in that because you didn't see anything patently false in that relationship, as relates to the relationship. >> repeat your question. i'm so sorry. >> you did not inform mrs. merchant that there was anything patently false in that motion that was -- that you were presented with as it concerns the relationship because you did not see anything that was patently false, correct? >> objection. asked and answered cumulative. >> next question, mr. stockton. sustained. >> you didn't see anything that was speculative in there either, did you? >> asked and answered. >> sustained, mr. stockton. >> i want to ask you one more question. i'm coming at it from the other way that mr. sadow did. did anybody from the district attorney's office or any witnesses i

merchant that there was anything patently false? in that motion that was that you were presented with as it concerns the relationship because you did not see anything that was patently false, correct? objection. asked and answered. cumulative. >> our next question, mr. stockton? to stand. >> and you didn't see anything that was speculative in there either digital, an answer came within a sustained. mr. stockton >> i just want to ask you one more question i'm coming out from the other way that mr. sadow did. did anybody from the district attorney's office or any witnesses in this case contact you about ms merchant's motion from january the eighth of 2004 until today >> did >> anyone contact me about her motion? >> yes. from the district attorney's office or any witnesses or anybody else involved with the case besides the defense >> other than the call that the only personal call that i had was with gay banks. i never spoke to anyone else and to my knowledge, he's not a part of this, so let's all get, judge. >> thank you, mr. stockton

merchant, what about that? >> i let them screenshots of the ones that they weren't there and he sent them to himself on my phone. i also offered to hook my phone up to whatever it is. my phone is an iphone, this is an android. i can't download like you could in a normal text. i told them if they had a system to get all of my text, they can have every single one. >> we can definitely do that. >> your honor, the text that she is submitting now and tendering into evidence are specific parts of the conversation. the entire text chain is a continuous conversation. those particular parts given the witness's testimony should be submitted into evidence and the statements with this testimony today, it would be up to the government, the state if they want to introduce the rest of it. judge mcafee: sure. i think that's a fair point that if you had been confronted with a particular text, that could have been the opportunity to admit it as a prior consistent statement for impeachment. and some of them were, but apparently s

the merchants who stayed here had to be warm and well fed, because from hunger and cold you can’t door, just like centuries ago greets you with a rich carved porch, an accordion player with beer bars and treats from the road. the melted stoves and pies were very good, by the way, it was -35 outside. a great sunny siberian day. alexander sergeevich pushkin called siberia a country of smart people, and mikhailo lomanosov prophetically noted: “the power of russia will grow with siberia.” and both turned out to be right. wonderful people were born and worked in tobolsk, of whom the tabalaks are deservedly proud. here is the tobolsk kremlin - the brainchild of semyon. remezova, before him, endless fires had repeatedly destroyed wooden tobolsk, but at the end of the 14th century, this same semyon remizov laid the foundation for stone construction in tobolsk. thanks to him, the first stone kremlin in siberia appeared here. the tobolsk kremlin is a real white-stone miracle of architectural art throughout siberia. graduates of the tobolsk gymnasium over the years were people who became... the

. >> all right, miss merchant. lay the foundation. >> do you have information that ms. willis and mr. wade met in october of 2019? >> renew my objection. information is not personal information. if the question can be rephrased it may address my concern. >> i want to make sure i understand. they have objected to me calling willis and wade. >> just a matter of foundation, just rephrase. >> do you have knowledge of when willis and wade met? >> object again. personal knowledge. >> overruled. >> thank you. >> do you have personal knowledge of when willis and wade met? >> yes. she told me they met at a conference. i don't know what conference. >> renew my objection. this is not information from this witness. hearsay that was -- >> she said she told me. >> statement against interest, judge. >> the representation of the witness testimony was that miss willis district attorney willis had a conversation with her. that is not statement against interest. district attorney knows it is not a party opponent in this case. the inf

certain trips from miss merchant. >> ok.ou can tie it down, but -- we'll see. >> thank you. >> no information on any trips that miss willis and mr. wade took that he learned it all from miss merchant. that was his testimony. >> sure. conclusion we reach, i think she's going to ask more than one question, though. all right, miss merchant. >> judge, so we can be clear, if he said more than one version, that's all relevant. we are allowed to talk about the different versions that he's told. >> i've overruled the objection miss merchant. >> thank you. >> do you remember telling me that it didn't surprise you that they took the trips that i found in the divorce file because they took many trips to florida, texas, california, and then you told me that they took the trip to california when she moved her daughter there because she failed out of famu. you remember that? >> i don't recall that, but if -- i don't recall. >> ok. judge may i approach? >> sure. you may. >> it's in one of the ones i gave you. look at that and see if it ref

here is such a merchant booking, and without any internet. however, the story about siberia will not be complete without recalling the pickles that were served, preserving merchant traditions, are still served today. for example, tyumen is often added to the definition of the gastronomic capital of siberia. the basis of the local cuisine, like many centuries ago, is... winston, the cognac cigar lover forgot about his bad habits at that moment, and could not tear himself away from the herring from the siberian river, northern sosva. he even took several glasses back then to this same silda, the english princess. ah, her majesty was delighted. chicken cutlets that bear the name of the head of the city and philanthropist, merchant andrei tekutyev, that is, the tikutyev cutlet is also a local gastronomic attraction. and the little crucians, about the size of your palm, oh, i hope you’ve already had breakfast? then let's continue: first , the bones are removed from the crucian carp with tweezers, then the fir is lightly fried, the sauce is served

merchant has prepared on mr. if he's not going to testify, theoretically we are in a position which the court will have to hold him in contempt. and then at that point i guess i would like him to contest while i take it up on appeal. i'm just trying to play through where we are going to be. if we are going to do that we might as well put him on the stand >> that's a good thing to flag now. i agree yesterday during the hearing there was intermingling of 1.6 and attorney-client privilege. now having had the time to paragraphs through that -- parse through that, it does seem that there is a distinction between the two. one is not covered by the evidentiary privilege. and pulling the case, 273 georgia 204 supreme court doesn't make that dis continuation. to that evened, mr. evans, as we work through these issues, i would say when mr. bradley takes the stand i would be directing him to respond and be respond to any questioning that may be covered by rule 1.6. that would be the order of this court. but he that still re

roman >> warnings out to ashley merchant, john merchant roman yes >> mr. schafer >> morning, >> honored break guillen and anthony way shape or papers, president and mr. floyd air mccullough on behalf of >> then we also have ms latham morning, your honor, willing to probably over his late from she waves the president >> and did we get that, mr. mecole also as well for mr. floyd just, making sure. okay. thank you mr. floyd is here. okay. i see mr. floyd is present as well >> all right >> my, parents see. anyone. rolling and behalf of the defendants office anyone, else president. >> who believes they may need to be on the record or address any issue coming up in the proceeding seeing, none >> i'm here. date banks witness but i also represent the candle so all right. thank you, mr. banks >> i want you over for terrence bradley law under subpoena. >> we'll be waiting in the hall. >> all right. and circuit we have you spell your name for the record? >> thank bim. all last name? cho pra all right >> in terms of just a little housekeeping and terms of presenting t

so, we welcome the support in the talking to the merchants and everyone in the community wants to be a part of the process society hotel is part of the community. as well. >> so does anyone before i will take questions before if anyone has questions for the mayor. >> um -- mentioned a safe preventive. [inaudible]. >> why is it taking so long? we did not have a mayor who supported the movement like this one the drug problem is worse since covid. and there has been my view is this is when we the city on a path but i don't know if you want to answer that question. don't want to blame you. living a year or 2. >> >> not a blame as much as most the funding we have to support people who experienced homelessness is state and federal funding and we believe in housing first housing first approach. what that means we bring people to hozing and believe people neil that is hard to do that before and wrap service around that. this is a different model. it is very exciting we'll be engaging in this model but it is -- it is a moss for people who are on the path to recovery. who can be supported in a

merchant? >> you're going to have to narrow that down. >> i can look at my phone. >> have there been any other texts? i think the state has some rebuttal they mentioned so i was just trying to clean that up before it got there. >> try the question one more time. >> is it true that the only text that you and i have ever had has been between me and you, me, you and mr. troper, or you, me and mr. merchant, correct? >> ican look at my phone? >> sure. >> what's the relevance of that? >> they say multiple times there's this third party we talked to and i'm trying to establish this third party. i don't know why it was relevant but the state argued it. >> if ms. merchant doesn't know why it's relevant, then maybe -- [indiscernible] -- >> i think you've been title of the bill show -- you've been able to show what maybe launched this and answered the state's initial claims and so let's get back to the core what have we were here for for this hearing. do you have anything else relevant to ask the witness?

merchant?than i wanted to focus on when you were telling them about your financial straits and you were living month-to-month that is what your financial status was back in 2018. >> we covered that at length. i'm sorry but we have defined new ground. >> if you will let me move on to my point. i point is what you are telling us is that you were in financial straits. really your testimony today is you had a cash hoard of up to $10,000 in cash and where you laid your head at night. there would be no record of it, correct? >> that is not what i'm telling you sir. that's not at all what i'm telling you. what i'm telling you is throughout the course of my life i have always kept cash in my house. that cash has ranged, my father would be ashamed of this because he would say should be more but that cash at times went from $500 to maybe $9000. that is not what i'd -- he would be like that's not what i told you to do. i've always had that amount of money and what i told you is when i travel you are at be

merchant was there. if i'm asked to qualify exactly where that's from -- >> rule of completeness would be if you need to introduce other texts to show the context. if you're saying you haven't seen a copy yet, then i think miss merchant needs to do that before you can decide the next step. >> that's what i was asking him. if that was something he just remembers making up. if he doesn't, then that's fine. >> she referenced text messages and started to go into her packet of papers. >> sure. so you don't have a text message for that. >> i would need time to look through and i don't remember if it was a text or a conversation. >> he has now said he has no knowledge. so on to your next question. >> okay. did mr. wade tell you about the trips he and miss willis took? >> no. >> do you have any knowledge of the trips? >> objection, hearsay. >> overruled. >> i do now. >> okay. but you did not before this proceeding? >> i did not know until you texts that you found that in the deposition of his divorce. i may not

merchant? >> you're going to have to narrow that down. >> i can look at my phone. >> have there been any other texts? i think the state has some rebuttal they mentioned so i was just trying to clean that up before it got there. >> try the question one more time. >> is it true that the only text that you and i have ever had has been between me and you, me, you and mr. troper, or you, me and mr. merchant, correct? >> ican look at my phone? >> sure. >> what's the relevance of that? >> they say multiple times there's this third party we talked to and i'm trying to establish this third party. i don't know why it was relevant but the state argued it. >> if ms. merchant doesn't know why it's relevant, then maybe -- [indiscernible] -- >> i think you've been title of the bill show -- you've been able to show what maybe launched this and answered the state's initial claims and so let's get back to the core what have we were here for for this hearing. do you have anything else relevant to ask the witness?

taraval merchants have had a similar experience.s of disruptions and at the mercy of sfmta and city agencies to finish this project as promised by the end of the year. the sfmta has been clear their funds are restricted to transit and can't use to support merchants. that is why i believe we should use some of the unspent apec funds to help taraval merchants. i work with supervisor chan and former city supervisor katy tang. i and they request 1 million to help businesses suffering on taraval. we are one city. we can help businesses who suffered last fall and those who continue to suffer today. we can look at the budget committee as if we were a emergency room where we triage the problems coming in and direct resources to the areas in code blee polk. i can say taraval is in code blue. it is at risk of dying. we must come together to help a major and vital part of the city. taraval extends from west portal to the ocean across two supervisor district. spend agportion of the funds to help taraval is about saving businesses which benefit

this merchant?> thank you. >> those records demonstrate you paid for travel with yourself and miss willis, correct? >> they should. >> okay, let's just talk about that travel. the first trip is belize in march 2023. is that a trip he took with ms. willis? >> are you asking a question or did you take a trip with miss willis in 2023 to belize? >> i did because you take a trip to california with her with a ms. wilson 20.3 quester. >> i did. >> did you pay for those trips on my credit card? >> i use the credit card to book the travel. >> but she page about cash? >> let me say this. let's take the belize trip for example we started there. that was a birthday gift to me. i paid nothing for that trip zero. >> okay. >> he charges that are on your card she gave you cash for? what you did. >> all the charges. [inaudible] >> if you have more? >> i did. i wanted to get into the charges on the card. so traveling with her is a task. you can probably imagine the attention that happens. so for safety reasons he wou

merchant provided those to us and i appreciate it. and i can't tell if we have an accurate or inaccurate resuscitation if what she gave me is complete. >> we're continuing to hear this debate in the courtroom about what terrence bradley who is a former law partner of nathan wade but also the attorney in his divorce can and cannot say. we thought during the break that this had already been settled, clearly it is not. we want to bring back katie phang, roberts james, former district attorney for dekalb county, georgia, and kristy greenberg, former federal prosecutor who was deputy chief of the criminal division for sdny. so let me ask you, robert. what's happening here? >> well, it sounds like they're trying to ask his law partner or former law partner questions. the problem is when you're asking questions of lawyers about conversations that lawyers may have had with one another, you know, there's various privileges that can be triggered if there was a relationship where, you know, representation was included. and so it sounds like they

merchant last word. >> mr. bradley, if ordered, he's here by subpoena, if ordered to testify, it's not an issue with the bar. my question was not about attorney/client privilege. i'm being very careful not to ask anything that mr. wade asked in furtherance, but i'm been informed that robin -- is on the zoom, so if we want to start back on our original plan, we can call ms. yeardy and have her testify and put mr. wade up and go through the privilege issue with him, and then we won't have to have all these objections, or else i'm happy to continue questioning mr. bradley. >> all right, so ms. merchant, you're saying that your understanding of the evidence that you plan to present that these issues are affected by ms. yeardy in terms of the scope of the privilege and the relationship? >> no, i think -- no, thank you for letting me clarify that. i think that ms. yeardy is going to give me enough to get mr. wade on the stand. once i get mr. wade on the stand. you said i had to present something before i could put mr

i think that's clarify for their own sitting cross, ms merchant? >> i do not recall any other time that he mentioned that they were in a relationship. know okay so other than so you talked about this one time and you said you don't know when it was that, correct? >> that is correct. >> was it before mr. wade before you've got the contract in fulton county, let's start with that. >> i did not recall and come up say again, how did it come up >> do not recall how it came up it was in the back. i know it was i know where it occurred in our offices in the back. i can't tell you what we were discussing prior to that >> did you receive an email from me on january 6 with emotion attached? >> i think i did, yes. yes, i know i know i received i don't know if the date is january 6, but yes, i received yes. >> so you remember receiving that? yes. the date? >> and you reviewed it and then you when i spoke about it you recall that >> do we speak over the phone? are you saying through a text that's what i'm asking you. >> i >> can remember whether it was texts, p

kat merchant know what is normal any more. merchant now know what is normal any more.game.— the on medical grounds in 2014 at the top of her game. when the final whistle went — the top of her game. when the final whistle went and _ the top of her game. when the final whistle went and we _ the top of her game. when the final whistle went and we had _ the top of her game. when the final whistle went and we had won - the top of her game. when the final whistle went and we had won the i whistle went and we had won the world _ whistle went and we had won the world cup— whistle went and we had won the world cup i burst out crying because i thought. _ world cup i burst out crying because i thought. i— world cup i burst out crying because i thought, i was like, i'm never going— i thought, i was like, i'm never going to— i thought, i was like, i'm never going to play rugby again and it was a really— going to play rugby again and it was a really realistic thing that i was never— a really realistic thing that i was never going to put my boots on although— never going to put my bo

miss merchant, i think you made your position clear. i don't think we want to get sidetracked on that. miss merchant, you can call your next witness. take care, mr. partridge. pheu tkpwros. >> -- miss tkpwros. >> motion to quash the subpoenas held in advance waiting for the representation. i believe that the -- miss merchant represented on monday that's truly not accurate. understand the testimony that's now in the record. mr. wade is available, but we have maintained at this time the motion to quash should be granted to understand the court's ruling. >> i'll say, yes, on monday it did seem like the focus was that mr. bradley would be the hook that makes every witness potentially relevant. and we really haven't been able to explore that on the privilege issues that we'll likely have to tackle later. for now as the evidence in front of the court at the moment is that we have a witness who has said this relationship may have predated the affidavit mr. wade filed. i don't see a way around the relevance of the testimony. i'll deny -- state'

merchant, that's okay. listen to the question and keep the answers confined to the questions as best you can. you'll have more than enough ample opportunity when the state is able -- >> it's highly offensive when someone lies on you and try to implicate that you slept with somebody the first day you met them. i take exemption to them. >> you'll have the opportunity to play that when it's the state's attorney to ask more open-ended questions. mrs. merchant? >> thank you, judge. my question is you met at that conference? >> we did. as i stated, he taught the class. i did not meet him when he taught the class. i walked out of the class and i'm not sure if it was that exact class or we went to lunch. we were standing in the vestibule. like outside of the class. me and judge reeves were having a conversation. she worked at a law firm that i worked at back in 1996 -- >> we're getting way affair. i just asked -- >> she's explaining how they met. that was the question asked by mrs. merchant. these answers are more

this topic to reveal our costumes for the bride and groom , maybe merchant outfits were different inls, you need to take the richest and most luxurious materials, the traditional festive attire for votorks consisted of... which a scarf embroidered with patterns was tied, for the bride’s costume i suggest choosing tovta, jacquards and satins, for example, this one, what a beautiful color, salmon or whatever it ’s called in the foreign world, i like that it sparkles so beautifully, it can be played up this gold is somewhere in accessories or in some other details, great, but for the groom’s suit i suggest taking a traditional cut, but the material is more modern - it’s corduroy; in a rich merchant’s closet, men wore a tunic. a shaped braid and a long-brimmed caftan made of thick dark cloth. the trousers, and lower ports, were also made from good quality cloth and tucked into boots. i suggest taking shugai as an additional layer. is it more of a jacket or is it a jacket or a vest? it's like a jacket, you could say, let's make it out of elegant brocade material. let's take the traditiona

merchant? ms.erchant: i just wanted to know -- judge mcafee: actually, what i think we are going to do is what i suggested before, give you a time block and you use and how you think it will best be affected -- effective. there is a lot covered in the evidence but i will plan to rule on it at the same time as well. i believe that you. mr. gillen? we do? mr. gillen: i thought we did. judge mcafee: if you have arguments about forensic misconduct or anything like that, this will be the time for that as well. email, no, i've talked about that, and things evolved. we did not actually send out a notice adding any other motions, but we have some trials starting next week, the next two weeks. we have some homicide trials already scheduled, so i will be following up with you all to schedule the rest of the pretrial motions that we have. >> on friday, we have 1:00 on the issue of disqualification. judge mcafee: that's right, all things disqualification. anything from the state or any other defense, counsel?

miss merchant, any other wits -- witnesses? >> we would call fani willis. >> miss cross. >> quash the district attorney. there's been now lots of testimony from mr. wade. i don't believe there can be a showing for the need for the district attorney to testify as well. for all of the reasons that were cited in the state's motion to quash initially. it's a tremendously high burden to call opposing counsel. i don't believe, given the cumulative nature that would be the subject of the personal details that mr. wade has now testified to. >> miss merchant, what do you think you can establish and have through the testimony of miss willis? and stop there. >> conflict in the evidence, judge. now that mr. wade has testified there's a conflict of multiple different issues [indiscernible] on the first one is the reimbursement issue, the cash, that opens the door in and of itself to miss willis testifying. >> what's the conflict there? >> that he testified that he didn't have receipts but we don't know if miss willis has receipts. so, that'

he spent time stake himself as a merchant seaman and a business person. his father and brother in new orleans. we know him for san francisco's history. establishing himself here arnold 18 twoochl he did one of many things the first to do in yerba buena. was not california yet and was not fully san francisco yet. >> because he was an american citizen but spoke spanish he was able to during the time when america was taking over california from mexico, there was annexations that happened and conflict emerging and war, of course. he was part of the peek deliberations and am bas doorship to create the state of california a vice council to mexico. mexico granted him citizenship. he loaned the government of san francisco money. to funds some of the war efforts to establish the city itself and the state, of course. he established the first hotel here the person people turned to often to receive dignitaries or hold large gatherings established the first public school here and helped start the public school system. he piloted the first steam ship on the bay. a big

the china down merchant association lead the charge. i knowefaly is here today. we appreciate how people come together and support china town during lunar new year and all year round. we also are put nothing a bit extra effort. inform not only keeping the streets clean, thank you, carla short and the streets safe. we ulcment to appreciate our beat officers from the police department and ocea the eyes and ears of the streets. and of them speak cantonese it great for the communities to people in the community to ask questions to. the energy is different now. it is an energy fuelled by excitement. by joy. and the year of the dragon is really about courage and strength and progress. and we are celebrating that progress right here in china town. with so many community leaders including pius lee joining us here today as well as the president of the chinese company mr. c for your work and bringing your father mr.llow we appreciate you being here. it is so wonderful to be here with community. because we are going to make sure that this community in china town d is suppor

listening to merchants. we understand that valencia economic situation is touch and empathize with merchants along valencia and corridors throughout the city. the settee is struggling with larger macro economic issues as it works to return to what it was prior to mandemic. we remain committed to work to insure valencia is vibrant and successful destination for years to come and that concludes the economic analysis we were able to do. >> thank you for that. i think in your other slide deck and presentation you mentioned that there was less foot traffic along valencia. can you expand on that more? >> i believe the foot traffic was within 5 percent. there is a 5 percent decrease in foot traffic but that is within the 10 percent margin of error when we see a significant difference in travel pattern changes. >> you also mentioned there were a 23 percent increase in passenger and food pickups. i do wonder if why the reason we are seeing that increase is because less patrons less folks are going into the different

ms merchants. >> merchants entrance contribution contrary to democracy, your honor, not to mind all right >> that we can keep things moving. ms murphy, next question, please. >> okay. so we've confirmed when you met after that, isn't it true? >> i need to explain this and i think i get to explain my answers when i met him. judge reef introduced us he handed me his business card. i'm unsure if i handed him business card, but we changed information. he said if you ever need any help, give me a call and he walked to the parking lot so after after that, you started dating shortly thereafter, correct? >> a lie. that's one of your lives >> do you robin uri? >> i know her as robin bryant i knew her robin did not go to my college. she went to the college of i went to howard university. she went to morgan state. >> i >> met her through some people i knew in college, we hung out a bit. not much because she was in baltimore and i was in one washington dc on but we hung out a bit after college. i lost contact with i probably didn't see robin again until maybe seven or eight years ago. a chance meetin

merchants say it's far less than what far fewer merchants near the moscone center will get from interruptions caused by the international apec event last november. >> they were inconvenienced for a week. yeah, all i know that. so they ended up at $2.5 million of it. we ended up with $1 million of it. we've been inconvenienced for five years. yeah, well, i'm down 3 million bucks. >> i don't think that this was really worth it. i think it ended. up being a whole lot more money spent. there's not they're not going to regain the value for what they've put into it. >> an apologetic muni had this to say to the merchants. >> so at the same time that we are replacing the rail tracks on taraval, the sewer and water lines are also being replaced and those are things that take a long time for the sfpuc. >> instead, color of the new sewers and pipes equally responsible for the long delays, chose not to respond to ktvu inquiries. tom vacar ktvu of fox two news and turning now to our weather. >> here's a live look now at the bay bridge. you can see that there's mostly clear conditions today. just a little

many folks that she's had an opportunity to develop relationships with to the council of district merchants and so many of our communities. the glenn park community. food is a unify but your establishes in glenn park was something of an institution. it still is, the grand canyon -- did i not say that right? i think it's the grand canyon. the canyon market. which i loved going in there and talking to the people because many of the people that work for you and still work there, you know, they handle food and the community with such love and care. and that is a special thing to have especially in a big major city like san francisco. but more importantly, this body -- the mta, it's important that we have people who are on boards and commissions that have an understanding of what it feels like to run a small business in sphrbltion. that understands what it feels like when decisions get made and small businesses prosper because of those decisions. it's important that when those decisions get made that you have a voice of understanding, offer reason of experience as a small business owner at the f

nick valencia has more did you lie to ms merchant when you told her facts about mr. wade and ms willis's relationship >> cnn has obtained over 400 text messages that show this man, terrence bradley, was more deeply involved than previously known in advising the effort to disqualify fulton county district attorney fani willis. >> so as as an attorney yourself you are testifying here under oath that you had no idea what ms merchant was going to do with all the details that you are giving her about wade and willis's relationship? >> so at the time no, i did not. >> earlier this week on the witness, dan bradley, nathan wade's divorce attorney, repeatedly said he could not recall details about willis and nathan wade's relationship, but in text messages obtained by cnn just days before the allegations of a conflict of interests were initially filed in court. bradley told ashleigh merchant, the defense attorney for trump's co-defendant, that wade and willis were absolutely interrelationship before she hired him is this accurate merchant rights upon information and belief, w

some bikers like at the merchants along the corridor have complained the move which led to the removal of parking spaces and increased congestion has been devastating for businesses people just don't come anymore. people say, oh, >> i don't go to valencia anymore. tonight. well, the valencia quarter merchants association sent this letter to the sfmta. >> requesting the center bike lane be removed immediately. another group of merchants has taken the gloves off and filed claims against the city, which if tonight could lead to a lawsuit. i have lost my business. >> and dozens of other small business owners of either already been forced to shut down or on the verge of losing everything. the claims filed by 3 valencia street merchants call for the removal of the center bike lane and compensation for the businesses lost income. the claim contends the center bike lane violates not only the city's charter, which mandates the city protect the economic welfare of its businesses, but it violates valencia merchants, civil rights. we contend >> that the city would not have built the center bike la

but it also violates valencia merchants, civil rights.permanent infrastructure masquerading as a pilot program. >> we have never been attempted on union street, chestnut street or the civil case. these kinds of disasters projects treat the residents and business businesses of the mission district and other. and other lower-income neighborhoods as if they're expendable had a meeting tuesday. the sfmta indicated it's evaluating the project and is considering changes which could include moving the bike lanes closer to the curbs. again, the sfmta is discussing changes to the center bike lane. >> but at this point, no timeline for when those changes might happen again for many of the businesses along this corridor, change can't happen soon. enough in san francisco, dan kerman kron. 4 news. >> 2 men have been charged with the murder with murder in the deadly mass shooting at the kansas city chiefs super bowl. raleigh woman was killed more than 20 injured. many of them children. prosecutors say the 2 men were charged with second-degree murder am

ms merchant, any other witnesses? yes. i would call fani willis >> all right. ms cross, you and i am going to adapt and removed there's been now. lots of testimony from your ways. i don't believe that there can be a showing for the need for that for any to testify as for all of the reasons that were cited in the state's motion to quash initially tremendously high-burden know while opposing counsel, i don't believe it's the met particularly given the cumulative nature that would be the subject of personal detail. that is the way it's not testified why what do, you think you can establish and have through the testimony of ms willis and >> let me put me stop there. >> conflict in the up and stretch. now mr. wade has testified there's a conflict in multiple different on the first one is an embarrassment issue on the cash that would be the door so here's goal is testifying. >> well, what's what's the conflict there >> he testified that he didn't have receipts but we don't know who's willing so that i wanted so we don't we don't know. so there's no conflict. we just

for free with the obligation that the merchant must fulfill government orders, the army order, first the main one. the source of development is still the state, so this strengthening of serfdom is a huge problem that also needs to be discussed, because the main source of reforms is the tightening of serfdom, it did not begin under peter, the slavophiles were of course wrong here, they attributed to peter a sharp tightening of serfdom, it is a conciliar code, eternal enslavement, but of course it tightens these screws very tightly to the point that... .peasants, moreover, like the former black-growing peasants, that is, state peasants, they are now all state-owned, he is different, subgroups are leveled out, state peasants also do not have the right of free movement, he got drunk drunk, you ended up in a neighboring village on a drunken shop, you are forcibly expelled back and put on notice that maybe you tried to escape, how many disputes there were about whether it was possible or impossible to reform russia, so to speak, not as harshly as it was done peter. well, dashkova, for exam