the mesic industry has changed so much in the last two or three years, i wonder what the grammys arewhat do they mean for business whether of an artist, a label or spotify? adam: it is a great question. if you look over the last decades, the grammys has always been the best marketing event that the record label business has ever had. after the grammys, there is usually a bump of a 2-x to an 8-x on weekly sales of a single or an album. you will see that in the spotify charts this week, but i do not know what that will do for the music business. cory: spotify just let us know what happened with beck. that record, recording, album -- i am still struck with 20th-century nouns. adam: me too. cory: it shot up 524% overnight after winning record of the year. kanye west apparently helping a lot by dissing that win. why don't we break it down? for an artist whose music was the least listened to -- he was the surprise winner, sort of except that he was nominated. for someone who had the least listened to record -- spotify predicted beyonce would win, because she had the most downloads. that is

and my second question is is there anything in the budget related to base closures do mesically? >> so we are calling for a bipartisan effort to create another b.r.a.c. commission that would look for potential in the savings department successfully to make some hard decisions about where we locate our armed forces. >> thank you. and then my third question is dynamic scoring. so on the third day, i don't think this is a part san issue. as you know, the concept is we should take into account governmental changes and both democrats and republicans have supported the research and development tax credit because studies show that if you invest in r&d, you generate economic activity and eventually, that could pay for the credit itself. i think what makes rule change incredibly partisan is republicans only apply it to large tax expenditures and they ignore spending, nondiscretionary spending. does it make any sense to apply dynamic scoring to one part of the budget but not the rest of it? >> i think you've raised a very good point. whether it's an infrastructure, the investments in educa