has had several cases where criminal penalties were indirectly or directly involved from loving, mestruta, it is never suggested even when faced in the exact argument in 2b that the bar ought to be raised higher, but i will grant that in 2b, the court said it didn't need to address that, though it had never done that in any of its previous cases and just say look if this statute did that, if it did nothing more than to say to the attorney general, register them, you know, as reasonable, no requirements, no creation of the criminal offense, no fixing of the penalty. >> just and reasonable or in the public interest, would those be okay or not okay? >> i think as long as it's done the things it's did here, defined the elements, fixed the penalty, on the civil side it's said provided some standard like that in the statute the court's cases indicate that's enough. even if you think that's not enough, this statute does come inside of that. because this is not an agency just applying all of the real content or substance to a broad standard like public interest or just and reasonable. in the stat