let's go to ranld paul on meta- data bulk data collection. a big issue in the last year, year and a half. here's his claim. >> the invasion of your privacy did not stop one terrorist attack. i don't think -- >> reporter: did not stop one terrorist attack. you may remembered early on when bulk data was revealed by edward snowden, the administration talked about a least 50 terrorist attacks. that talking point disappeared over time through a lot of work and the president's own reform commission thought it not to be true. just one case of material case of terrorism was prevented. we jumg this to be a true claim by marco rubio. here's what marco rubio said tonight. >> if they're going to impose this on us. i have never supported cap and trade. >> reporter: never supported? let's look at his record in the state. in fact in twalgt he told a florida television station he believed it was inevitable and that florida should react to become an early complier. later they voted unanimously to pass that mandate. we judge this claim as false. final one. ben

the collection of this phone meta-data which is who you call comeau when you call, and how long you talkch can reveal a lot of information. should the government have that information the government can get it, go to aa judge and say that i believe that an is up to something. there is due process in place. john: a lot of people want to sue the government. the smiths have been so far. >> my name is peter smith. ten years ago there was a dragnet collection of call records which revealed detailed information about anna. how do we know whether those records were ever seized or searched? john: that was the appeals court judge asking you questions in your 2nd appearance and you await the decision. >> that is exactly right. we know that they are collecting the data. a subscriber on verizon wireless. >> i did because it is easy for me to talk to my client. john: you had a condition. >> i did. when the edward snowden case came to light i mentioned to my husband, i did not think that it was right that the government was able to collect my telephone data when i had not done anything wrong. i mentio

the collection of this phone meta-data which is who you call comeau when you call, and how long you talklot of information. should the government have that information the government can get it, go to aa judge and say that i believe that an is up to something. there is due process in place. john: a lot of people want to sue the government. the smiths have been so far. >> my name is peter smith. ten years ago there was a dragnet collection of call records which revealed detailed information about anna. how do we know whether those records were ever seized or searched? john: that was the appeals court judge asking you questions in your 2nd appearance and you await the decision. >> that is exactly right. we know that they are collecting the data. a subscriber on verizon wireless. >> i did because it is easy for me to talk to my client. john: you had a condition. >> i did. when the edward snowden case came to light i mentioned to my husband, i did not think that it was right that the government was able to collect my telephone data when i had not done anything wrong. i mentioned it, and late

they understand meta data. they understand our weaknesses. that's why they're sending people, they're hiding among the refugees. they understand those are sort of areas that police can't truly monitor very closely. they know where to find our weakness weaknesses. there's more places to get in in europe than the united states, if for no other reason than we have the atlantic ocean. >> bob, the indonesian military and police have a reputation for i guess in the past being quite brutal in their crackdowns. i know that we're just a few hours into this, but exactly what will play out for the next couple of days. the indonesian authorities and the military and police are concerned. >> they'll start rounding the kwushl suspects up. but you have to remember that indonesia is a sunni country and there's a great sympathy for sunni muslims in iraq and syria. they watch television, they watch what's happening there. they don't agree with the bombing of these places. they may not particularly like the islamic state, but there is a sympathy among a lot of

by using meta data using the vast resources that generated the internet. is one has piles of data every day. that is entirely responsible. everything they do can be recorded, played back, understood, analyzed, produce such a picture of your life it is incredible. from cradle to grave. there are examples of people that are now putting pictures of their unborn child on facebook. then you find baby photos. then first birthday and second and third and fourth birthday. the age of facebook is 60 but certainly people i know have children who are much younger on there. it is the thing to do. what happens over time? a detailed picture of someone's life. it is something a future employer, whether it be a government department or mainstream business, can analyze. they may not like certain things they see. like i said earlier, no one reaches this decision of being able to take it down because sometimes you can't. whether you want the employer to see the pictures of you dancing, or maybe doing something you should not do. maybe it is something benine. that is because yo

>> you know all these all the these groups that think they can go back and find these data, the meta data, whatever you call it. can someone please find these emails? could they be absolutely 100% destroyed? or are they sitting somewhere, either from a recipient, somewhere else. thousands that are sitting there. they have to be a smoking gun. >> the ones who showed us are atrocious, can you imagine what she won't show us? >> they're somewhere. >> and giuliani is talking about the jury instruction for consciousness of guilt. which you can ask for a judge to show when someone deliberately shows in a way that shows their guilt by destroying or not producing the evidence, because they know they're guilty and it would convict them. >> we're in the age of cyberterror. and cyberwarfare. dhont kind of disqualify her from that either her secretiveness or ignorance? >> the state department actually tried to protect her from herself. she wouldn't even listen then. because in 2011 there was an email sent to houma abe din, saying your boss must get an official account. so first of all the state depart

rubio's been attacks on him on the idea of who should collect the meta data and rubio goes out of hishich i respect rand paul for his positions on this, but let me tell you why, but there was actually the most fascinating part actually took place while we were at the start of the show and i was doing my two-thirds listen there and fox played a long clip of ted cruz during the immigration debate and about whether was it a poison pill or whether it wasn't. what made it fascinating was you didn't see them make other candidates clarify other things. cruz feels as if he is on the defensive tonight, sometimes from the moderators and sometimes from those on stage. >> and cruz is the one who more than anybody at stake on that iowa stage. this is the state he has to win. >> he does. he was making a plea. you probably saw at the beginning and he's not going to call it fly over country. he'll be in iowa in 2017. you can tell, something changed. this goes back to something i wanted to talk about in the first segment which is this idea of donald trump's effectiveness. he is -- anybody that has cau

data an american industries discovers many things. i was in a panel years ago with keith and we were talking about the meta center database. i understand why these dues want to do it. so you have -- >> right. >> unreal separation where the private industry takes it as a given you will do it this way. not so much. refugee, sure. their requirement to be stupid along with being generous. [laughter] >> my short summary would be that i would advise the chief executive to poke his finger and saying you, you make sure nothing bad happens. we can do both. we are talented. we've gotta lent at this. >> should we be worried about them? >> isn't it harder to get in? >> there is danger. we should be prudent about it. >> another example of overreaction in our country. >> look, first of all, the fact is i don't think that there was a couple of people with sir ape passports that came into europe that way. the fact of significance was that there was foreign terrorist fighters who were both citizens of other countries who had bought and been trained by isis and had european passports and were able to come any country. that's the more scary

this is what we call a meta analysis and these researchers looked at many other studies, many other reviews, they teased data really done with a good method and what they found was that in adolescents and children taking antidepressants there was a doubling this their risk of aggressive behavior and restlessness. really one of the first times that those two particular end points were studied in a cumulative manner like this. there can be flaws with the meth to go here so you have to take this with a grain of salt but it brings up what are the risks in this age group with this medication. >> so as a doctor, what do you tell parents in light of this new study if they have a child who is suffering. >> listen, it's a very complex decision-making process. i encourage people, think like a doctor. you want to ask four questions, what are the risks of taking this medication, what are the risks of not taking the medication then ask the flip side, what are the benefits and what are the benefits of taking or not taking the medication and have to factor in alternatives holistic approach and weigh that for the individual

data and american industry discovers many things. i was on a panel a year or two ago with keith alexander, and eric schmidt from google or quit talk about the innocent meta- database. eric which is going on said look, i understand why discuss what to do. you run powerful algorithms, establish relationships, learn this and that. on and on. keith and i look at one another and sent eric, you're right. we don't do that. the use of even that database was very narrowly circumscribed to simply query whether a known terrorist ever had a phone call that ended in the united states. so you've got this unreal separation with private industry takes as a given you do it this way. look, no, no. not so much. with regard refugees, sure, stupid along with being generous. my short summary would be simply that i would advise the chief executive to speak like and act like mother teresa, and before the meeting broke up, to grab whoever is so much are now, poli-sci, focusing the into his sternum and say you, you make sure nothing bad happens. we can do both. we are talented, we've got talent at this. >> should we be worried about them? >> there is a danger. we should be pruden

hear a little about the data we are collecting and the work charlie has been doggedly doing to put a structure in place that will tie together our schools, our families, our meta-systems, and our youth sport systems. i like to think of that as the four corners of a child's life, being able to make sure when an injury occurs, it affects all four corners. that information needs to be well communicated and coordinated so that youngsters are getting the best treatment they can. the law was built to try to identify the problem, typically by a nonmedical person or that is, the coach who may see something happen. so our efforts in the first year has been focused on how do we give coaches and information to recognize the injury and know that number to the a blow or head body jerks that individual in such a way, but with number two, brings along a change that youngster's function, as identified by going through a list of signs and symptoms, that youngster has to be pulled out of harms way and evaluated by a medical professional and they cannot return to that field of risk until they have been cleared by a medical professional to say that brain has recovered and is able

let's go to rand paul on meta data collection. this is a big issue for both parties.ere was his claim. >> the bulk collection of your phone data did not stop terrorist attack. >> did not stop one terrorist attack. you may remember when bulk data was revealed. that talking point actually disappeared over time from a lot of hard questioning, but even the president's own intelligence reform commission found it not to be true. just one case for material tert for terrorism that was prevented. we judge this was a true claim. marco rubio cap and trade. who're is what he said tonight about his record. >> if they're going to impose this on us, i have never supported cap and trade. >> never supported and never thought it was a good. let's look at his record in the state. in 2008 he said he believed cap and trade was inef able that and that florida should act quickly to become a complier. later he wanted to give them a man for cap and trade. later they voted to pass that man date. this is false. ben carson talking about government regulation. he made this claim about the number