relevant during the prop one conversation, getting information about how san francisco spends our mhsacause because we were the politicians, some of the politicians in this town, including myself, were big proponents of prop one, and prop one had two component s, one being a very large, amount of capital dollars for placements for people with severe mental illness. but the other piece was an implicit rebuke, i guess, to the counties in how they were spending their, prop $63 in a sense that those funds were really not getting used to tackle that really acute california wide need to make good on our commitments that we made when we started dismantling the mental institutions. and i don't feel like this plan that we have here rises to the challenge, and i understand that it is paperwork and that we have to get it done and that we're, you know, it's retrospective, but i don't quite understand why we weren't thinking about it in these terms. i mean, it's not like the world has changed dramatically over the past four years. i mean, it has in some ways, but in a lot of ways, the concerns arou