don't have additional questions, chair, for chief scott and sheriff miamoto. i know chief may have to leave in a little bit but if anyone has question for chief scott you may want to start with him first and a can talk about some of the amendments we're going to it make today to clarify the legislation. >> thank you. i do not have question for chief scott but appreciate the fact that both of these law enforcement agencies are working in the interest of san francisco and san franciscans because i realize that underneath this there are thorny concerns in the house of working people and with the deputy social services and police officers and the fact that you, supervisor safai and chief scott and sheriff miamoto were able to bridge that and the issues are noted and appreciated and i think constructive and great when we can work together and not let unfortunate issues get in the way and that did not happen here. well done, all three of you, and with that supervisors, mandelman or chan, any comments or questions. supervisor mandelman. >> thank you, chair peskin and

conversation forward and also the deputy sheriff's association for giving us feedback along with sheriff miamoto and police chief scott. we might expand the scope seeing what we have in other areas of the city. i know. this is something that i think we need to really get our arms around and i'm hopeful that this legislation today will be a deterrent and a suppressant and also something we can work with our district attorney on to get a level of treatment rehabilitation. this is not about going back to the days of overincarceration. this is about being present and being able to see the individuals and look at what the appropriate types of rehabilitation are. so, thank you, chair, thank you committee members. thank you supervisor mandelman and your cosponsors and thank you supervisor chan for the amendments last week and many other supervisors have expressed their support for this legislation as well. so thank you, mr. chair. >> chairman: thank you. any comments from committee members. if not, why don't we go to public comment. >> clerk: yes. mr. chair, operations is checking to see if there are a