they should have named him now mianyang i think it's only china who. we see in a he's not just a technology issue it's not just environment issue it's a threat to the community's right to decide their own future. they are willing to corrupt a lot of values in society by imposing react to risk and less production but they refused to accept that the long term legacy of either health impacts or of risk from the nuclear was the result from that production. where they destroyed a sacred place to type stuff. then now they're going to be destroying that the sacred place will put this poison in place thanks to put the stock back into. i don't want to do it daily in the end the least they've used to cool my code one thousand. times. an example of how little australia has learnt over the last fifty years for the maryland good experience is that today i'm on uprights at beverly where a general atomics the multi-billion dollar u.s. nuclear corp upright senescent in-situ lecture anyone esle in situ leaks as a method that's never been approved in any other o.e.c.d.