michael brooks has the best explanation on how we should look at this situation. host: johnny is next, a republican in kentucky. caller: i think the problem we have is iran. all this is coming from iran. we should bomb iran, blow up the oil fields, burn their oilfields, shut down the oil industry, bomb their nuclear sites, bomb the uranium arrangement plant, -- enrichment plant, and completely shut them down. i would like to have my congressman -- i would like to have his phone number. i like to bring up a vote on the house floor to expel rashida to leave -- she did to leave -- rashida tlaib and l had omar. -- ilhan omar. we need to attack iran and shut them down and cut down -- cut off the oil they are getting from iran so they cannot -- cut off their oil. host: we got that point. bill is an independent in texas. caller: good morning. this is the first opportunity i have had to talk to you. i think you do a good job. i would like for somebody to tell me something. about a week ago, i watched -- she said we must stand by israel. why? i would like to know, what has

michael brooks has the best explanation on how we should look at this situation.ost: johnny is next, a republican in kentucky. caller: i think the problem we have is iran. all this is coming from iran. we should bomb iran, blow up the oil fields, burn their oilfields, shut down the oil industry, bomb their nuclear sites, bomb the uranium arrangement plant, -- enrichment plant, and completely shut them down. i would like to have my congressman -- i would like to have his phone number. i like to bring up a vote on the house floor to expel rashida to leave -- she did to leave -- rashida tlaib and l had omar. -- ilhan omar. we need to attack iran and shut them down and cut down -- cut off the oil they are getting from iran so they cannot -- cut off their oil. host: we got that point. bill is an independent in texas. caller: good morning. this is the first opportunity i have had to talk to you. i think you do a good job. i would like for somebody to tell me something. about a week ago, i watched -- she said we must stand by israel. why? i would like to know, what has i

are usually with you agree, to find out if this is so, we go to texas to visit the psychiatrist michael brooksith the help of artificial intelligence of deceased loved ones. the psychiatrist believes that a romantic relationship with a gadget is the answer to the epidemic of loneliness. in the future, people will be able to have sexual intimacy with their computers. you could make scarlett johansson your ai girlfriend if scarlett agrees to license her personality for such purposes, but now celebrity images are used by anyone without consent, with the help of deepfey technology you can send leonardo dicario on a walk around moscow. mom, make someone lie, eh someone to finally tell the truth, we just want. use you to share all information about yourself for free. the other day, tom hanks published a warning: i did not star in an advertisement for a dental clinic , which you could see on social networks, the video was quickly deleted, but if you dream up using a deepfake, then the confrontation between hanks and new technologies can be imagined like this, a calendar, a dentist at 9: 30, open the

michael. have them from the brookings institution. thank you. know, relatives of german citizens being held hostage by hamas said they are desperate for any information about their loved ones. the gentleman for him and his time leading a bad bulk met several of the families and his tribe. she also visited the site of the hospital, could attract but to several australia. it's arriving in israel and letting it be about heated to see him off as destruction for himself. we are standing alongside who is really count about the p a survey, the splice and home near the guys opposed to 3 people died here after it was hit by home us rockets. a bare bones trip is a show of solidarity with israel and the optimize of the attacks. visiting a crisis seem to she condemned how most adaptive support israel with what ever it needs. in this horrible days, we the people of germany, a spending with you. we're feeling with you we all ease re lease the space. so i would like to convey our deepest solidarity from the government of germany, but also from the people of ge

usually agree with you, to find out if this is true, let's go to texas, visiting psychiatrist michael brookstrist considers romantic. with with your computers, you can get an avatar of some celebrity, you could make scarlett johansson your girlfriend with artificial intelligence, if scarlett agrees to license her personality for such purposes, but now celebrity images are used by anyone without consent, with the help of technology you can take you for a walk. make someone lie and someone finally tell the truth, we just want to use you to share all the information about yourself for free, one of these days tom hanks published a warning: i did not star in the commercial for a dental clinic, which you could see on social networks, the video was quickly deleted, but if you get creative with the help of a deepfake, then the confrontation between hanks and new technologies can be done at 9:30, open the door, open the door, second tooth we'll do it after lunch, wrong command, please repeat, i'll open the door, at the same time , artificial intelligence opens up limitless opportunities for film comp

for that analysis, michael had mentioned the brookings institution. thank you. let's take a quick look at some of the new was concerning the conflict. miss stuckey has the gone sending her mind at an age intended for gossip to doctor sheriff. both fans have brought food and medical supplies into egypt that a file border crossing is in southern got size, the only point what age can be delivered. and artillery strike has killed a drawn list of injured 6 of those in southern lebanon. if some of the low appears roy tubs, newer version c, was covered in cash as on the border with, instead of doing this extra generally, i'm doing a good data. one. the attack highlights the risk of the conflict spelling of a gentleman president. time for this time, i called for the fall of data team, would choose during a visit to a synagogue and berlin. he said, the state must protect church life off to the mazda service group. or violence against jewish communities. steinman said he'd have presents the whole nation at the side of all the tools in germany. vs the us actually goes to i

host: michael hanlon with the brookings institution, we appreciate your time.k you, kindly. host: when we come back, james jacoby will be with us. he will talk about a new documentary called elon musk, twitter take over. we will be right back. ♪ >> nonfiction book lovers, c-span has a number of podcasts for you. listen to best-selling nonfiction authors and influential interviewers on the afterwords podcast and on q&a here wide-ranging conversations with authors were making things happen. footnotes plus episodes are a weeklong conversation that feature fascinating authors of nonfiction books and a wide variety of topics. and the about books podcast takes you behind the scenes of the nonfiction book publishing industry with insider interviews, industry updates and bestsellers list. find all of our podcast by downloading the free c-span now app or where you get your podcasts and on our website, c-span.org/podcasts. >> next monday, what she spent series in partnership with the library of congress, books that shaped america. we will feature the common law by oliver

it features 13 songs including michael buble, cindy lauper and ot [ relaxing music ] >> brooke: this is what we needed. >> ridge: it is. why did we leave the house? >> brooke: i don't know.

host: on your screen, michael o'hanlon, research and foreign policy program director at the brookings institute, here to talk about the israel-hamas conflict. guest: the scope is horrible. really it is historically unprecedented, at least for a half-century in terms of israeli casualties and in terms of the sense of existential fear within israel about what is happening and what could happen in the future, especially as hezbollah remains in a state of uncertainty to the north, inside lebanon. hezbollah being an extremist group that is also part of the lebanese government, also armed by iran. hamas bei the more sunni group sociated with the gaza strip in particular and has been effectively running that stri of land along the mediterranean for about 15 years. hamas carried out the attacks on saturday, which have been likened to israel's 9/11. israel lost maybe 700 people out of 10 million, whereas we had lost 3000 out of 300 million on that 11 -- not to compare too much but just to give a sense of the scale and scope. now israel has a problem of a magnitude it has not had in a while wit

let's cross live now to michael 0'hanlon, director of research foreign policy at the brooking institutionhink we are now? we are clearly at a turning point, because we are all waiting with bated breath about the ground operation. it's not clear what it will amount to. what comes next? 0n will amount to. what comes next? on top of all that, it's the humanitarian intervention that you are importantly discussing. i think it's a possibility that israel, which did not have a plan for occupying gaza prior to october seven this year, may wind—up... israel should do a number of ground insurgents allowing humanitarian relief and wait for the world community to propose a political endgame, which might involve the when trusteeship. for israel, the goal is to make sure hamas does not remain in power. and also, seek retaliation for the high—power perpetrators of the attack. i don't think israel needs to literally destroy hamas, nor do i think they should given the implication to do so for the propagation of gaza. i think it's time to get ahead and think it's time to get ahead and think about that poli

so it's a great study and we see in this research work, it's a brookings institution working paper and the hutchins center with michael bauer and erica's co-authors. we are looking at the stock market responds to events where the probability of climate policy went to essentially zero it jumps to essentially one. looking at both the broad indexes and individual firms and you really see the green affirms, it of low-carbon firms and the low emissions firms measured in terms of emission intensity or a rating agency that the greener firms really did much better when the ira was announced. that was a huge jump in relative value,e relative certainly to more carbon-intensive firms. >> you don't expect that. >> you might expect outside if that's what you're looking for but i think it's an early indication that disasters are expected to have important effects in terms of profitability with these firms. you can do a cost channel where the investment was subsidized or demand channel where there clean energy products were being used for instance for the cost channel and demand channel. makes perfect sense in terms of the pricing p

. >> michael, thank you very much for joining us from the brookings institution. >>> and also wanted to highlight some of the companies we've been covering here on c natinbc seei donations. jeffries announcing that it will donate $13 million to ten charities providing aid. and oracle donating $1 million to israel's emergency medical service group and pledging to double funds raised by employees. seeing actions from sdidisney, citigroup and more joining the list announcing donations for israel. and humanitarian crisis there. >> let's hope the list gets longer. >>> meantime wells fargo getting a nice bump as earning beat the street to benefit from higher rates offsetting slower lending activity. we'll talk to the cfo later this hour. ( ♪ ♪ ) ♪ (when the day that) ♪ ♪ (lies ahead of me) ♪ ♪ ( seems impossible to face) ♪ ♪ (a lovely day) ♪ ♪ (lovely day) ♪ ♪ (lovely day) ♪ ♪ (lovely day) ♪ a bank that knows your business grows your business. bmo. hi, my name is damion clark. and if you have both medicare and medicaid, i have some really encouraging news that you'll definitely want to hea

michael: i love the question. my colleague when i started at brookings 30 years ago attempted to do what you pointed out in the last book he wrote. it was after the cold war had ended so he tried to adapt a little bit to the new world at that point. china had not risen the way it has now. i was glad he did it and i've repeated his percentages in my own book, defense 101, that i proceed to talk about why it is so hard to answer the question on the terms you just requested because the forces we have abroad, the $1.3 million u.s. military -- 1.3 million u.s. active-duty. about 200,000 are brought on any given day. there in japan, korea, germany, poland, and that countries in the middle east. then there is a few hundred here, a couple thousand there, places like australia, singapore, the netherlands. most of those 200,000 do not cost us more to have abroad than they do if we had kept them at home. the allies pay for a lot of the cost. the cost to us is less than 10% from the cost of a unit or person. it is not the basis abroad, it is the fact we have these commitments. worse in the event of crisis or conflict. then you

michael: i love the question. my colleague when i started at brookings 30 years ago attempted to do what you pointed out in the last book he wrote. it was after the cold war had ended so he tried to adapt a little bit to the new world at that point. china had not risen the way it has now. i was glad he did it and i've repeated his percentages in my own book, defense 101, that i proceed to talk about why it is so hard to answer the question on the terms you just requested because the forces we have abroad, the $1.3 million u.s. military -- 1.3 million u.s. active-duty. about 200,000 are brought on any given day. there in japan, korea, germa ....ny , .... ... .... .... ...... 10% from the cost of a unit or person. it is not the basis abroad, it is the fact we have these commitments. worse in the event of crisis or conflict. then you can start asking if we do not have a commitment to south korea, which is a geographically challenging place to defend for a four, mental power. and we had this debate in 1950 whether we should try to defend south korea stop we decided know until the day north korea invaded. it was a compl

well, a really enlightening email from michael who says , hi, email from michael who says, hi, mark. mel brooksn which jewish people were singing whilst being tortured in the spanish inquisition . monty the spanish inquisition. monty python did parody of the python did a parody of the crucifixion with a song and dance routine. i'm sure there are very few jewish people or christians who would be offended by these un—pc scenes , as by these un—pc scenes, as britain is great with having written the magna carta, the works of shakespeare and the engush works of shakespeare and the english translation of the bible. and for all of the non—pc comedy that influenced the vaudeville of america . so and vaudeville of america. so and a great line to finish the email bad guys of all sorts are afraid of being laughed at. well, what a great, great and articulate email that was. it's time now for this . it is 1030 and so it's for this. it is 1030 and so it's time for tomorrow's front pages , 1031, by the way, for the pedants out there, the education ministry keeps secret files on critics of school policy . crit

michael? >> indeed. thank you for your reporting. >>> this is a senior fellow, director of research in foreign policy with of the brookings institution. he joins me from the bethesda, maryland. it's good to see you. what is your assessment of what happens next? a specter of a ground invasion along with this israeli order with the evacuation of gaza city which on its face is the extraordinary request? >> it is extraordinary, michael. and i do not think it will be complied with. i doubt israel expected that. it goes to show the awareness of the difficulty of what is coming. and, frankly, the horror of what is coming. this is going to be unlike anything else. 15 or 16 or 17 years ago, israel decided that he did not want to be part of gaza anymore. it just got out. and, it tolerated hamas coming to power because the alternative was for israel to try to rule this place. and that was something that israel did not want. and, for 15 years, it sort of worked. right? the two sides decided to occasionally oppose each other, there were some instances of violence in 2014, there was a limited sense of incursions. for the most part it was live and