i am michael brune, executive director of the sierra club. the sierra club and the more than 2 million people that submitted comments know the pipeline isn't in the national interest. it would cut through more than a thousand miles of american farms and ranches with oil that is more toxing, corrosive, carbon intensive and built to clean up than conventional oil, all the way to the gulf with most of it would be exported. like many of you, i am a parent. and i am concerned about the world we are leaving for our children. one lesson my wife and i try to teach our kids is the need to need to set goals and stay focuses to achieve them. our country has a science-based goal to limit pollution, we must keep in mind that achieving that goal is not compatible with this pipeline. none of the scenario show how keystone xl could be built in a way that ensures the nation will meet those goals. in fact, it would increase climate pollution with the development of tar sands in alberta that you see here. a report from carbon tracker found that keystone xl woul

i am michael brune of the sierra club. more than 2 million people submit comments last week the state department who know this pipeline is not in our interest. the keystone xl pipeline that cut through more than a thousand miles of american and ranches, carrying oil that is more toxic, more corrosive, more carbon intensive and more difficult to clean up the conventional oil out of the typical for most of it would be exported. like many of you, i am a parent in it deeply concerned about the world we are the poorer children. what lesson my wife and i try to teach our kids is the need to set goals and to stay focused as they strive to achieve them. our country has a clear science-based gold to limit carbon pollution. we must keep this in mind of recognizing achieving the goal is incompatible with permitting the pipeline. none of the scenarios in the state department's analysis show how keystone xl can be built in a way that shows our nation can meet those goals. in fact, keystone xl is significantly exacerbate climate polluti

i am i am michael brune executive director of the sierra club. the more than 2 billion people is submitted comments to the state department know that this pipeline is not in our national interests. the keystone xl tar sands pipeline would cut through more than a thousand miles of american farms and ranches carrying oil that is more toxic, more corrosive more carbon-intensive and more difficult to clean up the good national oil all the way to the gulf where most of it will be exported. many of you i'm a parent and i'm deeply concerned about the world we are leaving for our children. one lesson my wife and i try to teach our kids is the need to set goals and to stay focused as they strive to achieve them. our country has a clear science-based school to limit carbon pollution. we must keep this in mind and recognized in achieving that goal it's incompatible with permitting this pipeline. none of the scenarios in the state department's analysis show how keystone xl could be built in a way that ensures our nation can meet those climate goals. in fact

i'm michael brune, executive director of the sierra club. the sierra club and more than two million people who submitted comments last week to the state department know that this pipeline is not in our national interest. the keystone x.l. tar sands pipeline would cut through more than 1,000 miles of american farms and ranches, carrying oil that is more toxic, more corrosive, more carbon intensive, and more difficult to clean up than conventional oil. all the way to the gulf where most of it would be exported. like many of you, i'm a parent. and i'm deeply concerned about the world we are leaving for our children. one lesson my wife and i try to teach our kids is the need to set goals and stay focused as they strife to achieve them. our country has a clear, science-based goal to limit carbon pollution. we must keep this in mind in recognizing that achieving that goal is incompatible with permitting this pipeline. none of the scenarios in the state department's analysis show how keystone x.l. could be built in way that ensures our nation can m

i'm michael brune, executive director of the sierra club. the sierra club and more than two million people who submitted comments last week to the state department know that this pipeline is not in our national interest. the keystone x.l. tar sands pipeline would cut through more than 1,000 miles of american farms and ranches, carrying oil that is more toxic, more corrosive, more carbon intensive, and more difficult to clean up than conventional oil. all the way to the gulf where most of it would be exported. like many of you, i'm a parent. and i'm deeply concerned about the world we are leaving for our children. one lesson my wife and i try to teach our kids is the need to set goals and stay focused as they strife to achieve them. our country has a clear, science-based goal to limit carbon pollution. we must keep this in mind in recognizing that achieving that goal is incompatible with permitting this pipeline. none of the scenarios in the state department's analysis show how keystone x.l. could be built in way that ensures our nation can m