clayton, north carolina this morning. this subject, we have about half an hour to talk about it. plenty of comments on facebook and twitter. you can e-mail us, journal@c-span.org. michaels in bellevue, ohio on our line for democrats. good morning. we lost michael, randy in illinois, independent. good morning. caller: good morning. theuld like to say that long-term -- i would have to say -- it is a good thing. i would like to see it go from six months to a year. in my situation, i did have a job, i did find a job, i was there for three months, i am a 61-year-old gentleman. they said that the older generation is having a harder time because of their age. when i was there for three months, the company had an option to give me insurance or let me go, they decided to let me go so they would not have to give me insurance. i believe in the long term insurance, i would say between one year and six months. that is my opinion on the long-term insurance. host: thank you for calling from illinois. i appreciate it. the question was posed by post-crescent newspaper in wisconsin. from appleton. sufficient for unemployment benefits. a tough question and today's culture. i cannot even