michael silverleaf again? >> i am not aware and, again, i was not involved directly in the max clifford settlement. >> could thec's opinion? >> we can certainly write to the committee with what details are appropriate around arrangements with mr. clifford. i am happy to do that. >> just again on the basis of what the company knew -- having given a strident defense just days beforehand -- who knew it and when they knew it, would you consider a request from the committee that, if there is a qc's opinion, suitably redacted, and no doubt after checking with mr. clifford, to preserve any personal details, it might be released to us, as the silverleaf opinion has already been released to us? >> in general, mr. farrelly, it is probably wise not to go down the path of routinely waiving privilege on legal advice around matters of litigation, matters involving individuals and matters involving the company. as i have said, i am happy to go back to counsel and to the company and say, "what can we provide with respect to details around the mr. clifford arrangements?" i am happy to write to you on that basis, but i do not wa