this goes to michael harrington's question. if an industry really system of a free enterprise system is a system in which the poor or ground beneath the heels of these rapacious industrialists worried about how would he explain the success in hong kong, the extent to which people continue to vote with their feet to go there? you're not asking to make of the united states one gigantic hong kong or sweatshop or whatever you want to call it. you're you would acknowledge that that there is a historic development of an economy and what may be right one stage in the development of an economy may not be right for another stage isn't the issue where do we go here? what what pragmatic decisions do we make about the direction of the american economy? should it be toward more and more? or should it be trying to preserve an adequate balance between, freedom of choice and government? again, the problem is to distinguish two things. this comes back to an earlier the circumstances terms of the physical arrangements and the circumstances in te

this goes to michael harrington's question. of a free enterprise system is a system in which the poor are ground beneath the heels of the rapacious industrialists, he's talking about. how are people going to hong kong and vote with their feet to go there. >> you're not ask to make of the united states one gigantic hong kong or a sweatshop or whatever you want to call it. you'd acknowledge that there is historical development of an economy and what may be right for one stage in the development of an economy may not be right for another stage. isn't the issue, where do we go from here? what pragmatic decisions do we make about the direction of the american economy? should it be toward more and more government or trying to preserve an adequate balance between freedom of choice and government intervention? >> again, the problem is to distinguish two things, this comes back to an earlier comment, the circumstances in terms of the physical arrangements. and the circumstances in terms of the rules that guide the society. now, in the c

this goes to michael harrington's question. if an industry really system of a free enterprise system is a system in which the poor or ground beneath the heels of these rapacious industrialists worried about how would he explain the success in hong kong, the extent to which people continue to vote with their feet to go there? you're not asking to make of the united states one gigantic hong kong or sweatshop or whatever you want to call it. you're you would acknowledge that that there is a historic development of an economy and what may be right one stage in the development of an economy may not be right for another stage isn't the issue where do we go here? what what pragmatic decisions do we make about the direction of the american economy? should it be toward more and more? or should it be trying to preserve an adequate balance between, freedom of choice and government? again, the problem is to distinguish two things. this comes back to an earlier the circumstances terms of the physical arrangements and the circumstances in te

this goes to michael harrington's question. if the system of the free enterprise system is in which the poor are ground beneath the heels of the rapacious and industrialists he's worried about, how would he explain the success in hong kong the extent to which people continue to vote to go there. there is a historical development of the economy and what may be right for one stage in the development of the economy may not be right for another stage. what pragmatic decisions do we make about the direction of the american economy? should it be towards more and more government or trying to are trying to preserve an adequate balance between freedom of choice. the circumstances in terms of the physical arrangement and the circumstances in terms of the rules that guide the society. now in the case of hong kong, of course to the density of populations such as hong kong, it is a marvelous example just because of the circumstances. andd the people in hong kong would love to get into the less crowded circumstances if people would let them