john said ladies trilogy, advisors, bar, pentagon official, michael maloof, thank you both for stepping in to the big picture. come on, i remember how, after 911, we were all on the same page. we felt that again, when the pandemic shut down 1st, what happened? this is the big picture on our t america. ah, the just look at what's beyond the ability to repair and that's what american policymakers are playing with the justification for more money printing. because if climate change were possible to 6 climate change, it was for the entire global economy down to the point where these bankers would stop getting bailouts and they can't ever stop the bodies. so that's, that's the rhetoric behind and that's the methodology behind it. that's the psychosis ah, remember this one? that was new york city. it's 7 pm every night, like clockwork when the shut down 1st hit and when self quarantined, city folk saluted 1st responders and to each other. they bang pots and pans, some sang the national anthem, or played it on various instruments. back then we were all in this together. and you remember this p

michael maloof also suspects the u. s. didn't see russia in china's move coming. when you consider that, since the disasters pull out of afghanistan, the united states is once again been trying to agitate both on the on the western front, with, with nato and in the black sea area. and now in the, in the pacific, somehow to try and rectify it's abysmal failure. and after 20 years and ask dana, stan, and i'm afraid that the united states is beginning to overreact and, and you cannot blame russia and china now to decide to band together. and deal with this constant irritant. i think that it is, it is a surprise, somewhat to washington, that the 2 have united and all that they're doing really is looking back on the good old days of the cold war when soviet union and, and china even though they were aligned with one another somewhat, there was an ability to play one off against the other. that's not going to happen today. or just about the headlines for you in a brief here. what are you into national that protest swept turkey. it's off to the national currency, crashed

i'm joined by my guess, michael maloof in washington. he is a former pentagon senior security policy analyst in london. we have andre walker. he has a political commentator in commerce and in edinburgh. we cross to john white, he is a writer and political commentator. i gentleman cross hoc rolls in effect. that means he can jump at any time you want, and i always appreciate, let me go to michael 1st in washington. let me quote, the high commissioner for foreign and security affairs i, joseph brow, quote. europe cannot afford to be a bystander in a world order that is mainly shaped by others. why is he saying this now? that's been the case since 1945. i mean that he's suddenly having to pickney go ahead and d c. yeah, i think that what, what berella seeing is the reality of the, of the lack of us leadership and nato on the one hand. and so, and you have, and you have my crawl from a france who's also pushing for a and e, you army seeing the same thing because they can no longer trust us leadership. but frankly, they don't need us leadersh

unless you live now to form a pentagon security analysts, michael maloof, welcome back to i'd say, how do you think washington's going to be viewing this growing military closeness between moscow and beijing? well, they shouldn't be surprised at all. when you consider that, since the disasters pull out of afghanistan, the united states as once again, been trying to agitate on the, on the western front with, with nato and in the black sea area. and now in the, in the pacific, somehow to try and rectify it's abysmal failure in after 20 years, an afghan to stand. and i'm afraid that the united states is beginning to overreact and, and you cannot blame russia and china now, which is actually had some closeness, military closer requite some time to decide to band together and deal with this constant. irritant. this is a, this is a political issue for the united states to continue agitating where, where it's not necessary. and i think that it's going to begin to have some, a negative repercussions on us policy. us policy was such a failure in afghanistan. how do we expect us policy to succee

and we discussed this with a former pentagon analyst, michael maloof, who says the aggressive us options in the pacific approving counter productive. when you consider that since the disastrous pull out of afghanistan, the united states has, once again been trying to agitate on the on the western front with, with nato in the black sea area. and now with the indo pacific, somehow to try and rectify its abysmal failure in after 20 years enough to understand. and i'm afraid that the united states is beginning to overreact and, and you cannot blame russia and china now to decide to band together and deal with this constant irritant. i think that it is, it is a surprise, somewhat to washington, that the 2 have united and all that they're doing really is looking back on the good old days of the cold war when the soviet union and china. and even though they were aligned with one of the other somewhat, there was an ability to play one off against the other. that's not going to happen today. all right, let's get some other news and brief for you here on the program. as we understand protests have

ah, cross sucking european security, i'm joined by my guess, michael maloof in washington. he is a former pentagon senior security policy analyst in london. we have under a walker. he has a political commentator in commerce and in edinburgh. we cross to john white, he is a writer and political commentator. i gentleman crosswalk, rules and effect. that means he can jump in any time you want and i always appreciate, let me go to my.