we'll be right back with michael moore. do you agree, by the way, with the president's decision to send more troops to afghanistan? tell us what you think at cnn.com/larryking. we'll be right back. advil liqui-gels you're taking the pain reliever that works faster on tough pain than tylenol rapid release gels. and not only faster. stronger, too. relief doesn't get any better than this. advil. bonus on every single purchase. what you do with it is up to you. what will you get back with your cash back? it pays to discover. >>> as commander in chief, i have determined that it is in our vital national interest to send an additional 30,000 u.s. troops to afghanistan. after 18 months, our troops will begin to come home. these are the resources we need to seize the initiative while building the afghan capacity that can allow for a responsible transition of our forces out of afghanistan. >> larry: michael moore, it's pretty certain, isn't it, if we left, as you wanted to say, you think we should do, the taliban is going to come rig

than their elders, but they think social security ought to be addressed, they would not say as michael mooreid that it was a fictitious war in iraq. this young generation, the millennials, we call them, they went early for this guy and they got him elected. sometimes -- when i was young, they said do not trust anybody over 30. finally that came true. these young people did not trust us, and they elected this guy. it added to his appeal because it was a break from the past due but i do not think these kids felt guilty. host: back to the phones. miami gardens, florida, mitch, on the line for democrats. caller: we mentioned defining moments, and we had the speakers of this eight and our age, and then when we compare speakers of the past. to bring it home, defining moments, compared to joseph saving israel and other nations that were saved, despite the lack of food. we take that region, now we take the region of the united states, which was nominally controlled by the indians. england had a problem. all of the explorers can then, did not seize the opportunity -- came in, did not seize the opport

than their elders, but they think social security ought to be addressed, they would not say as michael mooredid that it was a fictitious war in iraq. this young generation, the millennials, we call them, they went early for this guy and they got him elected. sometimes -- when i was young, they said do not trust anybody over 30. finally that came true. these young people did not trust us, and they elected this guy. it added to his appeal because it was a break from the past due but i do not think these kids felt guilty. host: back to the phones. miami gardens, florida, mitch, on the line for democrats. caller: we mentioned defining moments, and we had the speakers of this eight and our age, and then when we compare speakers of the past. to bring it home, defining moments, compared to joseph saving israel and other nations that were saved, despite the lack of food. we take that region, now we take the region of the united states, which was nominally controlled by the indians. england had a problem. all of the explorers can then, did not seize the opportunity -- came in, did not seize the oppor

i watcheds iicko"and it was kind of disheartening when michael moore -- i watched "sixcko." and went to do a different election. it is not about health care. this is just the beginning of how we do business in america there when they refinanced gm a while back, they had an ad that was out about how they will restructured gm and how they will do things differently going forward. the health care is the beginning of how they will start doing that all of our businesses hemorrhage money to a certain set of people in this country. we are -- economically through the money. if you trace -- what they're doing, if you trace where it is going to or who it keeps to be on top that goes along those same party lines as far as you see the politicians fighting to keep the things going. expos those people for the money they are receiving and then you can get rid of the problem. host: if you go to sideburn news -- cybernews.com -- bart stupak, as as white house and leadership in house of representatives have been pressuring him not to speak out about the compromise abortion language in the sen

newt gingrich, nancy pelosi, the republicans, the democrats, the greedy contractors, the unions, michael moorerush limbaugh. who's to blame? it's a natural question to ask. but is it the right question to ask? whenever something goes wrong, the natural tendency is to find someone to blame. all you need to do is go visit a local book store and go into the current events section. it's filled with villains. >> i wanted to appear on the cover of the book in short mini-dresses. but there's always the paperback version. so instead of who's to blame, we asked the question why do some big initiatives fail and why do some succeed? to answer that question, we studied more than 75 major undertakings since world war ii to look for both great successes and monumental failures. we looked at everything from the success of the marshall plan to the struggles of immigration reform. we looked at the wars on poverty, the wars on inflation, to real wars in iraq and vietnam. now, when we began this task of reviewing all of these initiatives, we realized that to do it right would require a small army of intelligent,

it was disheartening to see how michael moore's showed how the people down their offer them health careork that out. but why take a different direction here. this is not about health care. this is just the beginning of how we do business in america. when we refinanced gm a while back, there were talking about how they would restructure gm and do things differently. the health care industry is just at the beginning of how they are going to start doing that. all of our businesses hemorrhaged money to aÑixd certn number of people in this country. whoever is on top, and then as people at the bottom. you trace where that money is going to and who is up on top, and the party lines when the city's politicians fight to see where they're going. the money that they are receiving and then you get at the root of the problem. host: thank you for the call. if you go to cns.com, there is a part about the arts to peck bart -- there is a story about bart stupak. a quote from him -- they think i should not be expressing my views on this bill until they show me the language. i do not need anyone dead tell

if you watch michael moore's "sicko," it portrayed france as an unmitigated paradise and the doctors a nice living. well, that's too much of a gloss of what happens there. but french doctors don't generally get compensated on the super high level but they seem happy. part of the reason is they don't have malpractice there because there isn't a big civil lawsuit kind of system as we have here in america and i would not advocate that for us. guest: the cost is reflected in the cost of care and salaries. again, we can't exactly have that system here. host: new york on our democrats' line. caller: i work as a teacher and my health care costs many thousands of dollars for both myself. you mentioned that in france you pay through the nose in taxes for the coverage we get. if we switch that off and you are married to a french woman, how do you get that coverage? and what does she pay? guest: most of her salary comes from france. she is a journalist and works for european publications, so that money is taxed on the front end. french taxes. this is the only way in which we benefit from paying