there's a michael morton case, which shows everybody. michael morton was convicted and served 25 years for killing his wife. this was down in texas. the reason this happened, or one of the reasons it happened, was the prosecutor hid evidence. it was evidence of another man lurking out there that came from the victim's son. the prosecution hid the evidence. now this was before dna came along and when dna came along, morton said, look i would like to have some of the evidence tested because of blood splatter and semen, some dna evidence that could be tested, and said i would like to be tested because i know i'm innocent, i will be cleared. ken anderson, by that time a state judge, importuned the current dna not allow testing go forward. he did not want to have michael morton exonerated because he knew it would reflect badly on him and he would be revealed. it took six years of the court of texas to get the evidence that exonerated michael mortgage. what happened at that point discovered dna pointed to norwood. norwood was tried and convict

he did not want to have michael morton exonerated because he knew it would reflect badly onp him and he would be revealed. it took six years of the court of texas to get the evidence that exonerated michael mortgage. what happened at that point discovered dna pointed to norwood. norwood was tried and convicted. the tragedy is while michael morton is in prison convicted of killing his wife, another murder happens in the neighborhood. now norton -- norwood has been charged with that crime. case is pending, i don't want to say anything more about it because it's a pending prosecution. let me just say, there's now very strong suspicion that norwood committed this other murder and the police and the prosecutor had not hidden the evidence and had not focused on michael morton to exclusion of anybody else, it is entirely possible that woman would still be alive today. let's talk about the scooter libby case here. it's another way in which prosecutors can overreach. scooter libby convicted based on information of a phone call that happened four years earlier, disputes, woman on the other end

there's a michael morton case, which shows everybody. michael morton was convicted and served 25 years for killing his wife. this was down in texas. the reason this happened, or one of the reasons it happened, was the prosecutor hid evidence. it was evidence of another man lurking out there that came from the victim's son. the prosecution hid the evidence. now this was before dna came along and when dna came along, morton said, look i would like to have some of the evidence tested because of blood splatter and semen, some dna evidence that could be tested, and said i would like to be tested because i know i'm innocent, i will be cleared. ken anderson, by that time a state judge, importuned the current dna not allow testing go forward. he did not want to have michael morton exonerated because he knew it would reflect badly on him and he would be revealed. it took six years of the court of texas to get the evidence that exonerated michael mortgage. what happened at that point discovered dna pointed to norwood.nogage. what happened at that