michael neufeld is a name on this list, i wasn't familiar, who was michael neufeld and why is that significant i think he still in the trump administration, from what i understand, which also raises -- how many of the people -- look over there are some names that are on that list that i would note it's not surprising that they be engaged in unmasking. if the political people that you're surprised by, but you'd also want to know, are any of them still in the administration? are any of them perhaps still people that we should look at and wonder what their role was in this? which seems to be a conspiracy. we are not conspiracy theorists, we have unveiled a conspiracy, that's of the document -- god bless rick richard grenell, that's what it shows. >> tucker: a completely lightweight political figure and if you think she's a serious person, talk to her for 10 minutes. the fact that she would have access to this is -- by the way, i think he's in treasury now, maybe it's a different michael neufeld. i don't know, but it seems like maybe his, but we will find out. great to see you tonight, thank you.

neufeld with the u.s. treasury, he was working intelligence on iran. when he asked for unmasking on michael flynn, you have to ask yourself what was he looking for, what was he trying to find? when you think of samantha power, when you think of the leak to "the washington post" and the fact they had told david ignatius about this, they were looking at a logan act violation and went sideways from that and revealed the highly classified conversation which was very legitimate, which he was allowed to have, michael flynn with former ambassador russian sergey kislyak, you have to ask how long the obama officials have been doing this. that t needs to be the biggest part of the concern for john durham. that's exactly what he's going to be looking at. how extensive were these unmaskings? we only know this by sheer accident and by sheer coincidence that we were able to find this out. had a president trump not won the election, we would never be the wiser and this is how that administration and those people within the administration would have operated. i'm sure there's a lot more people on mast othe

neufeld, with the u.s. treasury, he was working intelligence on iran. so when he asked for unmasking on michael flynn, you have to ask what he was looking for, what was he trying to find? when you think of the leak to "the washington post" and the fact that they told david ignatius -- they were looking at a logan act violation and then went sideways for that and revealed the highly classified conversation, which was very legitimate, michael flynn, sir sergey kislyak, you have to ask yourself how long did the obama officials do this and that needs to be the biggest part of the concern for john durham and that's exactly what he's going to be looking at. how extensive were these unmaskings? we only know this sheer accident and by sheer coincidence that we were able to find this out. had president trump not won the election, we would never be the wiser and this is how. that administration and those people at the administer showinf operated. >> sean: this is just the tip of the iceberg. gregg jarrett, two best-selling books on this, let's talk about the legality in play here and the judge. >> judge