joining me now to discuss this, bringing back indira and michael oreskes.ere and what do you make of this? >> first of all, it's our job to publish. and we would err on the side of getting more information out, notless. howev however, there are many delicate situations where you use care in what you publish. crime scene photos are -- >> how did crime scene photos get published that were not spizspiz supposed to be out there? >> i can't say they should or shouldn't have been published. i don't know if anything in the crime scene photos did compromise the effort to capture the rest of that cell, which is presumably is what the british government was engaged in. but every news organization has very strict rules how we judge these things and how we make these decisions. when i was at the a. pfp., for example, we held a story for more than a year, that had serious allegations against -- about incompetence and misjudgments at the cia because we were afraid that the story might compromise the lives of certain people involved in the story. so, news organizations ar